Difference between revisions of "Marriage and family on the ballot"
|Line 9:||Line 9:|
[[Maine Same-Sex Marriage People's Veto, Question 1 (2009)]]
[[Washington Referendum 71 (2009)]]
Revision as of 10:30, 2 December 2009
Marriage and Family
|Not on ballot|
Altogether, voters in 29 states have passed state constitutional amendments that ban gay marriage: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin.
Hawaii voters approved a constitutional amendment empowering the legislature to outlaw same-sex marriage; that state's lawmakers then did so in 1998.
However, not all marriage-related amendments and initiatives are about defining marriage; some of them relate to adoption, custody, divorce and other marriage-related issues.
Failed, abandoned, withdrawn, or headed for a future ballot
- California Elimination of Domestic Partnerships Initiative
- California Voter's Right to Protect Marriage Initiative v.6
- Florida Abolition of Alimony Obligations
- Indiana SJR-7
- Oregon Ballot Measure 303.
- Oregon Ballot Measure 304.
In 2006, voters in nine states had the opportunity to weigh in on ballot measures about how to define marriage. Each of the nine measures in one way or another was an attempt to legislatively define marriage as between a man and a woman. The Arizona initiative lost, representing the first time that a marriage-related amendment has been defeated.
Alabama Sanctity of Marriage Amendment
Colorado Amendment 43
Colorado Referendum I
Idaho Amendment 2
South Carolina Marriage Amendment
South Dakota Amendment C
Tennessee Marriage Amendment
Virginia Marriage Amendment
Wisconsin Question One
- $18 million cumulatively was spent by political committees working for and against the nine proposals.
- Opponents of the measures outspent advocates by about 3-1.
- Only in Tennessee did supporters raise more money than opponents
- The Arlington Group contributed $1.65 million through "member groups and affiliates".
- Gay and lesbian rights groups contributed $5.64 million, mostly through the Gill Action Fund.
- Tim Gill and his connections cumulatively contributed $5.28 million to defeat the measures.
- Churches and their employees gave $234,344 to support the measures, versus $1.9 million in 2004.
|Measure||Outcome||% "yes" votes|
|Louisiana Marriage Amendment 1||78.0|
|Missouri Constitutional Amendment 2||70.7|
|Measure||Outcome||% "yes" votes|
|Arkansas Constitutional Amendment 3||74.9|
|Georgia Constitutional Amendment 1||76.2|
|Kentucky Marriage Amendment||74.6|
|Michigan Proposal 2||58.6|
|Mississippi Marriage Amendment 1||86|
|North Dakota Marriage Amendment (2004)||73.2|
|Ohio Marriage Amendment||61.7|
|Oklahoma State Question 711||75.6|
|Oregon Ballot Measure 36||56.6|
|Utah Marriage Amendment||65.9|
- Nevada Marriage Amendment, passed with 66.9%.
- Alabama Amendment 2, abolish prohibition on interracial marriages. Passed with 60%.
- California Proposition 22, defining marriage as one man/one woman. The measure passed with 61.2%. It was overturned by the California Supreme Court in May 2008.
- Nebraska Initiative 416, define marriage as one man/one woman. Passed with 70%.
- Nevada Marriage Amendment, define marriage as one man/one woman. Passed with 70%.
- Utah Proposition 2. Proposition 2 repealed an obsolete, 1896, provision of the Utah Constitution regarding property rights of married women. Passed with 70.5%.
- Alaska Marriage Amendment (1998), amending "the Declaration of Rights section of the Alaska Constitution to limit marriage. The amendment would say that to be valid, a marriage may exist only between one man and one woman." Passed with 68.1% of the vote.
- Same-sex marriage: Breaking the firewall in California?, an October 14, 2008 report by the Initiative & Referendum Institute.
- State policies on gay marriage
- Marriage in the 50 states
- $101.1 Million Raised Around Same-Sex Partnership Ballot Measures In 2008
- The Money Behind the 2006 Marriage Amendments from the National Institute on Money in State Politics, July 23, 2007 (PDF)
- New York Times, "Ballot initiative that would thwart gay marriage is embroiling California", February 25, 2000