For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.
Ohio Immigration Reform Initiative (2011)
Revision as of 11:30, 5 January 2012 by Bailey Ludlam
|Not on Ballot|
| This measure did not or |
will not appear on a ballot
- The Ohio proposal was sponsored by Butler County Sheriff Richard K. Jones and Rep. Courtney Combs.
- Sen. Tim Grendell was also supportive of the proposed measure: "If they are getting services in Ohio they are not legally entitled to and taxpayers are paying for this, we need to stop it. If thousands of people were violating a particular law, Ohioans would want to stop it."
- League of United Latin American Citizens of Ohio (LULAC) opposed the proposed initiative. Prior to the formal proposal of the initiative Gov. Ted Strickland said he would veto any Arizona-like bill.
- A week following the announcement of the proposed initiative Jason Riveiro, state director of the LULAC, sent a message to Butler County Sheriff Richard Jones, a sponsor of the initiative, calling his actions a "disgrace the integrity of the office and of the position you hold as a leader in your community." LULAC argues, "...anti-immigration legislation negatively affects local housing markets. Immigrants and their families purchase and lease homes. When people leave, properties are left vacant. Vacant houses lower the values of other homes in neighborhoods. Less property tax can be gained from communities in decline than from vibrant and growing neighborhoods. Local tax revenues from sales and pay roll will also disappear because the very immigrants you seek to eliminate from local economic markets also generate those taxes."
- See also: Polls, 2011 ballot measures
- According to a May 2010 poll conducted on behalf of America’s Voice, an immigration advocacy group, found that 67% of both Ohioans and respondents at large approved such a measure. A total of 400 registered voters in Ohio, Arkansas, Missouri and Colorado were polled. According to the poll, after polled voters considered criticisms, 57% of Ohioans still supported the measure because according to the report voters want immigrants to be required to pay taxes.
- A June 22-27 poll by Quinnipiac University revealed that approximately 45% of polled voters supported an Ohio immigration law like Arizona's 2010 reform, 35% were opposed and 20% were undecided. According to reports 1,107 registered Ohio voters were polled. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
|Date of Poll||Pollster||In favor||Opposed||Undecided||Number polled|
|June 22-27, 2010||Quinnipiac University poll||45%||35%||20%||1,107|
- Middletown Journal,"Border visit boosts resolve for immigration reform in Ohio," May 26, 2010
- Middletown Journal,"Sheriff, lawmaker meet with Arizona immigration reform advocate," May 24, 2010
- The Washington Times,"Ohio lawman seeks to put Arizona-type initiative to vote," May 4, 2010
- HispanicOhio.com,"Ohio lawmaker pushes for state immigration reform," November 24, 2010
- Dayton Daily News,"Sheriff, lawmaker push for immigration ballot issue," April 30, 2010
- WKYC,"Ohioans could vote on Arizona-like immigration law," June 11, 2010
- The Oxford Press,"Leader of Latin American group blasts immigration proposal," May 11, 2010
- Dayton Daily News,"Supporters of Arizona-like immigration law focus on 2011," May 11, 2010
- Middletown Journal,"Poll: Ohioans back immigration reform," May 11, 2010
- The Oxford Press,"Poll: Ohio voters lean toward Arizona immigration law," June 30, 2010