Difference between revisions of "Random sampling"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Random sampling''' is a term used when describing the process of checking the validity of the signatures filed on a petition drive. Validity is the amount of valid signatures. Some states' offices (usually [[Secretary of State]]) check a random sample of the signatures. That random sample is usually about 5%-10% of the total signatures filed.
+
'''Random sampling''' is one way of determining whether enough [[valid signature]]s have been submitted to election officials to qualify an initiative for the ballot.
  
The other way of checking signature is simply a 100% validity check. Every signature filed is checked with this method.
+
The other way of checking signature is a 100% validity check. Under this method, the "full-check method", every signature is scrutinized. States that use the random sampling method do so because:
  
{{stub}}
+
* It is less expensive to scrutinize a relatively small number of signatures than to look at every submitted signature.  For example, if 400,000 signatures were submitted, and uder a random sampling method where just 3% of signatures are scrutinized, election officials would only have to look at 12,000 signatures versus 400,000 signatures.
 +
* They believe that the random sampling method is just as accurate as the full-check method.
 +
 
 +
==States that use random sampling==
 +
 
 +
* [[California]]: [[Laws governing the initiative process in California]].
 +
* [[Oregon]]: [[Laws governing the initiative process in Oregon]].
 +
* [[Washington]]: [[Laws governing the initiative process in Washington]].
 +
 
 +
{{law stub}}
 
[[Category:Terms and definitions]]
 
[[Category:Terms and definitions]]

Revision as of 21:49, 26 June 2010

Random sampling is one way of determining whether enough valid signatures have been submitted to election officials to qualify an initiative for the ballot.

The other way of checking signature is a 100% validity check. Under this method, the "full-check method", every signature is scrutinized. States that use the random sampling method do so because:

  • It is less expensive to scrutinize a relatively small number of signatures than to look at every submitted signature. For example, if 400,000 signatures were submitted, and uder a random sampling method where just 3% of signatures are scrutinized, election officials would only have to look at 12,000 signatures versus 400,000 signatures.
  • They believe that the random sampling method is just as accurate as the full-check method.

States that use random sampling


Scalesofjustice.jpg

This law-related article is a stub. You can help people learn by expanding it.