Difference between revisions of "Redistricting Roundup: Deadlines looming for many states in redistricting process"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(create sandbox)
 
m (Text replace - "the ''The" to "''The")
(17 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==='''[[BC2011#April|April 1, 2011]]'''===
 
==='''[[BC2011#April|April 1, 2011]]'''===
[[File:Redistricting Roundup.jpg|325px|right|link=Redistricting Roundup]]
+
 
 
'''By Geoff Pallay'''
 
'''By Geoff Pallay'''
 +
{| class="infobox" style="text-align: center; "
 +
|-
 +
| [[File:Fayetteville to the 4th New.jpg|115px]]   [[File:AR Congressional.JPG|115px]]
 +
|-
 +
| '''Figure 1'''           '''Figure 2'''
 +
|-
 +
| <hr>Figure 1 is the "Fayetteville to the 4th" map as passed<br> by the [[Arkansas House of Representatives|State House]]. Figure 2 is the current<br> Congressional map as passed after the 2000 census.
 +
|}
 +
 +
Throughout 2011, controversy has surrounded the [[Redistricting in Arkansas|Arkansas Congressional redistricting]] process. The [[Arkansas State Legislature]] is tasked with re-drawing U.S. House districts (they do not oversee state legislative districts). The deadline for the legislature to adopt maps is today, April 1, which is also the conclusion of the [[Dates of 2011 state legislative sessions|2011 legislative session]]. The [[Arkansas House of Representatives|State House]] passed a map (See ''Figure 1'') on March 31, sending it to the [[Arkansas State Senate|State Senate]]. However, the Senate is not expected to pass the measure today.
  
 +
Instead, the expectation is that the [[Arkansas General Assembly|General Assembly]] will amend the Sine Dine adjournment resolution to allow lawmakers to return after April 27 and re-open [[Redistricting in Arkansas|redistricting]] negotiations. [[Republicans]] have accused the Democratic-sponsored map of gerrymandering in favor of Democrats. The map is controversial for a "finger-shaped" 4th Congressional district that moves the city of Fayetteville from the 3rd Congressional District to the 4th. Figure 1 portrays the current district breakdown.
  
 +
The [[Arkansas State Senate|Senate]] is expected to return on Monday to continue working on the maps process.
  
 
====Lawsuits====
 
====Lawsuits====
 
+
[[File:Redistricting Roundup.jpg|325px|right|link=Redistricting Roundup]]
Overall, lawsuits pertaining to [[State Legislative and Congressional Redistricting after the 2010 Census|redistricting]] have been filed in 12 states -- [[Redistricting in Alabama|Alabama]], [[Redistricting in Arizona|Arizona]], [[Redistricting in Florida|Florida]], [[Redistricting in Georgia|Georgia]], [[Redistricting in Indiana|Indiana]], [[Redistricting in Maine|Maine]], [[Redistricting in Maryland|Maryland]], [[Redistricting in Minnesota|Minnesota]], [[Redistricting in Mississippi|Mississippi]],  [[Redistricting in Nevada|Nevada]], [[Redistricting in Oklahoma|Oklahoma]] and [[Redistricting in Texas|Texas]].  
+
This week, lawsuits were filed in [[Redistricting in Maine|Maine]] and [[Redistricting in Georgia|Georgia]]. Overall, lawsuits pertaining to [[State Legislative and Congressional Redistricting after the 2010 Census|redistricting]] have been filed in 12 states -- [[Redistricting in Alabama|Alabama]], [[Redistricting in Arizona|Arizona]], [[Redistricting in Florida|Florida]], [[Redistricting in Georgia|Georgia]], [[Redistricting in Indiana|Indiana]], [[Redistricting in Maine|Maine]], [[Redistricting in Maryland|Maryland]], [[Redistricting in Minnesota|Minnesota]], [[Redistricting in Mississippi|Mississippi]],  [[Redistricting in Nevada|Nevada]], [[Redistricting in Oklahoma|Oklahoma]] and [[Redistricting in Texas|Texas]].  
  
 
===State news===
 
===State news===
  
====Arkansas====
+
====Alaska====
 +
Two citizen organizations relating to [[Redistricting in Alaska|redistricting]] submitted maps this week. Alaskans for Fair and Equitable Redistricting (AFER) and Alaskans for Fair Redistricting (AFFR) each sent their version of legislative maps to the redistricting board for consideration. The AFER was formed by the Alaska [[Republican Party]] and interested businesses. The AFFR is a left-leaning coalition including unions and Native corporations.
  
 +
====Florida====
 +
[[Republican]] leaders in the [[Florida Legislature]] submitted [[Florida Legislative District Boundaries, Amendment 5 (2010)|Amendment 5]] and [[Florida Congressional District Boundaries, Amendment 6 (2010)|Amendment 6]] to the U.S. Department of Justice for pre-clearance.  However, along with their 1-page pre-clearance application, they submitted 11 pages of how they interpret the amendments. Critics, including the authors of the amendments, are questioning the submission, saying it "contains a number of statements that are clearly intended to undermine the intent" of the changes.
  
 +
====Georgia====
  
 +
The Legislative Black Caucus filed a lawsuit on March 28 in [[Redistricting in Georgia|Georgia]] pertaining to the formation of five specific cities in DeKalb and Fulton counties. The suit demands that the five cities -- which were alleged to create "super-majority white" municipalities -- should be dissolved for diluting minority voters and violating the [[Voting Rights Act]]. The five cities are Sandy Springs, Milton, Johns Creek, Chattahoochee Hills and Dunwoody.
 +
 +
====Illinois====
 +
{|class="wikitable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" align="right" style="background:none" style="width:355px;"
 +
|-
 +
! colspan="1" align="center" style="background-color:#008000; color: white;" | Quote of the Week
 +
|-
 +
| <blockquote>''"When I opened it up this morning and looked at it, I said this looks like someone on drugs did this with an Etch A Sketch."''<ref>[http://www.roanoke.com/politics/wb/281858 As quoted in ''The Roanoke Times'' on April 01, 2011]</ref><br>
 +
-- Brown Burton, Roanoke County resident on his impression of the proposed [[Virginia State Senate|Virginia Senate]] map. Roanoke is one of [http://www.wagnervasenate.com/Redistricting%20Meetings.htm several cities] to host public redistricting hearings.
 +
{{reflist}}</blockquote>
 +
|}
 +
[[Speaker of the House]] [[Michael Madigan]] (D) announced the formation of the House Redistricting Committee as well as a [http://www.ilhousedems.com/redistricting/ new redistricting website].  The site includes a timeline, details on the 15 public hearings that have been announced, and access to census data.  Thus far only Democrats have been named to the committee.
 +
 +
====Indiana====
 +
 +
Protesting [[Democrats]] returned to the Hoosier state this week and immediately began working on [[Redistricting in Indiana|redistricting]]. The Democratic Caucus launched a [http://www.in.gov/legislative/senate_democrats/redistricting.htm redistricting website] that is intended to promote compact districts that preserve communities of interest and protect minorities. The site will also solicit public input and promote the formation of an independent commission. Additionally, the Democratic Caucus released proposed maps for the [[Indiana State Senate|Senate]] and Congressional delegation.
 +
 +
====Iowa====
 +
The first, and perhaps final, Congressional redistricting plan for Iowa was released on March 31. The plan puts US Representatives Tom Latham (R) and Steve King (R) together in District 4 and puts Reps. Bruce Braley (D) and Dave Loebsack (D) together in the fourth district. Rep. Leonard Boswell (D) remained alone in District 3, leaving District 2 open. The state plan involves matchups between seven state senators. Notably, the plan pairs Senate President [[Jack Kibbie]] (D) with incumbent Republican [[David Johnson]] (R). In the house, the plan pairs a Republican and a Democratic incumbent, 3 districts pair Democratic incumbents and 9 pair Republican incumbents. The plan also makes 14 of the state's 100 districts open with no incumbent.
 +
 +
Overall, the Congressional plan is seen as favorable to Democrats. While the map pairs incumbents from both parties, Loebsack lives only 20 miles from District 2 and Johnson County, the Democratic stronghold of his current district. Comments from the congressional delegation can be found [http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2011/03/31/iowas-u-s-house-members-on-redistricting-proposal/ here.]
 +
 +
Ultimately, the plan is not predicted to pass, and the state will have 35 days to produce a new set of maps. In the last redistricting cycle, 2001, the second set of maps was ultimately approved. Three consecutive plans may be rejected before the decision is referred to the [[judgepedia:Iowa Supreme Court|Iowa Supreme Court.]]
 +
 +
====Louisiana====
 
{|class="wikitable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" align="right" style="background:none" style="width:300px;"
 
{|class="wikitable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" align="right" style="background:none" style="width:300px;"
 
|-
 
|-
Line 38: Line 79:
 
| align="center" | '''[[Redistricting in New Jersey|New Jersey]]'''<br> April 3
 
| align="center" | '''[[Redistricting in New Jersey|New Jersey]]'''<br> April 3
 
|-
 
|-
| ''Maps submitted for vote'': '''3'''
+
| ''Maps submitted for vote'': '''6'''
| align="center" | ([[Redistricting in Mississippi|Mississippi House]]), ([[Redistricting in Mississippi|Mississippi Senate]]), ([[Redistricting in Arkansas|Arkansas House]])
+
| align="center" | [[Status of redistricting maps after the 2010 census|MS (2), LA (3), AR (1)]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
| ''States that have completed redistricting''
 
| ''States that have completed redistricting''
Line 45: Line 86:
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
[[Redistricting in Louisiana|Louisiana]] made progress this week on its new maps, with both the [[Louisiana House of Representatives|House]] and [[Louisiana State Senate|Senate]] passing maps of their own seats and sending them to the opposite chamber. [[Louisiana House of Representatives|House]] lawmakers also passed a plan for the state board of education and for the utility regulations board. However, the still unresolved Congressional map continues to overshadow the entire process.
  
 +
Regional, racial, and partisan tensions are flaring, and that's just within the [[Louisiana State Legislature|legislature]]. Citizens have complained that their interests and wishes are being ignored in a mad rush to protect incumbents. Politicians with power bases in the north want to preserve those seats, at the expense of having to chop off the state's Southern districts significantly. Those who represent areas nearer to the shore are championing for massively redrawn northern seats that would allow greater leverage for keeping culturally and economically homogeneous areas in single seats.
  
 +
Meanwhile, [[Governor of Louisiana|Governor]] [[Bobby Jindal]] (R), in the midst of a re-election campaign, has largely stepped away from his pledge to stay out of redistricting unless asked. He has publicly commented on plans, expressing preferences for some maps, and delegated his top staffers to conduct closed door meetings with legislative [[Republicans]].
 +
 +
====Maine====
 +
 +
When local population data in [[Redistricting in Maine|Maine]] was released, it was revealed that the largest growth took place in the southern part of the state near the [[New Hampshire]] border. Legally, the [[Maine State Legislature]] is required to conduct redistricting during the year that ends in "3" after a census -- this decade, in 2013. This week, two citizens from the southern portion of the state filed a lawsuit that seeks to force legislators to conduct redistricting in 2011. Central to the complaint is information in the Census indicating Maine's two Congressional districts, which will remain as they are for the 2012 election as things stand, are out of balance and could lead to vote dilution for southern Mainers.  2010 population counts show the 1st District having 668,515 residents and the 2nd 659,846, a difference of 8,669.
 +
 +
====Michigan====
 +
 +
Legislation has been introduced in the [[Michigan State Legislature]] that would create a bipartisan commission to handle [[Redistricting in Michigan|redistricting]]. Two bills were introduced by [[Michigan State Senate|Senator]] [[Steven Bieda]] (D), which were then referred to the [[Government Operations Committee, Michigan State Senate|Government Operations and Reform Committee]]. Bieda serves as the Minority Vice Chair on the [[Redistricting Committee, Michigan State Senate|Senate redistricting committee]].
 +
 +
====Mississippi====
 +
 +
As the last official legislative day for [[Redistricting in Mississippi|Mississippi]] to draw maps and receive Justice Department clearance draws to a close, the likelihood that the state's redistricting process will become entangled in the court increases. Another unpalatable prospect looms as well – that of holding back-to-back one-year elections in [[State legislative elections, 2011|2011]] and again in 2012. Not only would that be a humiliating return to the messy aftermath of the 1990 Census, it would require money the state can ill-afford to spend. [[Speaker of the House]] [[William McCoy]] (D) continues to refuse to conference with the [[Mississippi State Senate|Senate]] on resolving his chamber's maps and insists he can find a legal avenue to bypass the Senate entirely and send his preferred map directly to the Justice Department. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats joined their House colleagues on an NAACP lawsuit.  The lawsuit names most of the top Republicans in the state in a complaint over the racial aspects of redistricting. The federal judge originally assigned to hear the case -- [[judgepedia:Daniel Jordan|Daniel Jordan]] recused himself this week after a family member began a race for the [[Mississippi State Legislature|state legislature]]. The new judge -- [[judgepedia:Carlton W. Reeves|Carlton W. Reeves]] -- is a recent appointee to the federal bench. Reeves is already under pressure to step aside as well because he served as the lead attorney for the [[Mississippi]] [[Democrats]] in the 2000 redistricting process.
 +
 +
====Missouri====
 +
 +
Early versions of the proposed Congressional [[Redistricting in Missouri|redistricting]] map have been released in Missouri. As was expected, the seat to be cut is coming from the St. Louis metropolitan area, which would be left with two U.S. House seats. Rep. Russ Carnahan appears to be the odd man out -- a scenario that was widely anticipated in the state. St. Louis officials have resisted the removal of one of its three U.S. House seats. Local census data revealed that the majority of population growth took place in the rural and suburban parts of the state. Districts 1 and 3 -- both in St. Louis -- required the greatest number of additional residents in order to reach the ideal population size of 748,615.
 +
 +
====New Jersey====
 +
It's come down to the wire for [[Redistricting in New Jersey|New Jersey]] in its process of re-drawing [[New Jersey State Legislature|state legislative]] districts. The redistricting commission is expected to vote Sunday at Noon on a final state legislative map. This week speculation surrounded maps supposedly leaked from the commission. In each version that was reportedly introduced, several incumbents would be pitted against one another. Once a final map is decided upon, candidates will have 8 days until the [[Signature requirements and deadlines for 2011 state government elections|filing deadline on April 11]] for the [[State legislative elections, 2011|2011 general election]].
 
{|class="wikitable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" align="right" style="background:none" style="width:355px;"
 
{|class="wikitable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" align="right" style="background:none" style="width:355px;"
 
|-
 
|-
 
! colspan="1" align="center" style="background-color:#008000; color: white;" | This week in redistricting
 
! colspan="1" align="center" style="background-color:#008000; color: white;" | This week in redistricting
 
|-
 
|-
| <blockquote></blockquote>
+
| <blockquote>Shades of Forrest Gump reign large in '''[[Redistricting in Pennsylvania|Pennsylvania]]'''. Reform-minded Pennsylvanians have taken a new approach to informing the citizenry about redistricting. Today marked the start of a 1,000-mile run across the state to highlight the need for reform in the redistricting process.  </blockquote>
 
|}
 
|}
 +
====North Carolina====
 +
 +
On March 31, [[Charlie Smith Dannelly]] (D) resigned from the [[Redistricting Committee, North Carolina State Senate|Senate redistricting committee]], citing scheduling conflicts. During a committee meeting on March 30, [[Senate Minority Leader]] [[Martin Nesbitt]] (D) requested that two committee members be swapped in favor of [[Dan Clodfelter]] (D) and [[Dan Blue]] (D), who both have experience with redistricting. [[Bob Rucho]] (R), chair of the committee, rejected the proposal. Public hearings will be held beginning in April.
  
 +
====North Dakota====
 +
[[Corey Mock]] (D-Grand Forks) proposed a constitutional amendment that would place a bipartisan commission in charge of state redistricting. However, on Thursday, the proposed amendment was defeated by a 69-25 margin in the [[North Dakota House of Representatives]]. Even if the measure had passed, it would not have taken effect until the next redistricting cycle.
  
 +
====Virginia====
 +
On March 29, both chambers released preliminary [http://hamptonroads.com/2011/03/virginia-redistricting-proposed-maps redistricting maps.] The maps, drawn by their respective chambers, reflect the interests of the majority parties. In the [[Virginia State Senate|senate,]] Democrats drew maps which consolidated two Republican districts in Virginia Beach and favored Democratic incumbents on the Peninsula. In the [[Virginia House of Delegates|House of Delegates,]] Republicans eliminated a [[Paula Miller|Democratic district]] in Norfolk and diluted local Democratic districts while strengthening Republican districts on the Peninsula. Notably the house plan moves democratic districts into Northern Virginia and displaces several Democrats, including House Minority Leader [[Ward Armstrong]] (D). Both maps have been sharply criticized by minority leadership.  The entire [[Virginia Legislature]] will return on April 4 to debate the new maps.
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
  
 
* [[State Legislative and Congressional Redistricting after the 2010 Census]]
 
* [[State Legislative and Congressional Redistricting after the 2010 Census]]
 +
* [[Redistricting Roundup]]
  
 
{{state news}}
 
{{state news}}
Line 65: Line 136:
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOEDITSECTION__
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 +
[[Category:Redistricting Roundup]]
 +
[[Category:Redistricting news, 2011]]
 +
[[Category:2011 front page news]]
 +
[[Category:April 2011]]
 +
[[Category:Alaska 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:Arkansas 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:Florida 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:Georgia 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:Illinois 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:Indiana 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:Iowa 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:Louisiana 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:Maine 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:Michigan 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:Missouri 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:Mississippi 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:New Jersey 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:North Carolina 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:Virginia 2011 news]]
 +
[[Category:North Dakota 2011 news]]

Revision as of 13:43, 5 June 2013

April 1, 2011

By Geoff Pallay

Fayetteville to the 4th New.jpg   AR Congressional.JPG
Figure 1           Figure 2

Figure 1 is the "Fayetteville to the 4th" map as passed
by the State House. Figure 2 is the current
Congressional map as passed after the 2000 census.

Throughout 2011, controversy has surrounded the Arkansas Congressional redistricting process. The Arkansas State Legislature is tasked with re-drawing U.S. House districts (they do not oversee state legislative districts). The deadline for the legislature to adopt maps is today, April 1, which is also the conclusion of the 2011 legislative session. The State House passed a map (See Figure 1) on March 31, sending it to the State Senate. However, the Senate is not expected to pass the measure today.

Instead, the expectation is that the General Assembly will amend the Sine Dine adjournment resolution to allow lawmakers to return after April 27 and re-open redistricting negotiations. Republicans have accused the Democratic-sponsored map of gerrymandering in favor of Democrats. The map is controversial for a "finger-shaped" 4th Congressional district that moves the city of Fayetteville from the 3rd Congressional District to the 4th. Figure 1 portrays the current district breakdown.

The Senate is expected to return on Monday to continue working on the maps process.

Lawsuits

Redistricting Roundup.jpg

This week, lawsuits were filed in Maine and Georgia. Overall, lawsuits pertaining to redistricting have been filed in 12 states -- Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada, Oklahoma and Texas.

State news

Alaska

Two citizen organizations relating to redistricting submitted maps this week. Alaskans for Fair and Equitable Redistricting (AFER) and Alaskans for Fair Redistricting (AFFR) each sent their version of legislative maps to the redistricting board for consideration. The AFER was formed by the Alaska Republican Party and interested businesses. The AFFR is a left-leaning coalition including unions and Native corporations.

Florida

Republican leaders in the Florida Legislature submitted Amendment 5 and Amendment 6 to the U.S. Department of Justice for pre-clearance. However, along with their 1-page pre-clearance application, they submitted 11 pages of how they interpret the amendments. Critics, including the authors of the amendments, are questioning the submission, saying it "contains a number of statements that are clearly intended to undermine the intent" of the changes.

Georgia

The Legislative Black Caucus filed a lawsuit on March 28 in Georgia pertaining to the formation of five specific cities in DeKalb and Fulton counties. The suit demands that the five cities -- which were alleged to create "super-majority white" municipalities -- should be dissolved for diluting minority voters and violating the Voting Rights Act. The five cities are Sandy Springs, Milton, Johns Creek, Chattahoochee Hills and Dunwoody.

Illinois

Quote of the Week
"When I opened it up this morning and looked at it, I said this looks like someone on drugs did this with an Etch A Sketch."[1]

-- Brown Burton, Roanoke County resident on his impression of the proposed Virginia Senate map. Roanoke is one of several cities to host public redistricting hearings.

Speaker of the House Michael Madigan (D) announced the formation of the House Redistricting Committee as well as a new redistricting website. The site includes a timeline, details on the 15 public hearings that have been announced, and access to census data. Thus far only Democrats have been named to the committee.

Indiana

Protesting Democrats returned to the Hoosier state this week and immediately began working on redistricting. The Democratic Caucus launched a redistricting website that is intended to promote compact districts that preserve communities of interest and protect minorities. The site will also solicit public input and promote the formation of an independent commission. Additionally, the Democratic Caucus released proposed maps for the Senate and Congressional delegation.

Iowa

The first, and perhaps final, Congressional redistricting plan for Iowa was released on March 31. The plan puts US Representatives Tom Latham (R) and Steve King (R) together in District 4 and puts Reps. Bruce Braley (D) and Dave Loebsack (D) together in the fourth district. Rep. Leonard Boswell (D) remained alone in District 3, leaving District 2 open. The state plan involves matchups between seven state senators. Notably, the plan pairs Senate President Jack Kibbie (D) with incumbent Republican David Johnson (R). In the house, the plan pairs a Republican and a Democratic incumbent, 3 districts pair Democratic incumbents and 9 pair Republican incumbents. The plan also makes 14 of the state's 100 districts open with no incumbent.

Overall, the Congressional plan is seen as favorable to Democrats. While the map pairs incumbents from both parties, Loebsack lives only 20 miles from District 2 and Johnson County, the Democratic stronghold of his current district. Comments from the congressional delegation can be found here.

Ultimately, the plan is not predicted to pass, and the state will have 35 days to produce a new set of maps. In the last redistricting cycle, 2001, the second set of maps was ultimately approved. Three consecutive plans may be rejected before the decision is referred to the Iowa Supreme Court.

Louisiana

Redistricting Facts
Total States with Lawsuits filed: 12
Next state deadline? New Jersey
April 3
Maps submitted for vote: 6 MS (2), LA (3), AR (1)
States that have completed redistricting None

Louisiana made progress this week on its new maps, with both the House and Senate passing maps of their own seats and sending them to the opposite chamber. House lawmakers also passed a plan for the state board of education and for the utility regulations board. However, the still unresolved Congressional map continues to overshadow the entire process.

Regional, racial, and partisan tensions are flaring, and that's just within the legislature. Citizens have complained that their interests and wishes are being ignored in a mad rush to protect incumbents. Politicians with power bases in the north want to preserve those seats, at the expense of having to chop off the state's Southern districts significantly. Those who represent areas nearer to the shore are championing for massively redrawn northern seats that would allow greater leverage for keeping culturally and economically homogeneous areas in single seats.

Meanwhile, Governor Bobby Jindal (R), in the midst of a re-election campaign, has largely stepped away from his pledge to stay out of redistricting unless asked. He has publicly commented on plans, expressing preferences for some maps, and delegated his top staffers to conduct closed door meetings with legislative Republicans.

Maine

When local population data in Maine was released, it was revealed that the largest growth took place in the southern part of the state near the New Hampshire border. Legally, the Maine State Legislature is required to conduct redistricting during the year that ends in "3" after a census -- this decade, in 2013. This week, two citizens from the southern portion of the state filed a lawsuit that seeks to force legislators to conduct redistricting in 2011. Central to the complaint is information in the Census indicating Maine's two Congressional districts, which will remain as they are for the 2012 election as things stand, are out of balance and could lead to vote dilution for southern Mainers. 2010 population counts show the 1st District having 668,515 residents and the 2nd 659,846, a difference of 8,669.

Michigan

Legislation has been introduced in the Michigan State Legislature that would create a bipartisan commission to handle redistricting. Two bills were introduced by Senator Steven Bieda (D), which were then referred to the Government Operations and Reform Committee. Bieda serves as the Minority Vice Chair on the Senate redistricting committee.

Mississippi

As the last official legislative day for Mississippi to draw maps and receive Justice Department clearance draws to a close, the likelihood that the state's redistricting process will become entangled in the court increases. Another unpalatable prospect looms as well – that of holding back-to-back one-year elections in 2011 and again in 2012. Not only would that be a humiliating return to the messy aftermath of the 1990 Census, it would require money the state can ill-afford to spend. Speaker of the House William McCoy (D) continues to refuse to conference with the Senate on resolving his chamber's maps and insists he can find a legal avenue to bypass the Senate entirely and send his preferred map directly to the Justice Department. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats joined their House colleagues on an NAACP lawsuit. The lawsuit names most of the top Republicans in the state in a complaint over the racial aspects of redistricting. The federal judge originally assigned to hear the case -- Daniel Jordan recused himself this week after a family member began a race for the state legislature. The new judge -- Carlton W. Reeves -- is a recent appointee to the federal bench. Reeves is already under pressure to step aside as well because he served as the lead attorney for the Mississippi Democrats in the 2000 redistricting process.

Missouri

Early versions of the proposed Congressional redistricting map have been released in Missouri. As was expected, the seat to be cut is coming from the St. Louis metropolitan area, which would be left with two U.S. House seats. Rep. Russ Carnahan appears to be the odd man out -- a scenario that was widely anticipated in the state. St. Louis officials have resisted the removal of one of its three U.S. House seats. Local census data revealed that the majority of population growth took place in the rural and suburban parts of the state. Districts 1 and 3 -- both in St. Louis -- required the greatest number of additional residents in order to reach the ideal population size of 748,615.

New Jersey

It's come down to the wire for New Jersey in its process of re-drawing state legislative districts. The redistricting commission is expected to vote Sunday at Noon on a final state legislative map. This week speculation surrounded maps supposedly leaked from the commission. In each version that was reportedly introduced, several incumbents would be pitted against one another. Once a final map is decided upon, candidates will have 8 days until the filing deadline on April 11 for the 2011 general election.

This week in redistricting
Shades of Forrest Gump reign large in Pennsylvania. Reform-minded Pennsylvanians have taken a new approach to informing the citizenry about redistricting. Today marked the start of a 1,000-mile run across the state to highlight the need for reform in the redistricting process.

North Carolina

On March 31, Charlie Smith Dannelly (D) resigned from the Senate redistricting committee, citing scheduling conflicts. During a committee meeting on March 30, Senate Minority Leader Martin Nesbitt (D) requested that two committee members be swapped in favor of Dan Clodfelter (D) and Dan Blue (D), who both have experience with redistricting. Bob Rucho (R), chair of the committee, rejected the proposal. Public hearings will be held beginning in April.

North Dakota

Corey Mock (D-Grand Forks) proposed a constitutional amendment that would place a bipartisan commission in charge of state redistricting. However, on Thursday, the proposed amendment was defeated by a 69-25 margin in the North Dakota House of Representatives. Even if the measure had passed, it would not have taken effect until the next redistricting cycle.

Virginia

On March 29, both chambers released preliminary redistricting maps. The maps, drawn by their respective chambers, reflect the interests of the majority parties. In the senate, Democrats drew maps which consolidated two Republican districts in Virginia Beach and favored Democratic incumbents on the Peninsula. In the House of Delegates, Republicans eliminated a Democratic district in Norfolk and diluted local Democratic districts while strengthening Republican districts on the Peninsula. Notably the house plan moves democratic districts into Northern Virginia and displaces several Democrats, including House Minority Leader Ward Armstrong (D). Both maps have been sharply criticized by minority leadership. The entire Virginia Legislature will return on April 4 to debate the new maps.

See also