Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "Knighton Road Development in Churn Creek Bottom Referendum, Measure A (June 2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Election results)
m (Text replace - "ategory:Zoning, land use and development" to "ategory:Local zoning, land use and development")
Line 45: Line 45:
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
  
[[Category:Zoning, land use and development, California, 2012]]
+
[[Category:Local zoning, land use and development, California, 2012]]

Revision as of 10:22, 13 October 2012

Proposed location of the contested development
A Referendum on the Proposed Knighton Road Development in Churn Creek Bottom, Measure A was on the June 5, 2012 ballot in Shasta County, where it was overwhelmingly defeated.[1]

The referendum gave the voters of the county an opportunity to weigh in on a development proposal for Knighton Road that was approved by the Shasta County Board of Supervisors in August 2011.[2] The development, if voters approve of it going forward, will be handled by the development firm of Hawkins Cos.[1]

A "yes" vote on Measure A would have allowed the proposed development to move ahead. A "no" vote means that the development will not be allowed to go ahead.[3]

Although opponents of the Knighton Road Development were successful with Measure A in stopping the proposed development, their Measure B attempt to "freeze" all development in Churn Creek until 2036 was decisively defeated.

Election results

Measure A
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No29,24866.11%
Yes 14,991 33.89%
These final election results are from the Shasta County elections office.

Proposed development

The proposed shopping center development would have gone on what is currently a 92-acre empty lot.[2]

It would have been built by the Hawkins Cos., LLC, a development company based in Boise, Idaho. Jeff Hess, the development company's chief operating officer, indicated that they would spend $130 million on the development and that the development would generate $52 million annually in wages because of the roughly 1,600 permanent jobs it would create.[2] If the development goes ahead, the county is expected to receive about $1.36 million each year from it, in addition to $715,000 for the county's public safety fund.[2]

Hess said, "Where you have a significant amount of unemployment, people are going to be happy to have a job." The unemployment rate in Shasta County stands at close to 14%.[2]

Path to the ballot

The referendum was on the ballot because county residents who opposed the proposed development collected over 11,000 signatures on petitions to force a vote on the development.[1]

The same residents also qualified an initiative, the Shasta County Freeze on Zoning in Churn Creek Bottom, for the June 5, 2012 ballot.

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

References