PGI logo cropped.png
Congressional Millionaire’s Club
The Personal Gain Index shines a light on how members of Congress benefit during their tenure.





Difference between revisions of "Kern County Sludge Initiative Measure E (2006)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - '[[category' to '[[Category')
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Kern County Measure E''' appeared on the June 6, 2006 ballot in [[Kern County, California ballot measures|Kern County]].  It was approved with a landslide of 85,011 votes in favor to 17,117 votes against, or 83.24% to 16.76%.  It is sometimes called "the anti-sludge ordinance", since it bans the importation into Kern County of sludge (sewage) from other counties.
+
{{TOCnestright}}'''Kern County Measure E''' appeared on the [[June 6, 2006 ballot measures in California|June 6, 2006 ballot]] in [[Kern County, California ballot measures|Kern County]].  It was approved with a landslide of 85,011 votes in favor to 17,117 votes against, or 83.24% to 16.76%.  It is sometimes called "the anti-sludge ordinance", since it bans the importation into Kern County of sludge (sewage) from other counties.
  
 
The ballot question read, "Shall the ordinance prohibiting the land application of biosolids in the unincorporated area of Kern County be adopted?"
 
The ballot question read, "Shall the ordinance prohibiting the land application of biosolids in the unincorporated area of Kern County be adopted?"
  
 
==Kern County residents tire of sludge from other counties==
 
==Kern County residents tire of sludge from other counties==
 
 
The background to the passage of the initiative is that Kern County residents came to resent the fact that for ten years, southern California water treatment agencies had been trucking treated human sewage to Kern County and dumping it on Kern County farm fields.  This included the City of Los Angeles, which since 1999 had been sending about 26 tractor trailer loads a day of its biosolids to a 4,700 acre piece of land owned by the city in Kern County.  The land, a 15-acre parcel 15 miles southwest of Bakersfield, is known as "Green Acres".
 
The background to the passage of the initiative is that Kern County residents came to resent the fact that for ten years, southern California water treatment agencies had been trucking treated human sewage to Kern County and dumping it on Kern County farm fields.  This included the City of Los Angeles, which since 1999 had been sending about 26 tractor trailer loads a day of its biosolids to a 4,700 acre piece of land owned by the city in Kern County.  The land, a 15-acre parcel 15 miles southwest of Bakersfield, is known as "Green Acres".
  
 
==Lawsuit to keep the initiative off the ballot fails==
 
==Lawsuit to keep the initiative off the ballot fails==
 
 
Two Spanish-speaking truckers who made their living shipping sludge into Kern County sued to keep the measure off the June 6 ballot.  The contention of drivers Jose S. Bonilla and Rafael C. Rivera was that their civil rights were violated because the signature-gathering petition was printed only in English.  They relied on the legal reasoning in [[Padilla v. Lever]]. <ref>Bakersfield Californian, [http://www.bakersfield.com/102/story/44823.html? ''Lawsuit to keep on truckin' in Fresno today''], April 6, 2006</ref>,<ref>Bakersfield Californian, [http://www.bakersfield.com/102/story/44620.html ''Sludge initiative on hold''], April 5, 2006</ref>
 
Two Spanish-speaking truckers who made their living shipping sludge into Kern County sued to keep the measure off the June 6 ballot.  The contention of drivers Jose S. Bonilla and Rafael C. Rivera was that their civil rights were violated because the signature-gathering petition was printed only in English.  They relied on the legal reasoning in [[Padilla v. Lever]]. <ref>Bakersfield Californian, [http://www.bakersfield.com/102/story/44823.html? ''Lawsuit to keep on truckin' in Fresno today''], April 6, 2006</ref>,<ref>Bakersfield Californian, [http://www.bakersfield.com/102/story/44620.html ''Sludge initiative on hold''], April 5, 2006</ref>
  
 
==Los Angeles, others successfully sue Kern County after Measure E passes==
 
==Los Angeles, others successfully sue Kern County after Measure E passes==
 
 
After Measure E passed, Kern County was sued in federal court by the City of Los Angeles, and other southern California cities who used Kern County for sludge dumping purposes.  In the case of [[City of Los Angeles v. Kern County]], Judge Gary Allen Feess of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that Measure E was unconstitutional. Judge Feess asserted this on the grounds that Measure E violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.  
 
After Measure E passed, Kern County was sued in federal court by the City of Los Angeles, and other southern California cities who used Kern County for sludge dumping purposes.  In the case of [[City of Los Angeles v. Kern County]], Judge Gary Allen Feess of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that Measure E was unconstitutional. Judge Feess asserted this on the grounds that Measure E violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.  
  
Line 18: Line 15:
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
 
* [http://list.web.net/archives/sludgewatch-l/2006-April/001243.html Kern County - sludge truckers try to block popular sludge initiative]
 
* [http://list.web.net/archives/sludgewatch-l/2006-April/001243.html Kern County - sludge truckers try to block popular sludge initiative]
 
* [http://www.martenlaw.com/news/?20071003-biosolids-ban-overturned Here comes the sludge]
 
* [http://www.martenlaw.com/news/?20071003-biosolids-ban-overturned Here comes the sludge]
 +
* [[Kern County, California ballot measures]]
 +
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kern_County,_California Kern County on Wikipedia]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
<references/>
+
{{reflist}}
 
{{california}}
 
{{california}}
 +
 +
[[Category:Environment, California]]
 +
[[Category:California 2006 local ballot measures]]

Revision as of 17:26, 3 July 2011

Kern County Measure E appeared on the June 6, 2006 ballot in Kern County. It was approved with a landslide of 85,011 votes in favor to 17,117 votes against, or 83.24% to 16.76%. It is sometimes called "the anti-sludge ordinance", since it bans the importation into Kern County of sludge (sewage) from other counties.

The ballot question read, "Shall the ordinance prohibiting the land application of biosolids in the unincorporated area of Kern County be adopted?"

Kern County residents tire of sludge from other counties

The background to the passage of the initiative is that Kern County residents came to resent the fact that for ten years, southern California water treatment agencies had been trucking treated human sewage to Kern County and dumping it on Kern County farm fields. This included the City of Los Angeles, which since 1999 had been sending about 26 tractor trailer loads a day of its biosolids to a 4,700 acre piece of land owned by the city in Kern County. The land, a 15-acre parcel 15 miles southwest of Bakersfield, is known as "Green Acres".

Lawsuit to keep the initiative off the ballot fails

Two Spanish-speaking truckers who made their living shipping sludge into Kern County sued to keep the measure off the June 6 ballot. The contention of drivers Jose S. Bonilla and Rafael C. Rivera was that their civil rights were violated because the signature-gathering petition was printed only in English. They relied on the legal reasoning in Padilla v. Lever. [1],[2]

Los Angeles, others successfully sue Kern County after Measure E passes

After Measure E passed, Kern County was sued in federal court by the City of Los Angeles, and other southern California cities who used Kern County for sludge dumping purposes. In the case of City of Los Angeles v. Kern County, Judge Gary Allen Feess of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that Measure E was unconstitutional. Judge Feess asserted this on the grounds that Measure E violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Kern County has spent upwards of $200,000 defending Measure E in court. In April 2008, county attorneys asked the Kern County Board of Supervisors to set aside another $362,000 to defend the ordinance.[3]

External links

References

  1. Bakersfield Californian, Lawsuit to keep on truckin' in Fresno today, April 6, 2006
  2. Bakersfield Californian, Sludge initiative on hold, April 5, 2006
  3. KGET-TV, Costs soar in legal battle over measure E, April 11, 2008