Read the The Tuesday Count. New edition available now!

Difference between revisions of "On Our Terms '97 PAC v. Secretary of State of Maine"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - ""." to "."")
 
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
+
{{submit a link}}
 
* [http://www.iandrinstitute.org/New%20IRI%20Website%20Info/I&R%20Research%20and%20History/I&R%20Legal%20History/I&R%20and%20the%20Courts/Major%20Court%20Decisions/IRI%20v.%20Maine/On%20Our%20Terms%20Final%20Decision.pdf Text of decision]
 
* [http://www.iandrinstitute.org/New%20IRI%20Website%20Info/I&R%20Research%20and%20History/I&R%20Legal%20History/I&R%20and%20the%20Courts/Major%20Court%20Decisions/IRI%20v.%20Maine/On%20Our%20Terms%20Final%20Decision.pdf Text of decision]
  

Latest revision as of 13:49, 4 May 2014

Ballot law
BallotLaw final.png
State laws
Initiative law
Recall law
Statutory changes
Court cases
Lawsuit news
Ballot access rulings
Recent court cases
Petitioner access
Ballot title challenges
Superseding initiatives
Signature challenges
Laws governing
local ballot measures
On Our Terms '97 PAC v. Secretary of State of Maine is a lawsuit that was decided in 1999 by Magistrate Judge David Cohen, a judge in the United States district court for the District of Maine.[1]

Judge Cohen, in his ruling, determined that Maine's law making it illegal to pay campaign workers based on the number of signatures they collected was unconstitutional.

The case is sometimes referred to as "Initiative & Referendum Institute et al v. Secretary of State of Maine."

See also

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

References