Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "Random sampling"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(States that use random sampling)
(States that use random sampling)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
* [[California]]: [[Laws governing the initiative process in California]].
 
* [[California]]: [[Laws governing the initiative process in California]].
 
* [[Missouri]]: [[Laws governing the initiative process in Missouri]].
 
* [[Missouri]]: [[Laws governing the initiative process in Missouri]].
 +
* [[Nevada]]: [[Laws governing the initiative process in Nevada]].
 
* [[Oregon]]: [[Laws governing the initiative process in Oregon]].
 
* [[Oregon]]: [[Laws governing the initiative process in Oregon]].
 
* [[Washington]]: [[Laws governing the initiative process in Washington]].
 
* [[Washington]]: [[Laws governing the initiative process in Washington]].

Revision as of 22:54, 26 June 2010

Random sampling is one way of determining whether enough valid signatures have been submitted to election officials to qualify an initiative for the ballot.

The other way of checking signature is a 100% validity check. Under this method, the "full-check method", every signature is scrutinized. States that use the random sampling method do so because:

  • It is less expensive to scrutinize a relatively small number of signatures than to look at every submitted signature. For example, if 400,000 signatures were submitted, and uder a random sampling method where just 3% of signatures are scrutinized, election officials would only have to look at 12,000 signatures versus 400,000 signatures.
  • They believe that the random sampling method is just as accurate as the full-check method.

States that use random sampling


Scalesofjustice.jpg

This law-related article is a stub. You can help people learn by expanding it.