Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Idaho Teachers' Collective Bargaining Veto Referendums, Props. 1 and 2 (2) (2012)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 15:13, 30 June 2011 by BaileyL (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Prop. 1 and 2
Current veto referendum.png
Quick stats
Type:Veto Referendum
Constitution:n/a
State code:(Targeted laws)SB 1108, 1110, 1184
Referred by:n/a
Topic:Education
Status:On the ballot
Propositions 1 and 2 also know as the Idaho Teachers' Collecive Bargaining Veto Referendums, will be on the November 6, 2012 ballot in the state of Idaho as veto referendums. The measures were filed in response to education bills that were signed into law during 2011 state legislative session.

One measure would repeal a newly passed law that relates to teachers' collective bargaining agreements. According to reports, the law ends tenure and removes issues like workload and class size from contract negotiations.

The second referendum was filed to repeal a similar law also dealing with collective bargaining.

The proposed veto referendums were filed with the Idaho election's office on March 18, 2011. A third veto referendum was filed after a previously pending third education-related law was signed into effect. The referendums were filed with the Idaho Secretary of State's office around April 8, 2011.[1][2][3]

Targeted laws

The following laws are being targeted by the three referendum:

Editor's note: Each law is followed by the formal ballot title in which each of the referendums will appear on the ballot.
  • Senate Bill 1108 (Proposition 1) governs collective bargaining rights dealing with teachers in the state.
Statement of Purpose
Statement of Purpose
Statement of Purpose

Support

Supporters

  • The Idaho Education Association (IEA) are the sponsors of the veto referendum filed.[4]
  • Idahoans for Responsible Education Reform filed the third referendum.[3]

Arguments

  • IEA President Sherri Wood stated about the laws the referendum are trying to repeal: "Basically this so-called reform is nothing more than sending the responsibility to the districts to say we get to cut a whole bunch of things in order to fund technology and a pay-for-performance plan."[4]

Donors

The following is a donation that was made towards the campaign in favor of the measure. The donation was made for signature gathering and petition printing costs, according to reports:[5]

Donor Amount
National Education Association $75,000

Opposition

Opponents

  • Governor of Idaho Butch Otter stated that he would personally campaign against them. According to Otter, when commenting on the referendum efforts: “That’s the people’s right — that’s what being part of a republic is all about. We’re going to do our level best to make sure that the correct information gets out.” Otter later added: "I hope they fail."
  • Former Governor of Florida Jeb Bush endorsed the reform, saying that the pieces of legislation "will be the models for the rest of the country.”[6]

Campaigning, events and strategies

  • At the Idaho Association of Commerce and Industry’s annual conference in Twin Falls, the Gov. Otter praised the group for supporting the three Idaho education reform bills, and urged even more support by stating: “The results were the three bills that we finally got through with your help, with your assistance, with your faith, and now they’re under attack. So I need that same energy that you helped us with in the Legislature this last session.”[7]

Other perspectives

  • Idaho Secretary of State Ben Ysursa had an alternative perspective on the referendums, without giving his position on the purpose behind them. He stated: "Obviously we have the state Legislature, but we also have the people who have reserved for themselves, legislative power to reject legislation, that's the referendum. That's the people's right to legislate, and that's on equal footing, with the Legislature's right to legislate, and here you go back and forth." Ysursa also stated that he would spend the next year and half before the election educating voters on what a "yes" and "no" vote means for the referendums.[8]

Lawsuits

  • On April 27, 2011, the The Idaho Education Association filed a lawsuit in 4th District Court in Ada County against SB 1108, challenging the constitutionality of the bill. According to IEA President Sherri Wood, when commenting on the lawsuit and the ongoing referendum effort, “Because the Legislature, Gov. Otter and State Superintendent (Tom) Luna failed to listen to the voices of Idaho citizens and, in the case of SB 1108 and the trailer bills, overstepped their legal bounds, the IEA supports citizen efforts to place referendums on the ballot challenging the Luna laws. Likewise, we will challenge the constitutionality of SB 1108 and the trailer bills.”[9]

Path to the ballot

In order for a proposed veto referendum to be placed on the 2012 statewide ballot for Idaho voters to decide, at least 47,432 signatures for each targeted bill must have been collected within 60 days after lawmakers leave for the session. On April 7, 2011, the Idaho Legislature concluded their 2011 state legislative session, meaning any referendum effort hoping to obtain ballot access had until June 1, 2011 to submit the required amount of signatures to county clerks' offices. Once the clerks verified enough signatures, the verified signatures were then returned to the supporters. Supporters then had until June 6, 2011 to submit them to the Idaho Secretary of State.[2][10][11]

On May 20, 2011, it was reported that the referendum effort was close to its goals of collecting signatures. Supporters of the effort fully expected to turn in signatures by the June 1 deadline. According to Tim Hurst, the chief deputy secretary of state, when commenting the exact amount of signatures already collected by the initiative effort: “We’re not going to know until the clerks have got everything entered if they’ve got enough [signatures]. We also know there are a lot of signatures that have not been checked by the clerks yet.”[12][13]

Then on May 25, 2011, it was reported that supporters had collected enough signatures to place one of the three measures on the ballot, and were within 800 signatures for the last two proposed ballot referendums.[11]

As the June 1 deadline arrived, in the middle of that day, it was reported that each of the three referendums had enough valid signatures to make the ballot, although those numbers were unofficial. According to reports, the number of validated signatures by county clerks across the state were as follows: 65,088 for SB 1108, 65,252 for SB 1110, and 63,744 for SB 1184.

When contacted by Ballotpedia, the Idaho Secretary of State's office stated that although signatures had not been filed as of 3:30 p.m. MDT, contact was made with the petition organizers, and that signatures would be filed before the close of business.

Signatures were submitted to the Secretary of State's office, reports confirm, as more than 210,000 verified signatures were submitted. Each referendum needed 47,432 valid signatures, which means the more than 72,000 signatures submitted for each measure was well above the requirements. Official ballot placement from the Secretary of State's office was expected shortly after submission of signatures.[14]

Then, on June 13, 2012, the Idaho Secretary of State's office issued official certificates placing the referendums on the November 6, 2012 general election ballot.

See also

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

Additional reading

References