Difference between revisions of "North Dakota Prevention of Animal Cruelty Initiative, Measure 5 (2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - "were it was '''defeated'''" to "where it was '''defeated'''")
m (Path to the ballot: Fixed spelling error.)
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
  status = {{defeated}}|
 
  status = {{defeated}}|
 
}}{{tnr}}
 
}}{{tnr}}
The '''North Dakota Prevention of Animal Cruelty Initiative''' was on the [[North Dakota 2012 ballot measures|2012 ballot]] in [[North Dakota]] as an {{issfull}} where it was '''defeated'''.  If enacted the measure would have made it a class C felony for an individual to maliciously harm a living dog, cat or horse.  The measure also would have created some exemptions from the law, including agricultural workers, veterinarians, scientific researchers, and hunters.<ref>[http://www.kqcd.com/News_Stories.asp?news=56070 ''KQCD-TV'' "Petition for Animal Cruelty Ballot Measure Approved," March 27, 2012]</ref>
+
The '''North Dakota Prevention of Animal Cruelty Initiative''' was on the [[North Dakota 2012 ballot measures|2012 ballot]] in [[North Dakota]] as an {{issfull}}, where it was '''defeated'''.  If enacted the measure would have made it a class C felony for an individual to maliciously harm a living dog, cat or horse.  The measure also would have created some exemptions from the law, including agricultural workers, veterinarians, scientific researchers, and hunters.<ref>[http://www.kqcd.com/News_Stories.asp?news=56070 ''KQCD-TV'' "Petition for Animal Cruelty Ballot Measure Approved," March 27, 2012]</ref>
 
==Election results==
 
==Election results==
 
:: ''See also: [[2012 ballot measure election results]]''
 
:: ''See also: [[2012 ballot measure election results]]''
''Election results will be posted here throughout the day on November 7 and in the days to come as additional votes are counted.''
 
  
 
{{Short outcome
 
{{Short outcome
 
| title = North Dakota Measure 5
 
| title = North Dakota Measure 5
| yes = 108,925
+
| yes = 109,395
| yespct = 34.60
+
| yespct = 34.63
| no = 205,845
+
| no = 206,546
| nopct = 65.40
+
| nopct = 65.37
 
| image = {{Defeated}}
 
| image = {{Defeated}}
 
| unresolved =  
 
| unresolved =  
Line 25: Line 24:
 
[[Category:Defeated, general, 2012]]
 
[[Category:Defeated, general, 2012]]
  
:''These results are from the [http://results.sos.nd.gov/resultsSW.aspx?text=BQ&type=SW&map=CTY North Dakota Secretary of State] with 426 of 426 precincts reporting.''
+
''Officials results obtained from the [http://results.sos.nd.gov/resultsSW.aspx?text=BQ&type=SW&map=CTY North Dakota Secretary of State].''
  
 
==Text of measure==
 
==Text of measure==
Line 38: Line 37:
  
 
==Support==
 
==Support==
North Dakotans to Stop Animal Cruelty led the campaign to pass the measure. They said that the reason for limiting the initiative to protecting three species is to keep the law specific in aiming to prevent the worst kinds of animal cruelty.<ref name="WDAY">[http://www.wday.com/event/article/id/70225/ ''WDAY'',"North Dakota group urges to vote “No,” hoping for more animal rights," October 17, 2012]</ref>
+
North Dakotans to Stop Animal Cruelty led the campaign to pass the measure. They said that the reason for limiting the initiative to protecting three species was to keep the law specific in aiming to prevent the worst kinds of animal cruelty.<ref name="WDAY">[http://www.wday.com/event/article/id/70225/ ''WDAY'',"North Dakota group urges to vote “No,” hoping for more animal rights," October 17, 2012]</ref>
  
 
==Opposition==
 
==Opposition==
The North Dakota Animal Stewards opposed the measure on the grounds that it does not protect against other common forms of animal abuse, like neglect and malnourishment. They also said that they would prefer a law that protects all animals, rather than only cats, dogs, and horses.<ref name="WDAY"/>
+
The North Dakota Animal Stewards opposed the measure on the grounds that it did not protect against other common forms of animal abuse, like neglect and malnourishment. They also said that they would have preferred a law that protects all animals, rather than only cats, dogs, and horses.<ref name="WDAY"/>
  
 
==Path to the ballot==
 
==Path to the ballot==
Line 48: Line 47:
 
In order to qualify the initiative for the 2012 ballot supporters were required to collect a minimum of 13,452 valid signatures by [[BC2012#August|August 8, 2012]].
 
In order to qualify the initiative for the 2012 ballot supporters were required to collect a minimum of 13,452 valid signatures by [[BC2012#August|August 8, 2012]].
  
According to reports, supporters turned in around 25,000 signed petitions on [[BC2012#August|August 7, 2012]]. The Secretary of State has until [[BC2012#September|September 10]] to very the signatures.<ref>[http://www.thedickinsonpress.com/event/article/id/60358/ ''Dickinson Press'' "Initiative would make animal cruelty a felony," August 8, 2012]</ref>
+
According to reports, supporters turned in around 25,000 signed petitions on [[BC2012#August|August 7, 2012]]. The Secretary of State had until [[BC2012#September|September 10]] to verify the signatures.<ref>[http://www.thedickinsonpress.com/event/article/id/60358/ ''Dickinson Press'' "Initiative would make animal cruelty a felony," August 8, 2012]</ref>
  
On Tuesday, [[BC2012#September|September 4, 2012]], Secretary of State [[Al Jaeger]] announced that sufficient signatures had been gathered and that the measure was qualified for the ballot.<ref>[http://www.wday.com/event/article/id/68464/group/homepage/ ''Associated Press'',"UPDATE Eight NDSU football players charged with petition fraud," September 4, 2012]</ref>
+
On Tuesday, [[BC2012#September|September 4, 2012]], Secretary of State [[Al Jaeger]] announced that sufficient signatures had been gathered and that the measure qualified for the ballot.<ref>[http://www.wday.com/event/article/id/68464/group/homepage/ ''Associated Press'',"UPDATE Eight NDSU football players charged with petition fraud," September 4, 2012]</ref>
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 69: Line 68:
 
[[Category:Treatment of animals, North Dakota]]
 
[[Category:Treatment of animals, North Dakota]]
 
[[Category:Certified, treatment of animals, 2012]]
 
[[Category:Certified, treatment of animals, 2012]]
{{North Dakota stub}}
 
 
{{certinitstat2012}}
 
{{certinitstat2012}}

Revision as of 14:54, 29 January 2014

Prevention of Animal Cruelty Initiative
Flag of North Dakota.png
Click here to read the latest news on ballot measures around the country
Quick stats
Type:Constitutional amendment
Constitution:North Dakota Constitution
Referred by:Citizens
Topic:Treatment of animals
Status:Defeatedd

The North Dakota Prevention of Animal Cruelty Initiative was on the 2012 ballot in North Dakota as an initiated state statute, where it was defeated. If enacted the measure would have made it a class C felony for an individual to maliciously harm a living dog, cat or horse. The measure also would have created some exemptions from the law, including agricultural workers, veterinarians, scientific researchers, and hunters.[1]

Election results

See also: 2012 ballot measure election results
North Dakota Measure 5
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No206,54665.37%
Yes 109,395 34.63%

Officials results obtained from the North Dakota Secretary of State.

Text of measure

The official ballot text read as follows:[2]

Initiated Statutory Measure No. 5

This initiated statutory measure would create section 36-21.1-02.1 of the North Dakota Century Code. This measure would make it a class C felony for an individual to maliciously and intentionally burn, poison, crush, suffocate, impale, drown, blind, skin, beat to death, drag to death, exsanguinate, disembowel, or dismember any living dog, cat or horse and provide a court with certain sentencing options. The measure would not apply to production agriculture, or to lawful activities of hunters and trappers, licensed veterinarians, scientific researchers, or to individuals engaged in lawful defense of life or property.

YES — means you approve the measure summarized above.

NO — means you reject the measure summarized above.

Support

North Dakotans to Stop Animal Cruelty led the campaign to pass the measure. They said that the reason for limiting the initiative to protecting three species was to keep the law specific in aiming to prevent the worst kinds of animal cruelty.[3]

Opposition

The North Dakota Animal Stewards opposed the measure on the grounds that it did not protect against other common forms of animal abuse, like neglect and malnourishment. They also said that they would have preferred a law that protects all animals, rather than only cats, dogs, and horses.[3]

Path to the ballot

See also: North Dakota signature requirements

In order to qualify the initiative for the 2012 ballot supporters were required to collect a minimum of 13,452 valid signatures by August 8, 2012.

According to reports, supporters turned in around 25,000 signed petitions on August 7, 2012. The Secretary of State had until September 10 to verify the signatures.[4]

On Tuesday, September 4, 2012, Secretary of State Al Jaeger announced that sufficient signatures had been gathered and that the measure qualified for the ballot.[5]

See also

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

External links

References