Note: Ballotpedia will be read-only from 9pm CST on February 25-March 5 while Judgepedia is merged into Ballotpedia.
For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.

John Adler

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 10:32, 27 March 2014 by Justin Haas (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

John Adler
Placeholder image.png
Do you have a photo that could go here? Submit it for this profile by emailing us!
U.S. House, New Jersey, District 3
Former member
In office
January 3, 2009 – January 3, 2011
PartyDemocratic
Elections and appointments
Last electionNovember 2010
Term limitsN/A
Personal
Date of birthApril 4, 2011
Place of birthPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania
ProfessionAttorney
ReligionJudaism
John Adler was a Democratic member of the U.S. House representing the 3rd District of New Jersey.

Voting Record

Frequency of Voting with Democratic Leadership

According to a July 2010 analysis of 1,357 votes cast from January 1, 2009 to June 16, 2010, Adler has voted with the House Democratic leadership 90.7% of the time.[1] That same analysis reported that he also voted with party leadership 90% of the time in 2010.

Washington Post Analysis

A separate analysis from The Washington Post from July 23, 2010, concluded that he votes 91.1% of the time with a majority of Democrats in the House of Representatives.[2]

Specific votes

Rep. Adler voted for the stimulus bill.[3] 57% of U.S. voters believe that the stimulus has either hurt the economy (36%) or had no impact (21%). 38% believe the stimulus helped the economy.[4]

Adler also voted in favor of the "Cash for Clunkers" bill.[5] According to a June 2009 Rasmussen Reports poll, 54% of likely U.S. voters opposed Cash for Clunkers, while 35% supported it.[6]

Adler supported the "Cap and Trade" bill.[7] Just after the bill’s passage, 42% of likely U.S. voters said that cap and trade would hurt the economy, while 19% believed it would help. 15% said that the bill would have no impact.[8]

References