Difference between revisions of "Olivet City General Operations Levy Addition (November 2010)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with 'A '''Olivet City General Operations Levy Addition''' measure will be on the November 2, 2010 ballot in the city of Olivet, which …')
 
(updated election)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''Olivet City General Operations Levy Addition''' measure will be on the [[November 2, 2010 ballot measures in Michigan|November 2, 2010]] ballot in the city of Olivet, which is in [[Eaton County, Michigan ballot measures|Eaton County]].
+
A '''Olivet City General Operations Levy Addition''' measure was on the [[November 2, 2010 ballot measures in Michigan|November 2, 2010]] ballot in the city of Olivet, which is in [[Eaton County, Michigan ballot measures|Eaton County]].
  
This measure seeks to levy an additional tax at a rate of $1.73 per $1,000 of assessed property value for a further five years in order to help with general city funds.<ref>[http://www.eatoncounty.org/Assets/County+Clerk/City+of+Olivet+Operating+Millage.pdf ''Eaton County'', November Proposal List]</ref>
+
This measure was '''approved'''
 +
* '''YES''' 358 (66.8%){{approved}}
 +
* '''NO''' 178 (33.2%)<ref>[http://db.lsj.com/community/dc/election2010/elxresults.php ''Lansing Journal'', November Election Results]</ref>
 +
 
 +
This measure sought to levy an additional tax at a rate of $1.73 per $1,000 of assessed property value for a further five years in order to help with general city funds.<ref>[http://www.eatoncounty.org/Assets/County+Clerk/City+of+Olivet+Operating+Millage.pdf ''Eaton County'', November Proposal List]</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 12:31, 11 November 2010

A Olivet City General Operations Levy Addition measure was on the November 2, 2010 ballot in the city of Olivet, which is in Eaton County.

This measure was approved

  • YES 358 (66.8%)Approveda
  • NO 178 (33.2%)[1]

This measure sought to levy an additional tax at a rate of $1.73 per $1,000 of assessed property value for a further five years in order to help with general city funds.[2]

References