Difference between revisions of "New Hampshire Income Tax Amendment, CACR 13 (2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - 'an {{lrcafull' to 'a {{lrcafull')
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Currently the state of New Hampshire charges some personal income taxes: the gambling winnings tax that assesses a 10 percent levy on winnings of $600 or more and a 5 percent tax on dividends and interest.<ref name="ULFeb8"/>
 
Currently the state of New Hampshire charges some personal income taxes: the gambling winnings tax that assesses a 10 percent levy on winnings of $600 or more and a 5 percent tax on dividends and interest.<ref name="ULFeb8"/>
 +
 +
The measure states: "No new tax shall be levied, directly or indirectly, upon a person’s income, from whatever source it is derived."<ref name="UL1172012"/>
 +
 +
Current states without a state income tax include: Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and Wyoming.
  
 
==Support==
 
==Support==
 
[[New Hampshire House of Representatives|House Speaker]] [[William O'Brien]], who co-sponsored the proposed measure, said, "The point of this amendment is to avoid this state being changed. We're the only state in the Northeast that doesn't charge an income tax, and I want to keep it that way."<ref name="ULFeb8"/>
 
[[New Hampshire House of Representatives|House Speaker]] [[William O'Brien]], who co-sponsored the proposed measure, said, "The point of this amendment is to avoid this state being changed. We're the only state in the Northeast that doesn't charge an income tax, and I want to keep it that way."<ref name="ULFeb8"/>
 +
 +
"When we’re talking about changing the constitution, we are talking about our legacy. We are one of the last oases where, as a state, your personal income is not taxed," said [[Frank Sapareto|Rep. Frank Sapareto]].<ref name="ULFeb8"/>
 +
 +
==Opposition==
 +
Opponents of the proposed measure argue that the measure is too broadly written and could result in litigation. Additionally, opponents note that the measure may tie lawmakers' hands. [[Susan Almy|Rep. Susan Almy]] said, "It is trying to make sure you couldn’t put an income tax in but, in the process, it is also stopping probably any future change in business taxes or any future change in any other tax we may have."<ref name="UL1172012">[http://www.unionleader.com/article/20120117/NEWS06/701179969 ''Union Leader'',"NH House to decide on state income tax ban," January 17, 2012]</ref>
  
 
==Path to the ballot==
 
==Path to the ballot==

Revision as of 11:13, 17 January 2012

New Hampshire Constitution
Flag of New Hampshire.png
Part First
Part Second
House
Senate
Executive
Council
Secretary
County Treasurer
Judiciary
Clerks
Encouragement
Oaths
The New Hampshire Income Tax Amendment may appear on the November 2012 ballot in New Hampshire as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment. The proposed measure, filed as Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution 13, would ban new taxes on personal income.[1]

Currently the state of New Hampshire charges some personal income taxes: the gambling winnings tax that assesses a 10 percent levy on winnings of $600 or more and a 5 percent tax on dividends and interest.[1]

The measure states: "No new tax shall be levied, directly or indirectly, upon a person’s income, from whatever source it is derived."[2]

Current states without a state income tax include: Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and Wyoming.

Support

House Speaker William O'Brien, who co-sponsored the proposed measure, said, "The point of this amendment is to avoid this state being changed. We're the only state in the Northeast that doesn't charge an income tax, and I want to keep it that way."[1]

"When we’re talking about changing the constitution, we are talking about our legacy. We are one of the last oases where, as a state, your personal income is not taxed," said Rep. Frank Sapareto.[1]

Opposition

Opponents of the proposed measure argue that the measure is too broadly written and could result in litigation. Additionally, opponents note that the measure may tie lawmakers' hands. Rep. Susan Almy said, "It is trying to make sure you couldn’t put an income tax in but, in the process, it is also stopping probably any future change in business taxes or any future change in any other tax we may have."[2]

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the New Hampshire constitution

In order for the state legislature to place a proposed constitutional amendment on the statewide ballot, both chambers of the state legislature must approve doing so by a vote in each house of at least 60%. Once any such constitutional amendment is on the ballot, the state's voters must approve it by a 2/3 vote for it to pass.

See also

External links

References