SLP Badge Transparent.png
Read the
State Legislative Tracker
New edition available now!




Difference between revisions of "Maine same-sex marriage lawsuit filed to protect donor names"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - " <ref " to "<ref ")
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==='''[[BC2010#May|May 14, 2010]]'''===
 
==='''[[BC2010#May|May 14, 2010]]'''===
[[File:Invest.png|right|100px]]
+
[[File:Campaign Finance Ballotpedia.png|right|100px]]
'''Augusta, [[Maine]]:''' The [[National Organization for Marriage]] (NOM) has filed a federal lawsuit against the state after the [http://www.maine.gov/ethics/ Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices] launched a [[Maine_Same-Sex_Marriage_People's_Veto,_Question_1_(2009)#Fundraising_investigation|fundraising investigation]] in October 2009. The ethics commission is currently investigating whether the organization should have filed as a ballot question committee. However, the commission has requested donor names to verify donations. NOM attorney Josiah Neeley said the organization would be willing to list donations without names or addresses. However, Neeley argues that even without the disclosure of names, donors may worry about being part of an investigation or deposition in the future. The state, according to reports, believes most of the donations were completed verbally and they require donor names to verify the transactions. The state contends that names will be kept confidential.<ref name="KJMay14"/>
+
'''Augusta, [[Maine]]:''' The [[National Organization for Marriage]] (NOM) has filed a federal lawsuit against the state after the [http://www.maine.gov/ethics/ Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices] launched a [[Maine_Same-Sex_Marriage_People's_Veto,_Question_1_(2009)#Fundraising_investigation|fundraising investigation]] in October 2009. The investigation revolves around 2009's ballot measure - [[Maine Same-Sex Marriage People's Veto, Question 1 (2009)|Maine Same-Sex Marriage People's Veto, Question 1]]. Specifically, the ethics commission is currently investigating whether the organization should have filed as a ballot question committee.  
  
In May 2010 [[Judgepedia:Donald_Marden|Justice Donald Marden]] in [[Judgepedia:Maine_Superior_Court#Kennebec|Kennebec County Superior Court]] said he is concerned about the privacy of those who participate in the political system. "The court is really queasy in light of recent history of what it does to a person's 1st Amendment right when they contribute to a campaign. What are we doing with privacy these days?" <ref name="KJMay14">[http://www.kjonline.com/news/judge-appears-coolto-disclosing-names_2010-05-13.html ''Kennebec Journal'',"Judge appears cool to disclosing names," May 14, 2010]</ref>
+
However, the commission has requested donor names to verify donations. NOM attorney Josiah Neeley said the organization would be willing to list donations without names or addresses. However, Neeley argues that even without the disclosure of names, donors may worry about being part of an investigation or deposition in the future. The state, according to reports, believes most of the donations were completed verbally and they require donor names to verify the transactions. The state contends that names will be kept confidential.<ref name="KJMay14"/>
 +
 
 +
In May 2010 [[Judgepedia:Donald_Marden|Justice Donald Marden]] in [[Judgepedia:Maine_Superior_Court#Kennebec|Kennebec County Superior Court]] said he is concerned about the privacy of those who participate in the political system. "The court is really queasy in light of recent history of what it does to a person's 1st Amendment right when they contribute to a campaign. What are we doing with privacy these days?"<ref name="KJMay14">[http://www.kjonline.com/news/judge-appears-coolto-disclosing-names_2010-05-13.html ''Kennebec Journal'',"Judge appears cool to disclosing names," May 14, 2010]</ref>
  
 
The fundraising investigation and the privacy of donor names remain pending.  
 
The fundraising investigation and the privacy of donor names remain pending.  
Line 15: Line 17:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
<references/>
+
{{reflist}}
  
 
{{state news}}
 
{{state news}}
Line 21: Line 23:
 
[[Category:Maine 2010 news]]
 
[[Category:Maine 2010 news]]
 
[[Category:Election law news]]
 
[[Category:Election law news]]
 +
[[Category:2010 ballot news]]
 
[[Category:May 2010]]
 
[[Category:May 2010]]
 +
[[Category:Ballot lawsuit news]]
 +
[[Category:Same-sex marriage news]]
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__

Latest revision as of 09:23, 25 February 2014

May 14, 2010

Campaign Finance Ballotpedia.png

Augusta, Maine: The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) has filed a federal lawsuit against the state after the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices launched a fundraising investigation in October 2009. The investigation revolves around 2009's ballot measure - Maine Same-Sex Marriage People's Veto, Question 1. Specifically, the ethics commission is currently investigating whether the organization should have filed as a ballot question committee.

However, the commission has requested donor names to verify donations. NOM attorney Josiah Neeley said the organization would be willing to list donations without names or addresses. However, Neeley argues that even without the disclosure of names, donors may worry about being part of an investigation or deposition in the future. The state, according to reports, believes most of the donations were completed verbally and they require donor names to verify the transactions. The state contends that names will be kept confidential.[1]

In May 2010 Justice Donald Marden in Kennebec County Superior Court said he is concerned about the privacy of those who participate in the political system. "The court is really queasy in light of recent history of what it does to a person's 1st Amendment right when they contribute to a campaign. What are we doing with privacy these days?"[1]

The fundraising investigation and the privacy of donor names remain pending.

See also

Ballotpedia News

References