Difference between revisions of "Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - ""," to ","")
 
(26 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}'''Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor''' is a [[California]]-based law firm that specializes in ballot measure and election litigation.<ref name=mercury>[http://www.mercurynews.com/valley/ci_12877219?nclick_check=1 ''Mercury News'', "Cupertino joins battle against plan to divert local gas tax to state fund", July 20, 2009]</ref>
+
{{tnr}}'''Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor''' is a [[California]]-based law firm that includes a speciality practice in ballot measure and election litigation.<ref name=mercury>[http://www.mercurynews.com/valley/ci_12877219?nclick_check=1 ''Mercury News'', "Cupertino joins battle against plan to divert local gas tax to state fund," July 20, 2009]</ref>
  
 
==Ballot measure campaigns==
 
==Ballot measure campaigns==
  
 
===2010===
 
===2010===
 +
{{vendor legend}}
  
* [[California Taxpayers Right to Vote Act (2010)]]
+
:: ''See also: [[Vendors and consultants to California's 2010 ballot proposition campaigns]]''
* [[California State Government Can't Take Local Government Funds Initiative (2010)]]
+
 
* [[California School Vouchers for Foster Children Initiative (2010)]]
+
In 2010, Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor provided legal services for eight of the [[California 2010 ballot propositions|statewide propositions on the California ballot]].
* [[California Continuous Coverage Auto Insurance Discount Act (2010)]]
+
 
* [[California Lottery Funding for Schools (2010)]]
+
* [[California Proposition 14, Top Two Primaries Act (June 2010)|Proposition 14]]: <span style="background-color:green; color: white">'''$649,101'''</span>
 +
* [[California Proposition 16, Supermajority Vote Required to Create a Community Choice Aggregator (June 2010)|Proposition 16]]: <span style="background-color:green; color: white">'''$1,326,627'''</span>
 +
* [[California Proposition 17 (June 2010)|Proposition 17]]: <span style="background-color:green; color: white">'''$472,087'''</span>
 +
* [[California Proposition 20, Congressional Redistricting (2010)|Proposition 20]]: <span style="background-color:green; color: white">'''$385,321'''</span>
 +
* [[California Proposition 21, Vehicle License Fee for Parks (2010)|Proposition 21]]: <span style="background-color:red; color: white">'''$13,231'''</span>
 +
* [[California Proposition 22, Ban on State Borrowing from Local Governments (2010)|Proposition 22]]: <span style="background-color:green; color: white">'''$484,070'''</span>
 +
* [[California Proposition 24, Repeal of Corporate Tax Breaks (2010)|Proposition 24]]: <span style="background-color:red; color: white">'''$210,522'''</span>
 +
* [[California Proposition 26, Supermajority Vote to Pass New Taxes and Fees (2010)|Proposition 26]]: <span style="background-color:green; color: white">'''$343,025'''</span>
 +
 
 +
===2009===
 +
 
 +
{|class="wikitable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" style="background:none" style="width:50%;"
 +
|-
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Ballot proposition
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Firm's side
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Fees received
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Citation
 +
|-
 +
| [[California Proposition 1A (May 2009)]] ([[Budget Reform Now]])
 +
| Yes
 +
| About $397,000
 +
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1315905&session=2009&view=expenditures Expenditure records of Budget Reform Now]</ref>
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
===2008===
 +
 
 +
{|class="wikitable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" style="background:none" style="width:50%;"
 +
|-
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Ballot proposition
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Firm's side
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Fees received
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Citation
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[California Proposition 7 (2008)|Proposition 7]]
 +
| No
 +
| About $654,000
 +
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1304245&session=2007&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 7"]</ref>
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[California Proposition 91 (2008)|Proposition 91]]
 +
| No
 +
| About $27,000
 +
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1282482&session=2007&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 91"]</ref>
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[California Proposition 98, Eminent Domain and Rent Control (June 2008)|Prop 98]] and [[California Proposition 99, Rules Governing Eminent Domain (June 2008)|Prop 99]]
 +
| No on 98, Yes on 99
 +
| About $613,000
 +
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1285334&session=2007&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 98/Yes on 99"]</ref>
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
===2006===
 +
 
 +
{|class="wikitable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" style="background:none" style="width:50%;"
 +
|-
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Ballot proposition
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Firm's side
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Fees received
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Citation
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[California Proposition 87 (2006)|Proposition 87]]
 +
| No
 +
| About $651,700
 +
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1282414&session=2005&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 87"]</ref>
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[California Proposition 88 (2006)|Proposition 88]]
 +
| Yes
 +
| About $111,000
 +
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1283706&session=2005&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 7"]</ref>
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
===2005===
 +
 
 +
{|class="wikitable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" style="background:none" style="width:50%;"
 +
|-
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Ballot proposition
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Firm's side
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Fees received
 +
! style="background-color:#00008B; color: white;" | Citation
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| [[California Proposition 74 (2005)|Prop 74]] and [[California Proposition 76 (2005)|Prop 76]]
 +
| Yes
 +
| About $1,071,200
 +
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1273022&session=2005&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "Yes on 74 and 76"]</ref>
 +
 
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
==See also==
 +
 
 +
* [[California political consultants]]
 +
* [[Vendors and consultants to California's 2010 ballot proposition campaigns]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
Line 16: Line 111:
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
<references/>
+
{{reflist}}
  
{{california stub}}
+
{{sbm stub}}
  
 
[[Category:California]]
 
[[Category:California]]

Latest revision as of 06:56, 20 March 2014

Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor is a California-based law firm that includes a speciality practice in ballot measure and election litigation.[1]

Ballot measure campaigns

2010

Legend:
Worked for yes campaign
Worked for no campaign


See also: Vendors and consultants to California's 2010 ballot proposition campaigns

In 2010, Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor provided legal services for eight of the statewide propositions on the California ballot.

2009

Ballot proposition Firm's side Fees received Citation
California Proposition 1A (May 2009) (Budget Reform Now) Yes About $397,000 [2]

2008

Ballot proposition Firm's side Fees received Citation
Proposition 7 No About $654,000 [3]
Proposition 91 No About $27,000 [4]
Prop 98 and Prop 99 No on 98, Yes on 99 About $613,000 [5]

2006

Ballot proposition Firm's side Fees received Citation
Proposition 87 No About $651,700 [6]
Proposition 88 Yes About $111,000 [7]

2005

Ballot proposition Firm's side Fees received Citation
Prop 74 and Prop 76 Yes About $1,071,200 [8]

See also

External links

References


BallotMeasureFinal badge.png
This state ballot measure article is a stub. You can help people learn by expanding it.