Note: Ballotpedia will be read-only from 9pm CST on February 25-March 9 while Judgepedia is merged into Ballotpedia.
For status updates, visit lucyburns.org.
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.

Difference between revisions of "San Francisco Budget Procedures, Proposition A (November 2009)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Annotated dead link.)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}A '''San Francisco Budget Reform Charter Amendment, Proposition A''' ballot question was on the [[November 3, 2009 ballot measures in California|November 3, 2009 ballot]] in [[San Francisco City and County, California ballot measures|San Francisco]], where it was '''approved.'''<ref>[http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/under-the-dome/One-ballot-measure-goes-forth-another-fizzles-50649387.html ''San Francisco Examiner'', "One ballot lives, another fizzles", July 13, 2009]</ref>
+
{{tnr}}A '''San Francisco Budget Reform Charter Amendment, Proposition A''' ballot question was on the [[November 3, 2009 ballot measures in California|November 3, 2009 ballot]] in [[San Francisco City and County, California ballot measures|San Francisco]], where it was '''approved.'''<ref>[http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/under-the-dome/One-ballot-measure-goes-forth-another-fizzles-50649387.html ''San Francisco Examiner'', "One ballot lives, another fizzles," July 13, 2009]</ref>
  
 
Measure A:
 
Measure A:
Line 25: Line 25:
 
==Support==
 
==Support==
  
Proposition A was supported by a majority of San Francisco's supervisors and by [[Gavin Newsom]].  Newsom said that getting Proposition A passed was his  "No. 1 priority."<ref>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/26/BA3C1AATJ4.DTL#ixzz0V8phZ4Ts ''San Francisco Chronicle'', "S.F. ballot skips tax measures", October 27, 2009]</ref>
+
Proposition A was supported by a majority of San Francisco's supervisors and by [[Gavin Newsom]].  Newsom said that getting Proposition A passed was his  "No. 1 priority."<ref>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/26/BA3C1AATJ4.DTL#ixzz0V8phZ4Ts ''San Francisco Chronicle'', "S.F. ballot skips tax measures," October 27, 2009]</ref>
  
 
==Ballot question==
 
==Ballot question==
Line 36: Line 36:
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
{{submit a link}}
 
{{submit a link}}
* [http://www.sfgov.org/site/elections_index.asp?id=92589 Election results for Measure A]
+
* [http://www.sfgov.org/site/elections_index.asp?id=92589 Election results for Measure A] ''([[dead link]])''
* [http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/committees/materials/090622.pdf Text of proposed charter amendment]
+
* [http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/committees/materials/090622.pdf Text of proposed charter amendment] ''([[dead link]])''
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Latest revision as of 10:50, 8 October 2014

A San Francisco Budget Reform Charter Amendment, Proposition A ballot question was on the November 3, 2009 ballot in San Francisco, where it was approved.[1]

Measure A:

  • Instituted a two-year budgetary cycle
  • Required the adoption of a 5-year financial plan.
  • Adopted various financial policies
  • Set a deadline for the submission of MOUs for all labor unions.

Election results

Proposition A
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 68,270 69.89%
No29,41430.11%
These final, certified, results are from the San Francisco County elections office.

Support

Proposition A was supported by a majority of San Francisco's supervisors and by Gavin Newsom. Newsom said that getting Proposition A passed was his "No. 1 priority."[2]

Ballot question

The question on the ballot:

Proposition A: "Shall the City: establish a two-year budget cycle; be required to adopt a five-year financial plan; be required to adopt long-range financial policies and require that the budget comply with these policies; permit the Controller to certify the availability of funds for a contract if the Controller determines funds will be available when due; change deadlines for submitting and adopting labor agreements; and allow the Board to decide how to publish required public notices?"[3]

External links

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

References

  1. San Francisco Examiner, "One ballot lives, another fizzles," July 13, 2009
  2. San Francisco Chronicle, "S.F. ballot skips tax measures," October 27, 2009
  3. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.