Difference between revisions of "On Our Terms '97 PAC v. Secretary of State of Maine"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''On Our Terms '97 PAC v. Secretary of State of Maine''' is a lawsuit that was decided in 1999 by Magistrate Judge David Cohen, a judge in the United States district court for the District of [[Maine]].<ref>[http://www.ballot-access.org/2000/0101.html ''Report on decision in Ballot Access News''] January 1, 2000</ref>
+
{{law}}'''On Our Terms '97 PAC v. Secretary of State of Maine''' is a lawsuit that was decided in 1999 by Magistrate Judge David Cohen, a judge in the United States district court for the District of [[Maine]].<ref>[http://www.ballot-access.org/2000/0101.html ''Report on decision in Ballot Access News''] January 1, 2000</ref>
  
 
Judge Cohen, in his ruling, determined that Maine's law making it illegal to pay campaign workers based on the number of signatures they collected was unconstitutional.
 
Judge Cohen, in his ruling, determined that Maine's law making it illegal to pay campaign workers based on the number of signatures they collected was unconstitutional.
  
The case is sometimes referred to as "Initiative & Referendum Institute et al v. Secretary of State of Maine".
+
The case is sometimes referred to as "Initiative & Referendum Institute et al v. Secretary of State of Maine."
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
Line 11: Line 11:
 
* [[History of restrictions on paid circulators]]
 
* [[History of restrictions on paid circulators]]
 
* [[Petition blocking]]
 
* [[Petition blocking]]
 +
* [[Laws governing the initiative process in Maine]]
 +
* [[Pay-per-signature]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
+
{{submit a link}}
 
* [http://www.iandrinstitute.org/New%20IRI%20Website%20Info/I&R%20Research%20and%20History/I&R%20Legal%20History/I&R%20and%20the%20Courts/Major%20Court%20Decisions/IRI%20v.%20Maine/On%20Our%20Terms%20Final%20Decision.pdf Text of decision]
 
* [http://www.iandrinstitute.org/New%20IRI%20Website%20Info/I&R%20Research%20and%20History/I&R%20Legal%20History/I&R%20and%20the%20Courts/Major%20Court%20Decisions/IRI%20v.%20Maine/On%20Our%20Terms%20Final%20Decision.pdf Text of decision]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
<references/>
+
{{reflist}}
  
[[Category:Ballot access legal cases]]
+
[[Category:Ballot access lawsuits, Maine]]
[[Category:Initiative rights, Maine]]
+
[[Category:Direct democracy measures, Maine]]
 +
[[Category:Pay-per-signature lawsuits]]

Latest revision as of 12:49, 4 May 2014

Ballot law
BallotLaw final.png
State laws
Initiative law
Recall law
Statutory changes
Court cases
Lawsuit news
Ballot access rulings
Recent court cases
Petitioner access
Ballot title challenges
Superseding initiatives
Signature challenges
Laws governing
local ballot measures
On Our Terms '97 PAC v. Secretary of State of Maine is a lawsuit that was decided in 1999 by Magistrate Judge David Cohen, a judge in the United States district court for the District of Maine.[1]

Judge Cohen, in his ruling, determined that Maine's law making it illegal to pay campaign workers based on the number of signatures they collected was unconstitutional.

The case is sometimes referred to as "Initiative & Referendum Institute et al v. Secretary of State of Maine."

See also

External links

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

References