Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(2008)
(2008)
Line 40: Line 40:
 
| About $654,000
 
| About $654,000
 
| <ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1304245&session=2007&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 7"]</ref>
 
| <ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1304245&session=2007&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 7"]</ref>
 +
 +
|-
 +
| [[California Proposition 91 (2008)|Proposition 91]]
 +
| No
 +
| About $27,000
 +
| <ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1282482&session=2007&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 91"]</ref>
  
 
|-
 
|-

Revision as of 08:58, 31 December 2009

Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor is a California-based law firm that includes a speciality practice in ballot measure and election litigation.[1]

Ballot measure campaigns

2010

2009

Ballot proposition Firm's side Fees received Citation
California Proposition 1A (May 2009) (Budget Reform Now) Yes About $397,000 [2]

2008

Ballot proposition Firm's side Fees received Citation
Proposition 7 No About $654,000 [3]
Proposition 91 No About $27,000 [4]
Prop 98 and Prop 99 No on 98, Yes on 99 About $613,000 [5]

External links

References

  1. Mercury News, "Cupertino joins battle against plan to divert local gas tax to state fund", July 20, 2009
  2. Expenditure records of Budget Reform Now
  3. Expenditure records of "No on 7"
  4. Expenditure records of "No on 91"
  5. Expenditure records of "No on 98/Yes on 99"

Flag of California.png

This California-related article is a stub. You can help people learn about California politics by expanding it.