Difference between revisions of "Marriage and family on the ballot"
m (Text replace - 'Marriage on the ballot' to 'Marriage and family on the ballot')
m (Text replace - 'Ballot measures and the definition of marriage' to 'Marriage and family on the ballot')
|Line 51:||Line 51:|
In 2006, voters in nine states had the opportunity to weigh in on [[ballot measure]]s about how to [[
In 2006, voters in nine states had the opportunity to weigh in on [[ballot measure]]s about how to [[and the |define marriage]]. Each of the nine measures in one way or another was an attempt to legislatively define marriage as between a man and a woman. The [[Arizona Proposition 107 (2006)|Arizona initiative]] lost, representing the first time that a marriage-related amendment has been defeated (although a narrower ban was approved in 2008).
Revision as of 17:37, 16 September 2011
|Measures by topic|
|Measures by year|
|Measures by state|
Marriage and family on the ballot refers to ballot measures regarding marriage, unmarried couples, adoption, alimony, and benefits.
Subtopics of business regulation categorized on Ballotpedia include: Subtopics include:
One man and one woman?
Many marriage-related ballot measures offer definitions of marriage as a union of one man and one woman. In defining marriage in that fashion, proponents are saying that when a man and a man, or a woman and a woman, enter into a committed relationship with each other, their arrangements with each other should not legally be considered a marriage. These ballot measures are sometimes collectively referred to as Defense of Marriage Amendments or "DOMAs".
Altogether, voters in 29 states have passed state constitutional amendments that ban same-sex marriage: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin.
Hawaii voters approved a constitutional amendment empowering the legislature to outlaw same-sex marriage; that state's lawmakers then did so in 1998.
In 2009 voters in Washington approved granting all the rights of marriage to registered domestic partners.
Not all marriage-related amendments and initiatives are about defining marriage; some of them relate to adoption, custody, divorce and other marriage-related issues.
In 2008, California Proposition 8 was approved, representing the first time that same-sex marriage was banned in a state where it was already legal. Other notable developments included the approval of the Arizona Marriage Protection Amendment, which banned same-sex marriage in Arizona after a broader proposed amendment failed in 2006.
Failed, abandoned, withdrawn
California Elimination of Domestic Partnerships Initiative
California Voter's Right to Protect Marriage Initiative v.6
Florida Abolition of Alimony Obligations
Oregon Ballot Measure 303
Oregon Ballot Measure 304
In 2006, voters in nine states had the opportunity to weigh in on ballot measures about how to define marriage. Each of the nine measures in one way or another was an attempt to legislatively define marriage as between a man and a woman. The Arizona initiative lost, representing the first time that a marriage-related amendment has been defeated (although a narrower ban was approved in 2008).
- Alabama Sanctity of Marriage Amendment
- Colorado Amendment 43
- Idaho Amendment 2
- South Carolina Marriage Amendment
- South Dakota Amendment C
- Tennessee Marriage Amendment
- Virginia Marriage Amendment
- Wisconsin Question One
- Colorado Referendum I
- $18 million cumulatively was spent by political committees working for and against the nine proposals.
- Opponents of the measures outspent advocates by about 3-1.
- Only in Tennessee did supporters raise more money than opponents
- The Arlington Group contributed $1.65 million through "member groups and affiliates".
- Gay and lesbian rights groups contributed $5.64 million, mostly through the Gill Action Fund.
- Tim Gill and his connections cumulatively contributed $5.28 million to defeat the measures.
- Churches and their employees gave $234,344 to support the measures, versus $1.9 million in 2004.
|Measure||Outcome||% "yes" votes|
|Louisiana Marriage Amendment 1||78.0|
|Missouri Constitutional Amendment 2||70.7|
|Measure||Outcome||% "yes" votes|
|Arkansas Constitutional Amendment 3||74.9|
|Georgia Constitutional Amendment 1||76.2|
|Kentucky Marriage Amendment||74.6|
|Michigan Proposal 2||58.6|
|Mississippi Marriage Amendment 1||86.0|
|North Dakota Marriage Amendment||73.2|
|Ohio Marriage Amendment||61.7|
|Oklahoma State Question 711||75.6|
|Oregon Ballot Measure 36||56.6|
|Utah Marriage Amendment||65.9|
- Same-sex marriage: Breaking the firewall in California?, an October 14, 2008 report by the Initiative & Referendum Institute.
- State policies on gay marriage
- Marriage in the 50 states
- $101.1 Million Raised Around Same-Sex Partnership Ballot Measures In 2008
- The Money Behind the 2006 Marriage Amendments from the National Institute on Money in State Politics, July 23, 2007 (PDF)