Read the State Legislative Tracker. New edition available now!

Oregon Marriage Measure 36 (2004)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 17:24, 13 June 2012 by JWilliams (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
Oregon Constitution
Flag of Oregon.png
Articles
PreambleIIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXXX-AXIXI-AXI-BXI-CXI-DXI-EXI-F(1)XI-F(2)XI-GXI-HXI-I(1)XI-I(2)XI-JXI-KXI-LXI-MXI-NXI-OXI-PXIIXIIIXIVXVXVIXVIIXVIII
Oregon Ballot Measure 36 was on the November 2, 2004 ballot in Oregon as an initiated constitutional amendment, where it was approved.

Election results

Measure 36
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 1,028,546 56.63%
No787,55643.37%

Ballot summary

Under state statutes, a marriage is a civil contract entered into by a male and a female who solemnize the marriage by declaring "that they take each other to be husband and wife." There was ongoing litigation at the time concerning whether the current marriage statutes were valid under the Oregon Constitution. Ballot Measure 36 added to the Oregon Constitution a statement of policy that only a marriage between one man and one woman is valid or legally recognized as a marriage.[1]

Official ballot title

The ballot title that appeared on the ballot read, "Only Marriage Between One Man And One Woman Is Valid Or Legally Recognized As Marriage".[2]

Supporters

Supporters of the measure argued that traditional family values would be under attack as long as same-sex marriage was permitted. Some argued that children raised without a mother and a father would not be emotionally or physically "healthy", and that foster children would be more likely to be placed in same-sex households if homosexual marriage was "normalized".[3]

While certain supporters pointed out that Measure 36 is not about "hate", but about promoting a common good for Oregon, others such as the Traditional Prejudices Coalition took a stronger stance, calling homosexuals a "perverted" part of society and stating that those who do not follow the Bible will "burn in hell."

Some of the other supporters included:

  • State Representative Susan Morgan
  • Stronger Families for Oregon
  • Restore America
  • Representative Wayne Krieger
  • Parents Education Association
  • Senator Roger Beyer
  • Clark Brody Retired Superintendent, Oregon Department of Education
  • Gary George, State Senator
  • Defense of Marriage Coalition
  • Family Research Council
  • City Bible Church
  • New Hope Community Church
  • Cedar Mill Bible Church

Opposition

This measure was opposed by many people and organizations, including a number of churches and religious groups, who argued that Measure 36 wrongly allowed discrimination to be a part of the Oregon Constitution. Many pointed out that "love" should be the only deciding factor in whether a marriage is considered valid.[4]

Some of those who opposed the measure include:

  • American Friends Service Committee
  • Community of Welcoming Congregations
  • Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette
  • Central Pacific Conference of the United Church of Christ
  • Religious Response Network
  • The National Organization for Women, Corvallis Chapter
  • National Association of Social Workers, Oregon Chapter
  • Administrative Council of the University Park United Methodist Church
  • Outright Libertarians
  • State Rep. Kelley Wirth
  • State Senator Vicki L. Walker
  • The Session of Southminster Presbyterian Church

Financing the campaign

Voting on
Marriage and Family
Wedding rings.jpg
Ballot Measures
By state
By year
Not on ballot
$2,455,816 was spent by the "yes" campaign and $2,967,012 was spent by the "no" campaign.[5]

Larger donors to the pro-campaign were:

  • Christian Copyright Licensing, Inc., $410,000.
  • Focus on the Family, $138,364.
  • Gateway Communications, $120,439.
  • Neil Nedelisky, $101,000.

Larger donors to the anti-campaign were:

See also

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link


External links

References


Usage

This tag is retired and should not be placed on any more pages.

Type {{ballot measure update}} at the top of the article.

</noinclude>