Difference between revisions of "Merced Citizens' Right to Vote on Expansion of Residential Areas Initiative, Measure D (November 2010)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - "ategory:Zoning, land use and development" to "ategory:Local zoning, land use and development")
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}A '''Merced Citizens' Right to Vote on Expansion of Residential Areas Initiative, Measure D''' ballot proposition was on the {{nov02ca2010}} in {{merced}}.<ref>[http://www.mercedsunstar.com/2010/08/27/1545752/farming-groups-split-on-backing.html ''Merced Sun Star'', "Farming groups split on backing sprawl initiative on November ballot", August 27, 2010]</ref> It was '''approved.'''
+
{{tnr}}{{Property}}A '''Merced Citizens' Right to Vote on Expansion of Residential Areas Initiative, Measure D''' ballot proposition was on the {{nov02ca2010}} in {{merced}}.<ref>[http://www.mercedsunstar.com/2010/08/27/1545752/farming-groups-split-on-backing.html ''Merced Sun Star'', "Farming groups split on backing sprawl initiative on November ballot", August 27, 2010]</ref> It was '''approved.'''
  
==Election results==
+
This measure was a competing measure to [[Merced County Voter Confirmation of Zoning Changes, Measure C (November 2010)|Measure C]] and successfully sought to exempt 2,437 acres from the Measure C's provisions. Measure C failed, however, making Measure D somewhat irrelevant.
  
* Yes: 27,446 (63.61%) {{approved}}
+
For a run down of the dueling measures and the supporters and opponents of each see Ballotpedia's article on [[Merced County Voter Confirmation of Zoning Changes, Measure C (November 2010)|Measure C]].
* No: 15,704 (36.39%)
+
  
Election results from the [http://www.co.merced.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=1738 Merced County election website] as of November 12, 2010.
+
==Election results==
 +
{{Short outcome
 +
| title = Measure D
 +
| yes = 27,446 
 +
| yespct = 63.61
 +
| no = 15,704 
 +
| nopct = 36.39
 +
| image =
 +
| unresolved =
 +
| state = Local
 +
| percent = 50.0
 +
}}
 +
: These final, certified results are from the [http://www.co.merced.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=1738 Merced County elections office].
  
 
==Text of measure==
 
==Text of measure==
Line 20: Line 31:
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
+
{{submit a link}}
 
* [http://www.co.merced.ca.us/documents/Elections/2010/11_2_2010/clist/final_candidates_list_110210.PDF Text of Measure D] (scroll to p. 7)
 
* [http://www.co.merced.ca.us/documents/Elections/2010/11_2_2010/clist/final_candidates_list_110210.PDF Text of Measure D] (scroll to p. 7)
  
Line 26: Line 37:
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
  
 +
{{California}}
 
{{california counties}}
 
{{california counties}}
  
 
[[Category:Local zoning, land use and development, California, 2010]]
 
[[Category:Local zoning, land use and development, California, 2010]]

Revision as of 13:59, 12 September 2013

Voting on Property
Property.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
A Merced Citizens' Right to Vote on Expansion of Residential Areas Initiative, Measure D ballot proposition was on the November 2, 2010 ballot in Merced County.[1] It was approved.

This measure was a competing measure to Measure C and successfully sought to exempt 2,437 acres from the Measure C's provisions. Measure C failed, however, making Measure D somewhat irrelevant.

For a run down of the dueling measures and the supporters and opponents of each see Ballotpedia's article on Measure C.

Election results

Measure D
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 27,446 63.61%
No15,70436.39%
These final, certified results are from the Merced County elections office.

Text of measure

The question on the ballot:

Measure D: Shall the Ordinance correcting and clarifying the Citizens’ Right to Vote on Expansion of Residential Areas Initiative be adopted?[2]

See also

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

References

  1. Merced Sun Star, "Farming groups split on backing sprawl initiative on November ballot", August 27, 2010
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.