Difference between revisions of "Independence Institute v. Colorado Secretary of State"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - 'Lamm Consulting' to 'LAMM Political Partners, LLC')
Line 21: Line 21:
* Douglas Campbell
* Douglas Campbell
* Louis Schroeder
* Louis Schroeder
* Scott Lamm (of [[Lamm Consulting]])
* Scott Lamm (of [[LAMM Political Partners, LLC]])
* Albie Hurst (of [[Lamm Consulting]])
* Albie Hurst (of [[LAMM Political Partners, LLC]])
* Daniel Kennedy
* Daniel Kennedy

Revision as of 16:56, 13 December 2011

Independence Institute v. Colorado Secretary of State is a federal lawsuit filed in 2010 in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The plaintiffs in the case seek to have a federal judge determine whether several key provisions of Colorado House Bill 1326 (2009) are unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution.

Federal district judge Philip Brimmer issued a 39-page preliminary injunction on June 11, 2010, forbidding the state of Colorado from enforcing several key provisions of Colorado House Bill 1326 (2009). Judge Brimmer's order, in particular, found that the provisions of HB 1326 that ban compensating petition circulators on a pay-per-signature basis

Killmer, Lane & Newman, LLP, a law firm in Denver, is handling the litigation on behalf of the plaintiffs.

A key finding in the June 11 preliminary injunction is:

"Based on Dr. Smith’s testimony and in consideration of the other evidence offered at the hearing, the Court finds that pay-per-signature compensation is no more likely than pay-per-hour compensation to induce fraudulent signature gathering or to increase invalidity rates."


Plaintiffs in the case are:

See also

External links


This law-related article is a stub. You can help people learn by expanding it.