Difference between revisions of "Idaho Teachers' Collective Bargaining Veto Referendums, Props. 1 and 2 (2) (2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Opposition)
m (Text replace - ""," to ","")
(20 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
  referred  = |
 
  referred  = |
 
  topic = [[:Category:Education|Education]]|
 
  topic = [[:Category:Education|Education]]|
  status = On the ballot|
+
  status = {{defeated}} |
}}{{tnr}}'''Propositions 1 and 2''' also know as the '''Idaho Teachers' Collecive Bargaining Veto Referendums''', will be on the [[Idaho 2012 ballot measures|November 6, 2012]] ballot in the state of [[Idaho]] as [[veto referendum]]s.  The measures were filed in response to education bills that were signed into law during 2011 state legislative session.  
+
}}{{tnr}}'''Propositions 1 and 2''' also known as the '''Idaho Teachers' Collecive Bargaining Veto Referendums''', was on the [[Idaho 2012 ballot measures|November 6, 2012]] ballot in the state of [[Idaho]] as [[veto referendum]]s, where they were '''defeated'''.  The measures were filed in response to education bills that were signed into law during the 2011 state legislative session.  
  
One measure would repeal a newly passed law that relates to teachers' collective bargaining agreements.  According to reports, the law ends tenure and removes issues like workload and class size from contract negotiations.   
+
One measure would repeal a law that related to teachers' collective bargaining agreements.  According to reports, the law ended tenure and removed issues like workload and class size from contract negotiations.   
  
 
The second referendum was filed to repeal a similar law also dealing with collective bargaining.  
 
The second referendum was filed to repeal a similar law also dealing with collective bargaining.  
  
The proposed veto referendums were filed with the Idaho election's office on [[BC2011#March|March 18, 2011]]. A [[Idaho Online Learning Veto Referendum|third veto referendum, Proposition 3, was filed]] after a previously pending third education-related law was signed into effect. The referendums were filed with the [[Idaho Secretary of State]]'s office around [[BC2011#April|April 8, 2011]].<ref> [http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/19/us-idaho-unions-idUSTRE72I02X20110319 ''Reuters'', "Idaho teacher union may ask voters to overturn curbs", March 18, 2011]</ref><ref name=cir> [http://www.nwcn.com/home/?fId=118423129&fPath=/news/local&fDomain=10222 ''NWCN.com'', "Idaho teachers union takes first step to repeal education bills", March 22, 2011]</ref><ref name=filed> [http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/hbo/2011/apr/08/referendum-drive-greets-ed-reform/ ''The Spokesman-Review'', "Referendum Drive Greets Ed ‘Reform’", April 8, 2011]</ref>
+
The proposed veto referendums were filed with the Idaho election's office on [[BC2011#March|March 18, 2011]]. A [[Idaho Online Learning Veto Referendum|third veto referendum, Proposition 3, was filed]] after a previously pending third education-related law was signed into effect. The referendums were filed with the [[Idaho Secretary of State]]'s office around [[BC2011#April|April 8, 2011]].<ref> [http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/19/us-idaho-unions-idUSTRE72I02X20110319 ''Reuters'', "Idaho teacher union may ask voters to overturn curbs," March 18, 2011]</ref><ref name=cir> [http://www.nwcn.com/home/?fId=118423129&fPath=/news/local&fDomain=10222 ''NWCN.com'', "Idaho teachers union takes first step to repeal education bills," March 22, 2011]</ref><ref name=filed> [http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/hbo/2011/apr/08/referendum-drive-greets-ed-reform/ ''The Spokesman-Review'', "Referendum Drive Greets Ed ‘Reform’," April 8, 2011]</ref>
 +
==Election results==
 +
:: ''See also: [[2012 ballot measure election results]]''
 +
The following are '''official''' election results:
 +
 
 +
{{Short outcome
 +
| title = Idaho Proposition 1
 +
| yes = 277,102
 +
| yespct = 42.7
 +
| no = 371,224
 +
| nopct = 57.1
 +
| image = {{Defeated}}
 +
| unresolved =
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
Results via [http://www.sos.idaho.gov/elect/RESULTS/2012/General/tot_stwd.htm Idaho Secretary of State].
 +
 
 +
{{Short outcome
 +
| title = Idaho Proposition 2
 +
| yes = 272,939
 +
| yespct = 42
 +
| no = 376,689
 +
| nopct = 58
 +
| image = {{defeated}}
 +
| unresolved =
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
Results via [http://www.sos.idaho.gov/elect/RESULTS/2012/General/tot_stwd.htm Idaho Secretary of State].
 +
 
 +
==Text of the measure==
 +
The following was the ballot text voters saw for Proposition 1:<ref> [http://www.sos.idaho.gov/elect/INITS/2012refer.htm ''Idaho Secretary of State'', "2012 GENERAL ELECTION REFERENDA BALLOT QUESTIONS," Retrieved October 17, 2012]</ref>
 +
 
 +
{{quote|''Referendum to approve or reject legislation limiting negotiated agreements between teachers and local school boards and ending the practice of issuing renewable contracts.''
 +
 
 +
''Referendum to approve or reject S1108; relating to education: revising Idaho Code by amending 33-513, 33-514, 33-514A, 33-515, 33-515A, 33-516, 33-521, 33-522, 33-1003, 33-1004H, 33-1271, 33-1272, 33-1273, 33-1274, 33-1275, 33-1276 and 33-402; repealing 33-1004G; and, by adding new sections 33-515B, 33-523, 33-524, 33-1271A, 33-1273A and 33-1274A to revise the annual written evaluation process for professional staff; phase out renewable individual contracts; provide that professional staff employed after January 31, 2011 shall not be entitled to a formal review of decisions for not being reemployed; allow school boards to change the length of terms stated in current contracts and reduce the salaries of certificated staff with renewable contracts without due process proceedings; require school districts to disclose to employees a list of professional liability insurance providers; eliminate education support program for school districts experiencing enrollment decreases greater than one percent; eliminate teacher early retirement incentives; restrict the scope of negotiated agreements between school boards and professional staff to compensation and the duration of negotiated agreements to one year; and eliminate provisions for fact finding in professional negotiations.''
 +
 
 +
''Shall the legislation limiting negotiated agreements between teachers and local school boards and ending the practice of issuing renewable contracts be approved?''
 +
 
 +
''A YES vote means you approve the legislation.''
 +
''A NO vote means you reject the legislation.''}}
 +
 
 +
The following is the ballot text voters saw for Proposition 1:<ref> [http://www.sos.idaho.gov/elect/INITS/2012refer.htm ''Idaho Secretary of State'', "2012 GENERAL ELECTION REFERENDA BALLOT QUESTIONS," Retrieved October 17, 2012]</ref>
 +
 
 +
{{quote|''Referendum to approve or reject legislation providing teacher performance pay based on state-mandated test scores, student performance, hard-to-fill positions and leadership.''
 +
 
 +
''Referendum to approve or reject S1110; relating to education: revising Idaho Code by adding new section 33-1004I to provide and distribute in fiscal year 2013 state share-based pay for performance bonuses to certificated instructional staff based on a school's median student growth percentiles on state achievement tests and a school's median standardized score on state achievement tests and local share-based pay for performance based on student test scores, graduation rates, dropout rates, percent of graduates attending postsecondary education or entering military service, meeting federal "adequate yearly progress," number of students successfully completing dual credit or advanced placement classes; percent of students in extracurricular activities, class projects, portfolios, successful completion of special student assignments, parental involvement, teacher-assigned grades, and/or student attendance rates, and, in fiscal year 2014 and thereafter, in addition to the aforementioned bonuses, provide incentives for certificated instructional staff in hard-to-fill positions and leadership awards for certificated instructional staff who assume one or more of the following additional duties: instructional staff mentoring, content leadership, lead teacher, peer coaching, content specialist, remedial instructor, curriculum development, assessment development, data analysis, grant writing, special program coordinator, research project, professional development instructor, service on education committees, educational leadership and earning national board certification.''
 +
 
 +
''Shall the legislation providing teacher performance pay based on state-mandated test scores, student performance, hard-to-fill positions and leadership be approved?''
 +
 
 +
''A YES vote means you approve the legislation.''
 +
''A NO vote means you reject the legislation.''}}
 
==Targeted laws==
 
==Targeted laws==
The following laws are being targeted by the three referendum:
+
The following laws were targeted by the three referendum:
  
:'''''Editor's note:''' Each law is followed by the formal ballot title in which each of the referendums will appear on the ballot.''
+
:'''''Editor's note:''' Each law is followed by the formal ballot title in which each of the referendums appeared on the ballot.''
  
 
* [http://www.legislature.idaho.gov/legislation/2011/S1108.htm Senate Bill 1108] (Proposition 1) governs collective bargaining rights dealing with teachers in the state.
 
* [http://www.legislature.idaho.gov/legislation/2011/S1108.htm Senate Bill 1108] (Proposition 1) governs collective bargaining rights dealing with teachers in the state.
Line 27: Line 77:
 
==Support==
 
==Support==
 
===Supporters===
 
===Supporters===
* The [http://www.idahoea.org/ Idaho Education Association (IEA)] are the sponsors of the veto referendum filed.<ref name=sides> [http://www.klewtv.com/news/local/118475079.html ''KLEWTV.com'', "IEA pushes education bill referendum", March 22, 2011]</ref>
+
* Idaho Republicans elected Barry Peterson to lead the campaign for the legislative bills. According to reports, GOP leaders described Peterson as an example of the state's conservative origins. Peterson was a Mountain Home, Idaho hardware store owner.  According to Peterson, “We will unitedly work to have a more effective and impactful role in the politics of our state. I see the most important role in our central committee in the state as that of the executive director. I will immediately seek assistance from you, if you have a recommendation, to get the very best on the board.”<ref> [http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2012/jun/24/idaho-gop-elects-leader/ ''Idaho Spokesman'', "Idaho GOP elects leader who will fight repeal of education reforms," June 24, 2012]</ref>
* Idahoans for Responsible Education Reform filed the third referendum.<ref name=filed/>
+
* The main campaign for the pieces of legislation wsa [http://www.yes4idaho.com/ Yes! for Idaho Education].
 +
* [[Governor of Idaho]] [[Butch Otter]] stated that he would personally campaign for the pieces of legislation. According to Otter, when commenting on the referendum efforts: “That’s the people’s right — that’s what being part of a republic is all about. We’re going to do our level best to make sure that the correct information gets out.” Otter later added: "I hope they fail."
 +
* Former [[Governor of Florida]] Jeb Bush endorsed the reform, saying that the pieces of legislation "will be the models for the rest of the country.”<ref> [http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2011/jun/14/jeb-bush-idaho-ed-reforms-models-country/ ''The Spokesman-Review'', "Jeb Bush: Idaho ed reforms ‘models’ for country," June 14, 2011]</ref>
 +
* Tom Luna, state superintendent, defended Senate Bill 1108, stating: "We had a system where it was almost impossible to financially reward great teachers and very difficult to deal with ineffective teachers. If you want an education system that truly puts students first, you have to have both."<ref> [http://magicvalley.com/news/state-and-regional/idaho-on-forefront-of-weakening-tenure-rights-for-teachers/article_454b341a-46c5-11e1-a948-0019bb2963f4.html ''Magic Valley'', "Idaho on Forefront of Weakening Tenure Rights for Teachers," January 24, 2012]</ref>
 +
===Campaigning, events and strategies===
 +
* At the Idaho Association of Commerce and Industry’s annual conference in Twin Falls, the [[Idaho Governor|Gov. Otter]] praised the group for supporting the three Idaho education reform bills, and urged even more support by stating: “The results were the three bills that we finally got through with your help, with your assistance, with your faith, and now they’re under attack. So I need that same energy that you helped us with in the Legislature this last session.”<ref> [http://www.idahopress.com/news/otter-to-business-support-ed-laws/article_8cb05d9e-98ab-11e0-9829-001cc4c03286.html ''Idaho Press'', "Otter to business: Support ed laws," June 17, 2011]</ref>
  
 +
* On [[BC2012#January|January 31, 2012]] State schools Superintendent Tom Luna defended the laws that [[Idaho 2012 ballot measures|the referendums]] are targeting in front of a joint meeting of the House and Senate education committees. He told lawmakers: “As year, as you know, we passed the most comprehensive education reform in the country. We had to find a way to spend the money we currently had differently.”<ref> [http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/boise/2012/jan/31/luna-lawmakers-we-passed-most-comprehensive-ed-reform-country/ ''The Spokesman-Review'', "Luna to lawmakers: ‘We had to have a new education system’," January 31, 2012]</ref>
 +
 +
==Opposition==
 +
===Opponents===
 +
* The [http://www.idahoea.org/ Idaho Education Association (IEA)] were the sponsors of the veto referendum filed.<ref name=sides> [http://www.klewtv.com/news/local/118475079.html ''KLEWTV.com'', "IEA pushes education bill referendum," March 22, 2011]</ref>
 +
* Idahoans for Responsible Education Reform filed the third referendum.<ref name=filed/>
 +
* The Boise School Board voted to oppose the legislation that was placed on the ballot by veto referendum.<ref> [http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/09/25/2288361/boise-school-board-opposes-students.html ''Idaho Statesman'', "Boise school board opposes Students Come First laws on Nov. 6 ballot," September 25, 2012]</ref>
 
===Arguments===
 
===Arguments===
* IEA President Sherri Wood stated about the laws the referendum are trying to repeal: "Basically this so-called reform is nothing more than sending the responsibility to the districts to say we get to cut a whole bunch of things in order to fund technology and a pay-for-performance plan."<ref name=sides/>
+
* IEA President Sherri Wood stated about the laws the referendum were trying to repeal: "Basically this so-called reform is nothing more than sending the responsibility to the districts to say we get to cut a whole bunch of things in order to fund technology and a pay-for-performance plan."<ref name=sides/>
 
===Donors===
 
===Donors===
The following is a donation that was made towards the campaign in favor of the measure.  The donation was made for signature gathering and petition printing costs, according to reports:<ref> [http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/902ba9b15e714f9889fe8965085f1818/ID--Education-Reform-Referendum/ ''The Republic'', "Natl Education Assn pays for signature gatherers for referendum on education reform", April 28, 2011]</ref>
+
The following is a donation that was made towards the campaign against the legislation.  The donation was made for signature gathering and petition printing costs, according to reports:<ref> [http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/902ba9b15e714f9889fe8965085f1818/ID--Education-Reform-Referendum/ ''The Republic'', "Natl Education Assn pays for signature gatherers for referendum on education reform," April 28, 2011]</ref>
  
 
{{donor box}}
 
{{donor box}}
Line 39: Line 101:
 
|National Education Association || $75,000
 
|National Education Association || $75,000
 
|}
 
|}
 
==Opposition==
 
===Opponents===
 
* The main campaign against the referendums, therefore in favor of upholding the laws, is [http://www.yes4idaho.com/ Yes! for Idaho Education].
 
* [[Governor of Idaho]] [[Butch Otter]] stated that he would personally campaign against them. According to Otter, when commenting on the referendum efforts: “That’s the people’s right — that’s what being part of a republic is all about. We’re going to do our level best to make sure that the correct information gets out.” Otter later added: "I hope they fail."
 
* Former [[Governor of Florida]] Jeb Bush endorsed the reform, saying that the pieces of legislation "will be the models for the rest of the country.”<ref> [http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2011/jun/14/jeb-bush-idaho-ed-reforms-models-country/ ''The Spokesman-Review'', "Jeb Bush: Idaho ed reforms ‘models’ for country", June 14, 2011]</ref>
 
* Tom Luna, state superintendent, defended Senate Bill 1108, stating: "We had a system where it was almost impossible to financially reward great teachers and very difficult to deal with ineffective teachers. If you want an education system that truly puts students first, you have to have both."<ref> [http://magicvalley.com/news/state-and-regional/idaho-on-forefront-of-weakening-tenure-rights-for-teachers/article_454b341a-46c5-11e1-a948-0019bb2963f4.html ''Magic Valley'', "Idaho on Forefront of Weakening Tenure Rights for Teachers", January 24, 2012]</ref>
 
 
===Campaigning, events and strategies===
 
* At the Idaho Association of Commerce and Industry’s annual conference in Twin Falls, the [[Idaho Governor|Gov. Otter]] praised the group for supporting the three Idaho education reform bills, and urged even more support by stating: “The results were the three bills that we finally got through with your help, with your assistance, with your faith, and now they’re under attack. So I need that same energy that you helped us with in the Legislature this last session.”<ref> [http://www.idahopress.com/news/otter-to-business-support-ed-laws/article_8cb05d9e-98ab-11e0-9829-001cc4c03286.html ''Idaho Press'', "Otter to business: Support ed laws", June 17, 2011]</ref>
 
 
* On [[BC2012#January|January 31, 2012]] State schools Superintendent Tom Luna defended the laws that [[Idaho 2012 ballot measures|the referendums]] are targeting in front of a joint meeting of the House and Senate education committees. He told lawmakers: “As year, as you know, we passed the most comprehensive education reform in the country. We had to find a way to spend the money we currently had differently.”<ref> [http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/boise/2012/jan/31/luna-lawmakers-we-passed-most-comprehensive-ed-reform-country/ ''The Spokesman-Review'', "Luna to lawmakers: ‘We had to have a new education system’", January 31, 2012]</ref>
 
  
 
==Other perspectives==
 
==Other perspectives==
* [[Idaho Secretary of State]] [[Ben Ysursa]] had an alternative perspective on the referendums, without giving his position on the purpose behind them.  He stated: "Obviously we have the state Legislature, but we also have the people who have reserved for themselves, legislative power to reject legislation, that's the referendum. That's the people's right to legislate, and that's on equal footing, with the Legislature's right to legislate, and here you go back and forth." Ysursa also stated that he would spend the next year and half before the election educating voters on what a "yes" and "no" vote means for the referendums.<ref> [http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNH5VbikpVa52MUc18tl-w9SLDCfDQ&url=http://www.nwcn.com/home/?fId%3D122693879%26fPath%3D/news/local%26fDomain%3D10227 ''NWCN.com'', "Secretary of state weighs in on education reform referendum", May 26, 2011]</ref>
+
* [[Idaho Secretary of State]] [[Ben Ysursa]] had an alternative perspective on the referendums, without giving his position on the purpose behind them.  He stated: "Obviously we have the state Legislature, but we also have the people who have reserved for themselves, legislative power to reject legislation, that's the referendum. That's the people's right to legislate, and that's on equal footing, with the Legislature's right to legislate, and here you go back and forth." Ysursa also stated that he would spend the next year and half before the election educating voters on what a "yes" and "no" vote means for the referendums.<ref> [http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNH5VbikpVa52MUc18tl-w9SLDCfDQ&url=http://www.nwcn.com/home/?fId%3D122693879%26fPath%3D/news/local%26fDomain%3D10227 ''NWCN.com'', "Secretary of state weighs in on education reform referendum," May 26, 2011]</ref>
  
 
==Lawsuits==
 
==Lawsuits==
On [[BC2011#April|April 27, 2011]], the The Idaho Education Association filed a lawsuit in 4th District Court in Ada County against SB 1108,  challenging the constitutionality of the bill.  According to IEA President Sherri Wood, when commenting on the lawsuit and the ongoing referendum effort, “Because the Legislature, Gov. Otter and State Superintendent (Tom) Luna failed to listen to the voices of Idaho citizens and, in the case of SB 1108 and the trailer bills, overstepped their legal bounds, the IEA supports citizen efforts to place referendums on the ballot challenging the Luna laws. Likewise, we will challenge the constitutionality of SB 1108 and the trailer bills.”<ref> [http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2011/apr/27/idaho-teachers-sue-block-reform-bill/ ''Idaho Spokesman'', "Idaho teachers sue to block reform bill", April 27, 2011]</ref>
+
On [[BC2011#April|April 27, 2011]], the The Idaho Education Association filed a lawsuit in 4th District Court in Ada County against SB 1108,  challenging the constitutionality of the bill.  According to IEA President Sherri Wood, when commenting on the lawsuit and the ongoing referendum effort, “Because the Legislature, Gov. Otter and State Superintendent (Tom) Luna failed to listen to the voices of Idaho citizens and, in the case of SB 1108 and the trailer bills, overstepped their legal bounds, the IEA supports citizen efforts to place referendums on the ballot challenging the Luna laws. Likewise, we will challenge the constitutionality of SB 1108 and the trailer bills.”<ref> [http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2011/apr/27/idaho-teachers-sue-block-reform-bill/ ''Idaho Spokesman'', "Idaho teachers sue to block reform bill," April 27, 2011]</ref>
  
On [[BC2011#September|September 30, 2011]], an Fourth District Judge Timothy Hansen upheld Senate Bill 1108. Hansen stated in his 18-page ruling that collective bargaining limitation "is both reasonable and necessary to the legitimate purposes furthered by SB 1108. As noted above, one of those purposes is returning decision-making power to local school boards."<ref name=decision> [http://www.idahopress.com/news/state/idaho-court-upholds-big-part-of-luna-s-ed-reforms/article_0f412b9c-30ae-5109-8a6c-905011490cf0.html ''Idaho Press.com'', "Idaho court upholds big part of Luna's ed reforms", September 30, 2011]</ref>
+
On [[BC2011#September|September 30, 2011]], a Fourth District Judge Timothy Hansen upheld Senate Bill 1108. Hansen stated in his 18-page ruling that collective bargaining limitation "is both reasonable and necessary to the legitimate purposes furthered by SB 1108. As noted above, one of those purposes is returning decision-making power to local school boards."<ref name=decision> [http://www.idahopress.com/news/state/idaho-court-upholds-big-part-of-luna-s-ed-reforms/article_0f412b9c-30ae-5109-8a6c-905011490cf0.html ''Idaho Press.com'', "Idaho court upholds big part of Luna's ed reforms," September 30, 2011]</ref>
  
 
According to Gov. Otter, when commenting on the decision and [[Idaho 2012 ballot measures|the three veto referendums on the 2012 ballot]]: "That's welcome news. But we recognize this issue and the fate of Students Come First will remain in the courts — including the court of public opinion. Superintendent Luna and I are confident that Idaho citizens understand what's at stake."<ref name=decision/>
 
According to Gov. Otter, when commenting on the decision and [[Idaho 2012 ballot measures|the three veto referendums on the 2012 ballot]]: "That's welcome news. But we recognize this issue and the fate of Students Come First will remain in the courts — including the court of public opinion. Superintendent Luna and I are confident that Idaho citizens understand what's at stake."<ref name=decision/>
Line 64: Line 114:
 
==Path to the ballot==
 
==Path to the ballot==
 
===Signature requirements===
 
===Signature requirements===
In order for a proposed veto referendum to be placed on the 2012 statewide ballot for Idaho voters to decide, at least 47,432 signatures '''for each''' targeted bill must have been collected within 60 days after lawmakers leave for the session. On [[BC2011#April|April 7, 2011]], the [[Idaho Legislature]] concluded their [[Dates of 2011 state legislative sessions|2011 state legislative session]], meaning any referendum effort hoping to obtain ballot access had until [[BC2011#June|June 1, 2011]] to submit the required amount of signatures to county clerks' offices.  Once the clerks verified enough signatures, the verified signatures were then returned to the supporters.  Supporters then had until [[BC2011#June|June 6, 2011]] to submit them to the [[Idaho Secretary of State]].<ref name=cir/><ref> [http://www.klewtv.com/news/local/120260069.html ''Klewtv.com'', "Effort underway to repeal education reforms", April 24, 2011]</ref><ref name=sigs> [http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNG6zK-mZBjrdYxUXKCHCWVux-5d4Q&url=http://www.idahoreporter.com/2011/education-reform-referendums-probably-have-signatures-to-get-on-the-ballot/ ''Idaho Reporter'', "Education reform referendums probably have signatures to get on the ballot", May 25, 2011]</ref>
+
In order for a proposed veto referendum to be placed on the 2012 statewide ballot for Idaho voters to decide, at least 47,432 signatures '''for each''' targeted bill must have been collected within 60 days after lawmakers leave for the session. On [[BC2011#April|April 7, 2011]], the [[Idaho Legislature]] concluded their [[Dates of 2011 state legislative sessions|2011 state legislative session]], meaning any referendum effort hoping to obtain ballot access had until [[BC2011#June|June 1, 2011]] to submit the required amount of signatures to county clerks' offices.  Once the clerks verified enough signatures, the verified signatures were then returned to the supporters.  Supporters then had until [[BC2011#June|June 6, 2011]] to submit them to the [[Idaho Secretary of State]].<ref name=cir/><ref> [http://www.klewtv.com/news/local/120260069.html ''Klewtv.com'', "Effort underway to repeal education reforms," April 24, 2011]</ref><ref name=sigs> [http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNG6zK-mZBjrdYxUXKCHCWVux-5d4Q&url=http://www.idahoreporter.com/2011/education-reform-referendums-probably-have-signatures-to-get-on-the-ballot/ ''Idaho Reporter'', "Education reform referendums probably have signatures to get on the ballot," May 25, 2011]</ref>
  
On [[BC2011#May|May 20, 2011]], it was reported that the referendum effort was close to its goals of collecting signatures. Supporters of the effort fully expected to turn in signatures by the June 1 deadline. According to Tim Hurst, the chief deputy secretary of state, when commenting the exact amount of signatures already collected by the initiative effort: “We’re not going to know until the clerks have got everything entered if they’ve got enough [signatures]. We also know there are a lot of signatures that have not been checked by the clerks yet.”<ref> [http://www.publicnewsservice.org/index.php?/content/article/20184-1 ''Public News Service'', "Education Referenda Signature Gatherers: “Almost There”", May 20, 2011]</ref><ref> [http://www.idahoreporter.com/2011/education-referendum-most-of-the-way-to-its-goal/ ''Idaho Reporter'', "Education referendum most of the way to its goal", May 19, 2011]</ref>
+
On [[BC2011#May|May 20, 2011]], it was reported that the referendum effort was close to its goals of collecting signatures. Supporters of the effort fully expected to turn in signatures by the June 1 deadline. According to Tim Hurst, the chief deputy secretary of state, when commenting the exact amount of signatures already collected by the initiative effort: “We’re not going to know until the clerks have got everything entered if they’ve got enough [signatures]. We also know there are a lot of signatures that have not been checked by the clerks yet.”<ref> [http://www.publicnewsservice.org/index.php?/content/article/20184-1 ''Public News Service'', "Education Referenda Signature Gatherers: “Almost There”," May 20, 2011]</ref><ref> [http://www.idahoreporter.com/2011/education-referendum-most-of-the-way-to-its-goal/ ''Idaho Reporter'', "Education referendum most of the way to its goal," May 19, 2011]</ref>
  
 
Then on [[BC2011#May|May 25, 2011]], it was reported that supporters had collected enough signatures to place one of the three measures on the ballot, and were within 800 signatures for the last two proposed ballot referendums.<ref name=sigs/>
 
Then on [[BC2011#May|May 25, 2011]], it was reported that supporters had collected enough signatures to place one of the three measures on the ballot, and were within 800 signatures for the last two proposed ballot referendums.<ref name=sigs/>
Line 74: Line 124:
 
When contacted by Ballotpedia, the Idaho Secretary of State's office stated that although signatures had not been filed as of 3:30 p.m. MDT, contact was made with the petition organizers, and that signatures would be filed before the close of business.  
 
When contacted by Ballotpedia, the Idaho Secretary of State's office stated that although signatures had not been filed as of 3:30 p.m. MDT, contact was made with the petition organizers, and that signatures would be filed before the close of business.  
  
Signatures were submitted to the Secretary of State's office, reports confirm, as more than 210,000 verified signatures were submitted.  Each referendum needed 47,432 valid signatures, which means the more than 72,000 signatures submitted for each measure was well above the requirements.  Official ballot placement from the Secretary of State's office was expected shortly after submission of signatures.<ref> [http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2011/jun/07/in-brief-signed-referendum-petitions-submitted/ ''Idaho Spokesman'', "In brief: Signed referendum petitions submitted", June 7, 2011]</ref>
+
Signatures were submitted to the Secretary of State's office, reports confirm, as more than 210,000 verified signatures were submitted.  Each referendum needed 47,432 valid signatures, which means the more than 72,000 signatures submitted for each measure was well above the requirements.  Official ballot placement from the Secretary of State's office was expected shortly after submission of signatures.<ref> [http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2011/jun/07/in-brief-signed-referendum-petitions-submitted/ ''Idaho Spokesman'', "In brief: Signed referendum petitions submitted," June 7, 2011]</ref>
  
 
Then, on [[BC2012#June|June 13, 2012]], the [[Idaho Secretary of State]]'s office issued official certificates placing the referendums on the [[2012 ballot measures|November 6, 2012 general election ballot]].
 
Then, on [[BC2012#June|June 13, 2012]], the [[Idaho Secretary of State]]'s office issued official certificates placing the referendums on the [[2012 ballot measures|November 6, 2012 general election ballot]].
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
{{AOrtiz}}
+
{{submit a link}}
 
*[[2012 ballot measures]]
 
*[[2012 ballot measures]]
 
*[[Idaho 2012 ballot measures]]
 
*[[Idaho 2012 ballot measures]]

Revision as of 07:51, 19 March 2014

Prop. 1 and 2
Flag of Idaho.png
Click here for the latest news on U.S. ballot measures
Quick stats
Type:Veto Referendum
State code:(Targeted laws)SB 1108, 1110, 1184
Topic:Education
Status:Defeatedd
Propositions 1 and 2 also known as the Idaho Teachers' Collecive Bargaining Veto Referendums, was on the November 6, 2012 ballot in the state of Idaho as veto referendums, where they were defeated. The measures were filed in response to education bills that were signed into law during the 2011 state legislative session.

One measure would repeal a law that related to teachers' collective bargaining agreements. According to reports, the law ended tenure and removed issues like workload and class size from contract negotiations.

The second referendum was filed to repeal a similar law also dealing with collective bargaining.

The proposed veto referendums were filed with the Idaho election's office on March 18, 2011. A third veto referendum, Proposition 3, was filed after a previously pending third education-related law was signed into effect. The referendums were filed with the Idaho Secretary of State's office around April 8, 2011.[1][2][3]

Election results

See also: 2012 ballot measure election results

The following are official election results:

Idaho Proposition 1
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No371,22457.1%
Yes 277,102 42.7%

Results via Idaho Secretary of State.

Idaho Proposition 2
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No376,68958%
Yes 272,939 42%

Results via Idaho Secretary of State.

Text of the measure

The following was the ballot text voters saw for Proposition 1:[4]

Referendum to approve or reject legislation limiting negotiated agreements between teachers and local school boards and ending the practice of issuing renewable contracts.

Referendum to approve or reject S1108; relating to education: revising Idaho Code by amending 33-513, 33-514, 33-514A, 33-515, 33-515A, 33-516, 33-521, 33-522, 33-1003, 33-1004H, 33-1271, 33-1272, 33-1273, 33-1274, 33-1275, 33-1276 and 33-402; repealing 33-1004G; and, by adding new sections 33-515B, 33-523, 33-524, 33-1271A, 33-1273A and 33-1274A to revise the annual written evaluation process for professional staff; phase out renewable individual contracts; provide that professional staff employed after January 31, 2011 shall not be entitled to a formal review of decisions for not being reemployed; allow school boards to change the length of terms stated in current contracts and reduce the salaries of certificated staff with renewable contracts without due process proceedings; require school districts to disclose to employees a list of professional liability insurance providers; eliminate education support program for school districts experiencing enrollment decreases greater than one percent; eliminate teacher early retirement incentives; restrict the scope of negotiated agreements between school boards and professional staff to compensation and the duration of negotiated agreements to one year; and eliminate provisions for fact finding in professional negotiations.

Shall the legislation limiting negotiated agreements between teachers and local school boards and ending the practice of issuing renewable contracts be approved?

A YES vote means you approve the legislation. A NO vote means you reject the legislation.[5]

The following is the ballot text voters saw for Proposition 1:[6]

Referendum to approve or reject legislation providing teacher performance pay based on state-mandated test scores, student performance, hard-to-fill positions and leadership.

Referendum to approve or reject S1110; relating to education: revising Idaho Code by adding new section 33-1004I to provide and distribute in fiscal year 2013 state share-based pay for performance bonuses to certificated instructional staff based on a school's median student growth percentiles on state achievement tests and a school's median standardized score on state achievement tests and local share-based pay for performance based on student test scores, graduation rates, dropout rates, percent of graduates attending postsecondary education or entering military service, meeting federal "adequate yearly progress," number of students successfully completing dual credit or advanced placement classes; percent of students in extracurricular activities, class projects, portfolios, successful completion of special student assignments, parental involvement, teacher-assigned grades, and/or student attendance rates, and, in fiscal year 2014 and thereafter, in addition to the aforementioned bonuses, provide incentives for certificated instructional staff in hard-to-fill positions and leadership awards for certificated instructional staff who assume one or more of the following additional duties: instructional staff mentoring, content leadership, lead teacher, peer coaching, content specialist, remedial instructor, curriculum development, assessment development, data analysis, grant writing, special program coordinator, research project, professional development instructor, service on education committees, educational leadership and earning national board certification.

Shall the legislation providing teacher performance pay based on state-mandated test scores, student performance, hard-to-fill positions and leadership be approved?

A YES vote means you approve the legislation. A NO vote means you reject the legislation.[5]

Targeted laws

The following laws were targeted by the three referendum:

Editor's note: Each law is followed by the formal ballot title in which each of the referendums appeared on the ballot.
  • Senate Bill 1108 (Proposition 1) governs collective bargaining rights dealing with teachers in the state.
Statement of Purpose
Statement of Purpose

Support

Supporters

  • Idaho Republicans elected Barry Peterson to lead the campaign for the legislative bills. According to reports, GOP leaders described Peterson as an example of the state's conservative origins. Peterson was a Mountain Home, Idaho hardware store owner. According to Peterson, “We will unitedly work to have a more effective and impactful role in the politics of our state. I see the most important role in our central committee in the state as that of the executive director. I will immediately seek assistance from you, if you have a recommendation, to get the very best on the board.”[7]
  • The main campaign for the pieces of legislation wsa Yes! for Idaho Education.
  • Governor of Idaho Butch Otter stated that he would personally campaign for the pieces of legislation. According to Otter, when commenting on the referendum efforts: “That’s the people’s right — that’s what being part of a republic is all about. We’re going to do our level best to make sure that the correct information gets out.” Otter later added: "I hope they fail."
  • Former Governor of Florida Jeb Bush endorsed the reform, saying that the pieces of legislation "will be the models for the rest of the country.”[8]
  • Tom Luna, state superintendent, defended Senate Bill 1108, stating: "We had a system where it was almost impossible to financially reward great teachers and very difficult to deal with ineffective teachers. If you want an education system that truly puts students first, you have to have both."[9]

Campaigning, events and strategies

  • At the Idaho Association of Commerce and Industry’s annual conference in Twin Falls, the Gov. Otter praised the group for supporting the three Idaho education reform bills, and urged even more support by stating: “The results were the three bills that we finally got through with your help, with your assistance, with your faith, and now they’re under attack. So I need that same energy that you helped us with in the Legislature this last session.”[10]
  • On January 31, 2012 State schools Superintendent Tom Luna defended the laws that the referendums are targeting in front of a joint meeting of the House and Senate education committees. He told lawmakers: “As year, as you know, we passed the most comprehensive education reform in the country. We had to find a way to spend the money we currently had differently.”[11]

Opposition

Opponents

  • The Idaho Education Association (IEA) were the sponsors of the veto referendum filed.[12]
  • Idahoans for Responsible Education Reform filed the third referendum.[3]
  • The Boise School Board voted to oppose the legislation that was placed on the ballot by veto referendum.[13]

Arguments

  • IEA President Sherri Wood stated about the laws the referendum were trying to repeal: "Basically this so-called reform is nothing more than sending the responsibility to the districts to say we get to cut a whole bunch of things in order to fund technology and a pay-for-performance plan."[12]

Donors

The following is a donation that was made towards the campaign against the legislation. The donation was made for signature gathering and petition printing costs, according to reports:[14]

Donor Amount
National Education Association $75,000

Other perspectives

  • Idaho Secretary of State Ben Ysursa had an alternative perspective on the referendums, without giving his position on the purpose behind them. He stated: "Obviously we have the state Legislature, but we also have the people who have reserved for themselves, legislative power to reject legislation, that's the referendum. That's the people's right to legislate, and that's on equal footing, with the Legislature's right to legislate, and here you go back and forth." Ysursa also stated that he would spend the next year and half before the election educating voters on what a "yes" and "no" vote means for the referendums.[15]

Lawsuits

On April 27, 2011, the The Idaho Education Association filed a lawsuit in 4th District Court in Ada County against SB 1108, challenging the constitutionality of the bill. According to IEA President Sherri Wood, when commenting on the lawsuit and the ongoing referendum effort, “Because the Legislature, Gov. Otter and State Superintendent (Tom) Luna failed to listen to the voices of Idaho citizens and, in the case of SB 1108 and the trailer bills, overstepped their legal bounds, the IEA supports citizen efforts to place referendums on the ballot challenging the Luna laws. Likewise, we will challenge the constitutionality of SB 1108 and the trailer bills.”[16]

On September 30, 2011, a Fourth District Judge Timothy Hansen upheld Senate Bill 1108. Hansen stated in his 18-page ruling that collective bargaining limitation "is both reasonable and necessary to the legitimate purposes furthered by SB 1108. As noted above, one of those purposes is returning decision-making power to local school boards."[17]

According to Gov. Otter, when commenting on the decision and the three veto referendums on the 2012 ballot: "That's welcome news. But we recognize this issue and the fate of Students Come First will remain in the courts — including the court of public opinion. Superintendent Luna and I are confident that Idaho citizens understand what's at stake."[17]

Path to the ballot

Signature requirements

In order for a proposed veto referendum to be placed on the 2012 statewide ballot for Idaho voters to decide, at least 47,432 signatures for each targeted bill must have been collected within 60 days after lawmakers leave for the session. On April 7, 2011, the Idaho Legislature concluded their 2011 state legislative session, meaning any referendum effort hoping to obtain ballot access had until June 1, 2011 to submit the required amount of signatures to county clerks' offices. Once the clerks verified enough signatures, the verified signatures were then returned to the supporters. Supporters then had until June 6, 2011 to submit them to the Idaho Secretary of State.[2][18][19]

On May 20, 2011, it was reported that the referendum effort was close to its goals of collecting signatures. Supporters of the effort fully expected to turn in signatures by the June 1 deadline. According to Tim Hurst, the chief deputy secretary of state, when commenting the exact amount of signatures already collected by the initiative effort: “We’re not going to know until the clerks have got everything entered if they’ve got enough [signatures]. We also know there are a lot of signatures that have not been checked by the clerks yet.”[20][21]

Then on May 25, 2011, it was reported that supporters had collected enough signatures to place one of the three measures on the ballot, and were within 800 signatures for the last two proposed ballot referendums.[19]

Signature submission

As the June 1 deadline arrived, in the middle of that day, it was reported that each of the three referendums had enough valid signatures to make the ballot, although those numbers were unofficial. According to reports, the number of validated signatures by county clerks across the state were as follows: 65,088 for SB 1108, 65,252 for SB 1110, and 63,744 for SB 1184.

When contacted by Ballotpedia, the Idaho Secretary of State's office stated that although signatures had not been filed as of 3:30 p.m. MDT, contact was made with the petition organizers, and that signatures would be filed before the close of business.

Signatures were submitted to the Secretary of State's office, reports confirm, as more than 210,000 verified signatures were submitted. Each referendum needed 47,432 valid signatures, which means the more than 72,000 signatures submitted for each measure was well above the requirements. Official ballot placement from the Secretary of State's office was expected shortly after submission of signatures.[22]

Then, on June 13, 2012, the Idaho Secretary of State's office issued official certificates placing the referendums on the November 6, 2012 general election ballot.

See also

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

Additional reading

References

  1. Reuters, "Idaho teacher union may ask voters to overturn curbs," March 18, 2011
  2. 2.0 2.1 NWCN.com, "Idaho teachers union takes first step to repeal education bills," March 22, 2011
  3. 3.0 3.1 The Spokesman-Review, "Referendum Drive Greets Ed ‘Reform’," April 8, 2011
  4. Idaho Secretary of State, "2012 GENERAL ELECTION REFERENDA BALLOT QUESTIONS," Retrieved October 17, 2012
  5. 5.0 5.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
  6. Idaho Secretary of State, "2012 GENERAL ELECTION REFERENDA BALLOT QUESTIONS," Retrieved October 17, 2012
  7. Idaho Spokesman, "Idaho GOP elects leader who will fight repeal of education reforms," June 24, 2012
  8. The Spokesman-Review, "Jeb Bush: Idaho ed reforms ‘models’ for country," June 14, 2011
  9. Magic Valley, "Idaho on Forefront of Weakening Tenure Rights for Teachers," January 24, 2012
  10. Idaho Press, "Otter to business: Support ed laws," June 17, 2011
  11. The Spokesman-Review, "Luna to lawmakers: ‘We had to have a new education system’," January 31, 2012
  12. 12.0 12.1 KLEWTV.com, "IEA pushes education bill referendum," March 22, 2011
  13. Idaho Statesman, "Boise school board opposes Students Come First laws on Nov. 6 ballot," September 25, 2012
  14. The Republic, "Natl Education Assn pays for signature gatherers for referendum on education reform," April 28, 2011
  15. NWCN.com, "Secretary of state weighs in on education reform referendum," May 26, 2011
  16. Idaho Spokesman, "Idaho teachers sue to block reform bill," April 27, 2011
  17. 17.0 17.1 Idaho Press.com, "Idaho court upholds big part of Luna's ed reforms," September 30, 2011
  18. Klewtv.com, "Effort underway to repeal education reforms," April 24, 2011
  19. 19.0 19.1 Idaho Reporter, "Education reform referendums probably have signatures to get on the ballot," May 25, 2011
  20. Public News Service, "Education Referenda Signature Gatherers: “Almost There”," May 20, 2011
  21. Idaho Reporter, "Education referendum most of the way to its goal," May 19, 2011
  22. Idaho Spokesman, "In brief: Signed referendum petitions submitted," June 7, 2011