Difference between revisions of "Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - '[[California Proposition 16 (June 2010)|' to '[[California Proposition 16, Supermajority Vote Required to Create a Community Choice Aggregator (June 2010)|')
m (Text replace - ""," to ","")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}'''Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor''' is a [[California]]-based law firm that includes a speciality practice in ballot measure and election litigation.<ref name=mercury>[http://www.mercurynews.com/valley/ci_12877219?nclick_check=1 ''Mercury News'', "Cupertino joins battle against plan to divert local gas tax to state fund", July 20, 2009]</ref>
+
{{tnr}}'''Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor''' is a [[California]]-based law firm that includes a speciality practice in ballot measure and election litigation.<ref name=mercury>[http://www.mercurynews.com/valley/ci_12877219?nclick_check=1 ''Mercury News'', "Cupertino joins battle against plan to divert local gas tax to state fund," July 20, 2009]</ref>
  
 
==Ballot measure campaigns==
 
==Ballot measure campaigns==
Line 31: Line 31:
 
| Yes
 
| Yes
 
| About $397,000
 
| About $397,000
| <ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1315905&session=2009&view=expenditures Expenditure records of Budget Reform Now]</ref>
+
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1315905&session=2009&view=expenditures Expenditure records of Budget Reform Now]</ref>
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 47: Line 47:
 
| No
 
| No
 
| About $654,000
 
| About $654,000
| <ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1304245&session=2007&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 7"]</ref>
+
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1304245&session=2007&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 7"]</ref>
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 53: Line 53:
 
| No  
 
| No  
 
| About $27,000
 
| About $27,000
| <ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1282482&session=2007&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 91"]</ref>
+
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1282482&session=2007&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 91"]</ref>
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 59: Line 59:
 
| No on 98, Yes on 99
 
| No on 98, Yes on 99
 
| About $613,000
 
| About $613,000
| <ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1285334&session=2007&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 98/Yes on 99"]</ref>
+
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1285334&session=2007&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 98/Yes on 99"]</ref>
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 75: Line 75:
 
| No
 
| No
 
| About $651,700
 
| About $651,700
| <ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1282414&session=2005&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 87"]</ref>
+
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1282414&session=2005&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 87"]</ref>
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 81: Line 81:
 
| Yes
 
| Yes
 
| About $111,000
 
| About $111,000
| <ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1283706&session=2005&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 7"]</ref>
+
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1283706&session=2005&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "No on 7"]</ref>
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 97: Line 97:
 
| Yes
 
| Yes
 
| About $1,071,200
 
| About $1,071,200
| <ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1273022&session=2005&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "Yes on 74 and 76"]</ref>
+
|<ref>[http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1273022&session=2005&view=expenditures Expenditure records of "Yes on 74 and 76"]</ref>
  
 
|}
 
|}
Line 113: Line 113:
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
  
{{california stub}}
+
{{sbm stub}}
  
 
[[Category:California]]
 
[[Category:California]]

Latest revision as of 07:56, 20 March 2014

Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor is a California-based law firm that includes a speciality practice in ballot measure and election litigation.[1]

Ballot measure campaigns

2010

Legend:
Worked for yes campaign
Worked for no campaign


See also: Vendors and consultants to California's 2010 ballot proposition campaigns

In 2010, Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor provided legal services for eight of the statewide propositions on the California ballot.

2009

Ballot proposition Firm's side Fees received Citation
California Proposition 1A (May 2009) (Budget Reform Now) Yes About $397,000 [2]

2008

Ballot proposition Firm's side Fees received Citation
Proposition 7 No About $654,000 [3]
Proposition 91 No About $27,000 [4]
Prop 98 and Prop 99 No on 98, Yes on 99 About $613,000 [5]

2006

Ballot proposition Firm's side Fees received Citation
Proposition 87 No About $651,700 [6]
Proposition 88 Yes About $111,000 [7]

2005

Ballot proposition Firm's side Fees received Citation
Prop 74 and Prop 76 Yes About $1,071,200 [8]

See also

External links

References


BallotMeasureFinal badge.png
This state ballot measure article is a stub. You can help people learn by expanding it.