Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "Jerome County Lease-Purchase Jail Agreement (November 2009)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Election results)
(Election results)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
==Election results==
 
==Election results==
The measure was '''defeated''' because it failed to meet the two-thirds requirement.<ref>[http://www.magicvalley.com/news/local/article_b6b77daa-ddf4-54e1-8ba9-735eeceb0bda.html ''Twin Falls Times-News'',"Jerome voters should expect replay of jail proposal in May," November 5, 2009]</ref>
+
The measure was '''failed to meet the two-thirds requirement and thus was defeated'''.<ref>[http://www.magicvalley.com/news/local/article_b6b77daa-ddf4-54e1-8ba9-735eeceb0bda.html ''Twin Falls Times-News'',"Jerome voters should expect replay of jail proposal in May," November 5, 2009]</ref>
  
 
{{Outcome
 
{{Outcome

Revision as of 16:16, 9 November 2009

The Jerome County Lease-Purchase Jail Agreement question appeared on the November 3 ballot in Jerome County.

The question asked county voters if the county should incur debt in order to enter into a lease-purchase agreement for a new county jail. The lease would be paid through available funds from the county. The lease would not last more than 30 years.[1]

Election results

The measure was failed to meet the two-thirds requirement and thus was defeated.[2]

County Jail Agreement Question
Result Votes Percentage
Approveda Yes 1,191 65.55%
No 626 34.45%
Total votes 1,817 100.00%
Voter turnout 22.6%


References