Difference between revisions of "Ohio Measure 3, Casino Gambling (2006)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}{{OHConstitution}}{{Gambling}}'''Ohio Ballot Measure 3''' was on the [[Ohio 2006 ballot measures|November 7, 2006 ballot]] in [[Ohio]] as an {{icafull}}, where it was '''defeated'''.
+
{{tnr}}{{Gambling}}'''Ohio Ballot Measure 3''' was on the [[Ohio 2006 ballot measures|November 7, 2006 ballot]] in [[Ohio]] as an {{icafull}}, where it was '''defeated'''.
  
 
==Election results==
 
==Election results==
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
==Text of the proposal==
 
==Text of the proposal==
The language that appeared on the ballot:
+
The language that appeared on the ballot said:
 
+
{| style="width:60%; background:#FFFDD0; margin-top:.1em; border:.5px solid #cccccc; solid;"
This amendment to the Constitution would:
+
|color:#000"|
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| This amendment to the Constitution would:
  
 
- Permit up to 31,500 slot machines at seven horse racing tracks and at two Cleveland non-track locations. Permit expanded gaming in the four Cuyahoga County locations if approved by the county's voters.
 
- Permit up to 31,500 slot machines at seven horse racing tracks and at two Cleveland non-track locations. Permit expanded gaming in the four Cuyahoga County locations if approved by the county's voters.
Line 31: Line 34:
 
A majority yes vote is necessary for passage.<Ref>[http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legismgt/elect/dbintro.htm National Conference of State Legislatures Ballot Measures Database]</ref>
 
A majority yes vote is necessary for passage.<Ref>[http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legismgt/elect/dbintro.htm National Conference of State Legislatures Ballot Measures Database]</ref>
  
 +
|}
  
 
==Donors pro and con==
 
==Donors pro and con==

Revision as of 13:25, 26 September 2011

Voting on Gambling
Roulette.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
Local Measures
Ohio Ballot Measure 3 was on the November 7, 2006 ballot in Ohio as an initiated constitutional amendment, where it was defeated.

Election results

Measure 3
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No2,286,84056.6%
Yes 1,753,452 43.4%

Text of the proposal

The language that appeared on the ballot said:

This amendment to the Constitution would:

- Permit up to 31,500 slot machines at seven horse racing tracks and at two Cleveland non-track locations. Permit expanded gaming in the four Cuyahoga County locations if approved by the county's voters.

- Distribute the revenues as follows:

-- 55% to the slot and casino owners and operators.

-- 30% to the Board of Regents for college scholarships and grants to eligible students and administration of the program.

-- The remaining revenues to be divided among local governments, race tracks for purse money, gambling addiction services, and

-- The administration of the Gaming Integrity Commission comprised of five members appointed by the governor and the majority legislative leaders.

The moneys provided by this amendment are to supplement and not supplant existing and future constitutional obligations to post-secondary education and local governments.

A majority yes vote is necessary for passage.[1]

Donors pro and con

A total of $28.4 million was spent pro and con on Measure 3, with nearly all of that ($27.2 million) coming from the unsuccessful pro-committee.

Yes on 3

The top donors to the "Yes on 3" committee were:

  • The Ohio Legacy Fund, $3.5 million.
  • Jacobs Entertainment, $2.9 million.
  • Forest City Enterprises, $2.8 million.
  • MTR Gaming Group, $2.7 million.
  • Delaware North Gaming, $2.6 million.
  • Heartland Jockey Club, $2.6 million.
  • Penn National Gaming, $2.6 million.
  • Riverdown Race Track, $2.6 million.
  • Thistledown, $2.6 million.
  • Northfield Park, $1.2 million.[2]

Vote No to Slots

The top donors to the opposition campaign were:

  • Carl Linder, $500,000.
  • Wolfe Enterprises, $150,000.
  • Nork, Inc. $100,000.
  • Nationwide Mutual Insurance, $100,000.

See also

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

References