PGI logo cropped.png
Congressional Millionaire’s Club
The Personal Gain Index shines a light on how members of Congress benefit during their tenure.





Difference between revisions of "New Hampshire Income Tax Amendment, CACR 13 (2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Path to the ballot)
(External links)
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
* [http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_Status/bill_status.aspx?lsr=340&sy=2011&sortoption=&txtsessionyear=2011&ddlsponsors=376610 Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution 13 (status)]
+
* [http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/bill_status.aspx?lsr=340&sy=2012&sortoption=billnumber&txtsessionyear=2012&txtbillnumber=cacr13 Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution 13 (status)]
 
* [http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2011/CACR0013.html Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution 13 (text)]
 
* [http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2011/CACR0013.html Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution 13 (text)]
  

Revision as of 10:37, 27 January 2012

New Hampshire Constitution
Flag of New Hampshire.png
Part First
Part Second
House
Senate
Executive
Council
Secretary
County Treasurer
Judiciary
Clerks
Encouragement
Oaths
The New Hampshire Income Tax Amendment may appear on the November 2012 ballot in New Hampshire as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment. The proposed measure, filed as Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution 13, would ban new taxes on personal income.[1]

Currently the state of New Hampshire charges some personal income taxes: the gambling winnings tax that assesses a 10 percent levy on winnings of $600 or more and a 5 percent tax on dividends and interest.[1]

The measure states: "No new tax shall be levied, directly or indirectly, upon a person’s income, from whatever source it is derived."[2]

Current states without a state income tax include: Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington and Wyoming.

Support

House Speaker William O'Brien, who co-sponsored the proposed measure, said, "The point of this amendment is to avoid this state being changed. We're the only state in the Northeast that doesn't charge an income tax, and I want to keep it that way."[1]

"When we’re talking about changing the constitution, we are talking about our legacy. We are one of the last oases where, as a state, your personal income is not taxed," said Rep. Frank Sapareto.[1]

Opposition

Opponents of the proposed measure argue that the measure is too broadly written and could result in litigation. Rep. Mary Cooney said the amendment leaves too much room for interpretation as to what is included in "a new tax."[3] Additionally, opponents note that the measure may tie lawmakers' hands. Rep. Susan Almy said, "It is trying to make sure you couldn’t put an income tax in but, in the process, it is also stopping probably any future change in business taxes or any future change in any other tax we may have."[2]

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the New Hampshire constitution

In order for the state legislature to place a proposed constitutional amendment on the statewide ballot, both chambers of the state legislature must approve doing so by a vote in each house of at least 60%. Once any such constitutional amendment is on the ballot, the state's voters must approve it by a 2/3 vote for it to pass.

On January 18, 2012 the New Hampshire House of Representatives voted 257-101 in favor of referring the proposed measure to the 2012 ballot.[4]

See also

External links

References