Difference between revisions of "Public financing of campaigns"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(arizona)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
==States==
 
==States==
 
===Arizona===
 
===Arizona===
 +
Arizona participates in a '''"Clean Elections" program''', whereby those candidates who chose to participate in the public financing option are subject to certain qualifications and spending limits, but are compensated with public funds for any amount in excess of the spending limit that an opponent raises in private contributions.<ref name="NCSL Public Financing">[http://www.ncsl.org/Default.aspx?TabId=16591 ''National Conference of State Legislatures'': "Public Financing of Campaigns"]</ref>  This policy is codified in Title 16 Chapter 6 of the Arizona state statutes governing campaign contributions and expenses:
 +
 +
<blockquote>"Whenever during a general election period a report has been
 +
filed, or other information comes to the attention of the
 +
commission, indicating that the amount a nonparticipating
 +
candidate who is not unopposed has received in
 +
contributions during the election cycle to date less the
 +
amount of expenditures the nonparticipating candidate made
 +
through the end of the primary election period exceeds the
 +
original general election spending limit, including any
 +
previous adjustments, the commission shall immediately
 +
pay from the fund to the campaign account of any
 +
participating candidate qualified for the ballot and seeking
 +
the same office as the nonparticipating candidate an amount
 +
equal to any excess of the reported difference over the
 +
general election spending limit, as previously adjusted, less
 +
six per cent for a nonparticipating candidate’s fund-raising
 +
expenses. The general election spending limit for all such
 +
participating candidates shall be adjusted by increasing it by
 +
the amount that the commission is obligated to pay to a
 +
participating candidate."<ref>[http://www.azsos.gov/cfs/publications/Campaign_Contributions.pdf ''Arizona Revised Statutes Title 16 Chapter 6'': "Campaign Contributions and Expenses §16-952 B"]</ref></blockquote>
 +
 +
However, this a "fund matching" or "triggering" program was taken to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] on the grounds that it limits the free speech of private donors.  The case of ''Arizona's Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC et al. v. Bennett, Secretary of State of Arizona, et al.'' was decided on June 27, 2011.  In the 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that the law was unconstitutional.<ref>[http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/10-238.pdf ''Arizona Free Enterprise Club v. Bennett'': Text of the Decision]</ref>  The majority ruled that public "fund matching" programs ultimately discourage non-participating candidates who chose to raise private donations from raising or spending campaign funds, and thus discourage political debate.  Several other states have public financing programs similar to Arizona's, and are now facing the issue of being shut down on this precedent.<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/28/us/politics/28campaign.html ''New York Times'': "Supreme Court Rules in Arizona Free Enterprise Club v. Bennett"]</ref>
 +
 +
In 2010, the top 10 recipients of public campaign funds were:<ref>[http://www.followthemoney.org/database/StateGlance/contributor.phtml?d=263168789 ''Follow the Money'': "Public Fund of Arizona 2010 Campaign Contributions"]</ref>
 +
 +
{{Donor recipient}}
 +
|-
 +
| {{reddot}} [[Jan Brewer]], [[Governor of Arizona|Governor]]
 +
| align="right" | $1,768,577
 +
| align="center" | {{approved}}
 +
|-
 +
| {{bluedot}} [[Terry Goddard]], [[Governor of Arizona|Governor]]
 +
| align="right" | $1,760,945
 +
| align="center" | {{defeated}}
 +
|-
 +
| {{reddot}} [[Ken Bennett]], [[Secretary of State of Arizona|Secretary of State]]
 +
| align="right" | $458,008
 +
| align="center" | {{approved}}
 +
|-
 +
| {{reddot}} [[John Huppenthal]], [[Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction|Superintendent of Public Instruction]]
 +
| align="right" | $229,679
 +
| align="center" | {{approved}}
 +
|-
 +
| {{reddot}} Brenda Burns, Arizona Corporation Commissioner
 +
| align="right" | $229,113
 +
| align="center" | {{approved}}
 +
|-
 +
| {{reddot}} [[Gary Pierce]], Arizona Corporation Commissioner
 +
| align="right" | $229,113
 +
| align="center" | {{approved}}
 +
|-
 +
| {{bluedot}} [[David Bradley]], Arizona Corporation Commissioner
 +
| align="right" | $228,711
 +
| align="center" | {{defeated}}
 +
|-
 +
| {{reddot}} Dean Martin, [[Governor of Arizona|Governor]]
 +
| align="right" | $200,501
 +
| align="center" | {{defeated}}
 +
|-
 +
| {{bluedot}} David Lujan, [[Arizona Attorney General|Attorney General]]
 +
| align="right" | $183,311
 +
| align="center" | {{defeated}}
 +
|-
 +
| {{reddot}} [[Andrew Thomas]], [[Arizona Attorney General|Attorney General]]
 +
| align="right" | $183,311
 +
| align="center" | {{defeated}}
 +
|}
 +
 +
===Arkansas===
 +
 +
===Connecticut===
 +
 +
===Florida===
 +
 +
===Hawaii===
 +
 +
===Idaho===
 +
 +
===Iowa===
  
 
===Maine===
 
===Maine===
 +
 +
===Maryland===
 +
 +
===Massachusetts===
 +
 +
===Michigan===
 +
 +
===Minnesota===
 +
 +
===Montana===
 +
 +
===Nebraska===
 +
 +
===New Jersey===
 +
 +
===New Mexico===
 +
 +
===North Carolina===
 +
 +
===Ohio===
 +
 +
===Oklahoma===
 +
 +
===Oregon===
 +
 +
===Rhode Island===
 +
 +
===Utah===
 +
 +
===Vermont===
 +
 +
===Virginia===
  
 
===Wisconsin===
 
===Wisconsin===
 +
 +
==External Links==
 +
* [http://www.ncsl.org/Default.aspx?TabId=16591 ''National Conference of State Legislatures'': "Public Financing of Campaigns: An Overview"]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 15:40, 1 August 2011

StateLegislatures icon.jpg This state legislative article is currently in the process of being built.

Some states allow candidates to use public funds while campaigning for state offices.

States

Arizona

Arizona participates in a "Clean Elections" program, whereby those candidates who chose to participate in the public financing option are subject to certain qualifications and spending limits, but are compensated with public funds for any amount in excess of the spending limit that an opponent raises in private contributions.[1] This policy is codified in Title 16 Chapter 6 of the Arizona state statutes governing campaign contributions and expenses:

"Whenever during a general election period a report has been

filed, or other information comes to the attention of the commission, indicating that the amount a nonparticipating candidate who is not unopposed has received in contributions during the election cycle to date less the amount of expenditures the nonparticipating candidate made through the end of the primary election period exceeds the original general election spending limit, including any previous adjustments, the commission shall immediately pay from the fund to the campaign account of any participating candidate qualified for the ballot and seeking the same office as the nonparticipating candidate an amount equal to any excess of the reported difference over the general election spending limit, as previously adjusted, less six per cent for a nonparticipating candidate’s fund-raising expenses. The general election spending limit for all such participating candidates shall be adjusted by increasing it by the amount that the commission is obligated to pay to a

participating candidate."[2]

However, this a "fund matching" or "triggering" program was taken to the U.S. Supreme Court on the grounds that it limits the free speech of private donors. The case of Arizona's Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC et al. v. Bennett, Secretary of State of Arizona, et al. was decided on June 27, 2011. In the 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that the law was unconstitutional.[3] The majority ruled that public "fund matching" programs ultimately discourage non-participating candidates who chose to raise private donations from raising or spending campaign funds, and thus discourage political debate. Several other states have public financing programs similar to Arizona's, and are now facing the issue of being shut down on this precedent.[4]

In 2010, the top 10 recipients of public campaign funds were:[5]

Candidate Amount Result
Republican Party Jan Brewer, Governor $1,768,577 Approveda
Democratic Party Terry Goddard, Governor $1,760,945 Defeatedd
Republican Party Ken Bennett, Secretary of State $458,008 Approveda
Republican Party John Huppenthal, Superintendent of Public Instruction $229,679 Approveda
Republican Party Brenda Burns, Arizona Corporation Commissioner $229,113 Approveda
Republican Party Gary Pierce, Arizona Corporation Commissioner $229,113 Approveda
Democratic Party David Bradley, Arizona Corporation Commissioner $228,711 Defeatedd
Republican Party Dean Martin, Governor $200,501 Defeatedd
Democratic Party David Lujan, Attorney General $183,311 Defeatedd
Republican Party Andrew Thomas, Attorney General $183,311 Defeatedd

Arkansas

Connecticut

Florida

Hawaii

Idaho

Iowa

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Montana

Nebraska

New Jersey

New Mexico

North Carolina

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Rhode Island

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Wisconsin

External Links

References