Difference between revisions of "Michigan International Bridge Initiative, Proposal 6 (2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(18 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{MIConstitution}}{{tnr}}
+
{{Ballot measure information |
 +
name        =  International Bridge Initiative |
 +
image  = [[File:Flag_of_Michigan.png|link=List of Michigan ballot measures|120px]] |
 +
type  = [[Constitutional amendment]] |
 +
constitution  = [[Michigan Constitution]] |
 +
statute  = |
 +
referred  = Citizens|
 +
topic = [[Transportation on the ballot]]|
 +
status = {{defeated}}|
 +
}}{{tnr}}
  
The '''Michigan International Bridge Initiative''' may be on the [[Michigan 2012 ballot measures|November 6, 2012]] statewide ballot in [[Michigan]] as an {{icafull}}.  If enacted this measure would require voters to approve any new bridge or tunnel from Michigan to Canada.  The measure was proposed by the Detroit International Bridge Co. and is being sponsored by a committee called The People Should Decide.<ref>[http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012204210360 ''Detroit Free Press'' "Ambassador owners plan to take bridge battle to November ballot," April 21, 2012]</ref><ref>[http://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/Bal_Prop_Status_2011_2_346859_7.pdf Michigan Secretary of State, statewide ballot proposal status, retrieved May 4, 2012]</ref>
+
The '''Michigan International Bridge Initiative''' was on the [[Michigan 2012 ballot measures|November 6, 2012]] statewide ballot in [[Michigan]] as an {{icafull}}, where it was '''defeated'''.  If enacted this measure would have required voters to approve any new bridge or tunnel from Michigan to Canada.  The measure was proposed by the Detroit International Bridge Co. and is being sponsored by a committee called The People Should Decide.<ref>[http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012204210360 ''Detroit Free Press'' "Ambassador owners plan to take bridge battle to November ballot," April 21, 2012]</ref><ref>[http://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/Bal_Prop_Status_2011_2_346859_7.pdf Michigan Secretary of State, statewide ballot proposal status, retrieved May 4, 2012]</ref>
 +
==Election results==
 +
:: ''See also: [[2012 ballot measure election results]]''
 +
 
 +
{{Short outcome
 +
| title = Michigan Proposal 6
 +
| yes =  1,853,127
 +
| yespct = 41
 +
| no =  2,699,558
 +
| nopct = 59
 +
| image = {{Defeated}}
 +
| unresolved =
 +
}}
 +
[[Category:Defeated, general, 2012]]
 +
 
 +
:''Official results from the [http://miboecfr.nictusa.com/election/results/12GEN/90000006.html Michigan Secretary of State].''
 +
 
 +
==Text of measure==
 +
The official ballot text read as follows:<ref>[http://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/The_People_Should_Decide_396198_7.pdf ''Michigan Secretary of State'',"Proposal 6," retrieved September 10, 2012]</ref>
 +
 
 +
<blockquote><b>PROPOSAL 12-1<br/>
 +
A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL BRIDGES AND TUNNELS</b><br/><br/>
 +
This proposal would:
 +
 
 +
* Require the approval of a majority of voters at a statewide election and in each municipality where “new international bridges or tunnels for motor vehicles” are to be located before the State of Michigan may expend state funds or resources for acquiring land, designing, soliciting bids for, constructing, financing, or promoting new international bridges or tunnels.<br/>
 +
 
 +
* Create a definition of "new international bridges or tunnels for motor vehicles" that means, "any bridge or tunnel which is not open to the public and serving traffic as of January 1, 2012."<br/><br/>
 +
 
 +
Should this proposal be approved?<br/>
 +
<b>YES __<br/>
 +
NO ____</b>
 +
</blockquote>
  
 
==Background==
 
==Background==
Line 7: Line 47:
  
 
==Support==
 
==Support==
The Detroit International Bridge Co. has released a number of ads either supporting the amendment or targeting the New International Trade Crossing.  However, the group Michigan Truth Squad, part of the bipartisan Center for Michigan, has rated all the ads "Flagrant Foul," questioning the truthfulness of their contents.<ref name="methods"/>
+
The Detroit International Bridge Co. released a number of ads either supporting the amendment or targeting the New International Trade Crossing.  However, the group Michigan Truth Squad, part of the bipartisan Center for Michigan, rated all the ads "Flagrant Foul," questioning the truthfulness of their contents.<ref name="methods"/>
 +
 
 +
===Arguments===
 +
* Founder of Washington, D.C.-based Americans for Tax Reform, Grover Norquist, voiced his support for the measure arguing that the government should not get "into the business of building bridges." Norquist says federal funds will be used to construct a U.S. customs plaza for the bridge, something he says, "is not free."<ref>[http://www.mlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/10/anti-tax_advocate_grover_norqu.html ''MLive.com'' "Anti-tax advocate Grover Norquist endorses bridge ballot measure," October 4, 2012]</ref>
  
 
===Campaign contributions===
 
===Campaign contributions===
Line 26: Line 69:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 
  
 
==Opposition==
 
==Opposition==
Line 34: Line 76:
 
* Gov. Rick Snyder
 
* Gov. Rick Snyder
 
* State Rep. [[Rashida Tlaib]]<ref name="methods"/>
 
* State Rep. [[Rashida Tlaib]]<ref name="methods"/>
 +
* Michigan Chamber of Commerce<ref>[http://www.freep.com/article/20120916/NEWS15/309160161/Poll-Michigan-voters-skeptical-about-collective-bargaining-bridge-ballot-proposals?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE ''Detroit Free Press'',"Poll: Michigan voters skeptical about collective bargaining, bridge ballot proposals," September 16, 2012]</ref>
 +
* Taxpayers Against Monopolies
 +
 +
===Arguments===
 +
* In a press release published in September 2012, Gov. Snyder said, "While the proposal is intended to protect one company's monopoly on truck crossings between Detroit and Canada, it was sloppily written and jeopardizes ANY bridge under construction today that won't be completed by January 1, 2012, or any bridge built thereafter."<ref>[http://michigan.gov/snyder/0,4668,7-277-60279-286346--,00.html Press release from Gov. Rick Snyder, September 2012]</ref>
 +
 +
==Polls==
 +
::''See also: [[Polls, 2012 ballot measures]]''
 +
* An ''EPIC-MRA'' poll conducted on September 8-11, 2012, found that 47 percent were in support of the measure, while 44 percent were opposed, and another 9% were undecided. The poll was based on a poll of 600 likely voters and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percent.<ref>[http://www.freep.com/article/20120916/NEWS15/309160161/Poll-Michigan-voters-skeptical-about-collective-bargaining-bridge-ballot-proposals?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE ''Detroit Free Press'',"Poll: Michigan voters skeptical about collective bargaining, bridge ballot proposals," September 16, 2012]</ref>
 +
<table style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; width: 242px; border: #99B3FF solid 1px">
 +
<tr><td>{{BallotMeasurePollLegend}}</td></tr>
 +
</table>
 +
{{MIInternationalBridgeInitiativePoll}}
  
 
==Path to the ballot==
 
==Path to the ballot==
 
:: ''See also: [[Michigan signature requirements]]''
 
:: ''See also: [[Michigan signature requirements]]''
  
In order to place the measure on the [[2012 ballot measures|November 2012 ballot]] supporters must collect a minimum of 322,609 valid signatures by [[BC2012#July|July 9, 2012]].
+
In order to place the measure on the [[2012 ballot measures|November 2012 ballot]] supporters were required to collect a minimum of 322,609 valid signatures by [[BC2012#July|July 9, 2012]].
 +
 
 +
Following a stalemate vote in the Board of State Canvassers, the measure was taken to the [[Judgepedia:Michigan Supreme Court|Michigan Supreme Court]] where it was certified for the ballot.<ref>[http://www.freep.com/article/20120906/NEWS01/309060195/Bridge-union-rights-tax-measure-make-Nov-ballot-but-casino-effort-blocked?odyssey=mod|newswell|text|FRONTPAGE|p ''Detroit Free Press'',"Bridge, union rights, tax measure make Nov. ballot but casino effort blocked," September 6, 2012]</ref>
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 44: Line 101:
 
* [[2012 ballot measures]]
 
* [[2012 ballot measures]]
 
* [[Michigan 2012 ballot measures]]
 
* [[Michigan 2012 ballot measures]]
 +
 +
==External links==
 +
* [http://app.thearit.com/sam-singh/saynotoproposal6.html Reasons to Oppose Proposal 6, the 2012 Michigan International Bridge Initiative]
  
 
==Additional reading==
 
==Additional reading==
Line 53: Line 113:
 
{{2012 ballot measures}}
 
{{2012 ballot measures}}
 
{{Michigan}}
 
{{Michigan}}
[[Category:Michigan 2012 ballot measures]]
+
[[Category:Michigan 2012 ballot measures, certified]]
 
[[Category:Transportation, Michigan]]
 
[[Category:Transportation, Michigan]]
[[Category:Transportation, 2012]]
+
[[Category:Certified, transportation, 2012]]
{{michigan stub}}
+
{{certinitca2012}}

Revision as of 12:55, 2 January 2013

International Bridge Initiative
Flag of Michigan.png
Quick stats
Type:Constitutional amendment
Constitution:Michigan Constitution
Referred by:Citizens
Topic:Transportation on the ballot
Status:Defeatedd

The Michigan International Bridge Initiative was on the November 6, 2012 statewide ballot in Michigan as an initiated constitutional amendment, where it was defeated. If enacted this measure would have required voters to approve any new bridge or tunnel from Michigan to Canada. The measure was proposed by the Detroit International Bridge Co. and is being sponsored by a committee called The People Should Decide.[1][2]

Election results

See also: 2012 ballot measure election results
Michigan Proposal 6
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No2,699,55859%
Yes 1,853,127 41%
Official results from the Michigan Secretary of State.

Text of measure

The official ballot text read as follows:[3]

PROPOSAL 12-1

A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL BRIDGES AND TUNNELS

This proposal would:

  • Require the approval of a majority of voters at a statewide election and in each municipality where “new international bridges or tunnels for motor vehicles” are to be located before the State of Michigan may expend state funds or resources for acquiring land, designing, soliciting bids for, constructing, financing, or promoting new international bridges or tunnels.
  • Create a definition of "new international bridges or tunnels for motor vehicles" that means, "any bridge or tunnel which is not open to the public and serving traffic as of January 1, 2012."

Should this proposal be approved?
YES __
NO ____

Background

The Detroit International Bridge Co. filed the measure in response to a proposed project aimed at constructing a new international bridge increasing the number of lanes connecting Detroit to Windsor in Canada. The project, called the New International Trade Crossing (NITC), would compete for traffic with the Detroit International Bridge Co.'s current bridge, the Ambassador Bridge.[4]

Support

The Detroit International Bridge Co. released a number of ads either supporting the amendment or targeting the New International Trade Crossing. However, the group Michigan Truth Squad, part of the bipartisan Center for Michigan, rated all the ads "Flagrant Foul," questioning the truthfulness of their contents.[4]

Arguments

  • Founder of Washington, D.C.-based Americans for Tax Reform, Grover Norquist, voiced his support for the measure arguing that the government should not get "into the business of building bridges." Norquist says federal funds will be used to construct a U.S. customs plaza for the bridge, something he says, "is not free."[5]

Campaign contributions

In Michigan campaign finance information related to ballot measures is organized by ballot question committees. The following data was obtained from the state Campaign Finance Committee:

Committee info:

Committee Amount raised Amount spent
The People Should Decide $4,657,500.00 $4,588,552.97[6]
Total $4,657,500.00 $4,588,552.97

Opposition

As a supporter of the new bridge which would compete with Detroit International Bridge Co., Governor Rick Snyder opposes this amendment which would seriously hamper plans on the new bridge if passed.[4]

Opponents

  • Gov. Rick Snyder
  • State Rep. Rashida Tlaib[4]
  • Michigan Chamber of Commerce[7]
  • Taxpayers Against Monopolies

Arguments

  • In a press release published in September 2012, Gov. Snyder said, "While the proposal is intended to protect one company's monopoly on truck crossings between Detroit and Canada, it was sloppily written and jeopardizes ANY bridge under construction today that won't be completed by January 1, 2012, or any bridge built thereafter."[8]

Polls

See also: Polls, 2012 ballot measures
  • An EPIC-MRA poll conducted on September 8-11, 2012, found that 47 percent were in support of the measure, while 44 percent were opposed, and another 9% were undecided. The poll was based on a poll of 600 likely voters and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percent.[9]
Legend

     Position is ahead and at or over 50%     Position is ahead or tied, but under 50%

Date of Poll Pollster In favor Opposed Undecided Number polled
September 8-11, 2012 EPIC-MRA 47% 44% 9% 600

Path to the ballot

See also: Michigan signature requirements

In order to place the measure on the November 2012 ballot supporters were required to collect a minimum of 322,609 valid signatures by July 9, 2012.

Following a stalemate vote in the Board of State Canvassers, the measure was taken to the Michigan Supreme Court where it was certified for the ballot.[10]

See also

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

External links

Additional reading

References