Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "Resign-to-run law"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Refs)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Features vnt}}{{tnr}}'''Resign-to-run laws''' require officeholders to resign from their current office in order to run for another. Nationwide, five states have resign-to-run laws--[[Arizona]], [[Florida]], [[Georgia]], [[Hawaii]], and [[Texas]].  
+
{{Features vnt}}{{tnr}}'''Resign-to-run laws''' require officeholders to resign from their current office in order to run for another. Nationwide, five states have resign-to-run laws--[[Arizona]], [[Florida]], [[Georgia]], [[Hawaii]], and [[Texas]].<ref>[http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/mar/15/politicians-less-hazard-testing-waters/ ''Las Vegas Sun,'' "For politicians, less hazard in testing waters," March 15, 2011]</ref>
  
Proponents of these requirements argue that officeholders should not divide their time in office between their duties and their own political advancement. In addition, proponents worry that, absent these laws, officeholders can unfairly leverage their present position against other candidates, while retaining that position as a fallback. Opponents, on the other hand, worry that the laws disproportionately effect those for whom public service is a full-time job. For these individuals, quitting their present position to campaign may not be a financially viable option.<ref>[http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/mar/15/politicians-less-hazard-testing-waters/ ''Las Vegas Sun,'' "For politicians, less hazard in testing waters," March 15, 2011]</ref><ref>[http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/05/reform_advocates_call_for_resi.html ''PennLive.com,'' "Reform advocates call for resign-to-run law," May 16, 2010]</ref><ref>[http://www.hro.house.state.tx.us/pdf/focus/amend82.pdf Texas House Research Organization: "Focus Report for Amendments Proposed in November 8, 2011 Election", July 20, 2011]</ref>
+
Proponents of these requirements argue that officeholders should not divide their time in office between their duties and their own political advancement. In addition, proponents worry that, absent these laws, officeholders can unfairly leverage their present position against other candidates, while retaining that position as a fallback. Opponents, on the other hand, worry that the laws disproportionately effect those for whom public service is a full-time job. For these individuals, quitting their present position to campaign may not be a financially viable option.<ref>[http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/05/reform_advocates_call_for_resi.html ''PennLive.com,'' "Reform advocates call for resign-to-run law," May 16, 2010]</ref><ref>[http://www.hro.house.state.tx.us/pdf/focus/amend82.pdf Texas House Research Organization: "Focus Report for Amendments Proposed in November 8, 2011 Election", July 20, 2011]</ref>
  
 
==States==
 
==States==

Revision as of 17:27, 19 December 2011

SLP badge.png
Features of State Legislatures

Party dominance in state legislatures2012 Session TopicsStanding committees analysis for 2011-2012 sessionLength of terms of state representativesHow vacancies are filled in state legislaturesStates with a full-time legislatureState legislative chambers that use multi-member districtsState legislatures with term limitsComparison of state legislative salariesWhen state legislators assume office after a general electionPopulation represented by state legislatorsState constitutional articles governing state legislaturesState legislative sessionsResign-to-run laws
Resign-to-run laws require officeholders to resign from their current office in order to run for another. Nationwide, five states have resign-to-run laws--Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, and Texas.[1]

Proponents of these requirements argue that officeholders should not divide their time in office between their duties and their own political advancement. In addition, proponents worry that, absent these laws, officeholders can unfairly leverage their present position against other candidates, while retaining that position as a fallback. Opponents, on the other hand, worry that the laws disproportionately effect those for whom public service is a full-time job. For these individuals, quitting their present position to campaign may not be a financially viable option.[2][3]

States

Arizona

Title 38, Article 6, Section 296 of the Arizona Revised Statutes states:

A. Except during the final year of the term being served, no incumbent of a salaried elective office, whether holding by election or appointment, may offer himself for nomination or election to any salaried local, state or federal office.

Florida

Title IX, Chapter 99, Section 99.012 of the Florida Statues states:

(3)(a) No officer may qualify as a candidate for another state, district, county, or municipal public office if the terms or any part thereof run concurrently with each other without resigning from the office he or she presently holds. (b)The resignation is irrevocable...(7)Nothing contained in subsection (3) relates to persons holding any federal office or seeking the office of President or Vice President.

Georgia

Article II, Section II, Paragraph IV of the Georgia Constitution states:

The office of any state, county, or municipal elected official shall be declared vacant upon such elected official qualifying, in a general primary or general election, or special primary or special election, for another state, county, or municipal elective office or qualifying for the House of Representatives or the Senate of the United States if the term of the office for which such official is qualifying for begins more than 30 days prior to the expiration of such official's present term of office.

Hawaii

Article II, Section 7 of the Hawaii Constitution states:

Any elected public officer shall resign from that office before being eligible as a candidate for another public office, if the term of the office sought begins before the end of the term of the office held.

In Cobb v. State by Watanabe the Hawaii Supreme Court clarified Section 7:

The question raised by this original proceeding is whether article II, section 7 of the Hawaii State Constitution requires Plaintiff Steve Cobb to resign his State Senate seat in order to become a candidate for the United States House of Representatives...We cannot say with any certainty that the drafters of article II, section 7 intended for it to apply to candidates for federal offices. In view of the uncertainty, we conclude that Cobb should not have to resign from the State Senate in order to run for Congress.

Texas

Article 16, Section 65 of the Texas Constitution states:

(a) This section applies to the following offices: District Clerks; County Clerks; County Judges; Judges of the County Courts at Law, County Criminal Courts, County Probate Courts and County Domestic Relations Courts; County Treasurers; Criminal District Attorneys; County Surveyors; County Commissioners; Justices of the Peace; Sheriffs; Assessors and Collectors of Taxes; District Attorneys; County Attorneys; Public Weighers; and Constables.

(b) If any of the officers named herein shall announce their candidacy, or shall in fact become a candidate, in any General, Special or Primary Election, for any office of profit or trust under the laws of this State or the United States other than the office then held, at any time when the unexpired term of the office then held shall exceed one year and 30 days, such announcement or such candidacy shall constitute an automatic resignation of the office then held, and the vacancy thereby created shall be filled pursuant to law in the same manner as other vacancies for such office are filled.

*Note: In 2011, Texas voters approved Proposition 10 amending this section. The text above reflects these changes.

See also

References