PGI logo cropped.png
Congressional Millionaire’s Club
The Personal Gain Index shines a light on how members of Congress benefit during their tenure.





Difference between revisions of "San Francisco Budget Set-Asides and Replacement Funds, Proposition S (November 2008)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - "{{california}} Category:California 2008 local ballot measures" to "{{california counties}} Category:California 2008 local ballot measures")
 
(8 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TOCnestright}}
+
{{TOCnestright}}A '''San Francisco Budget Set-Asides and Identification of Replacement Funds, Proposition S''' ballot question was on the [[November 4, 2008 ballot measures in California#San Francisco|November 4, 2008 ballot]] in [[San Francisco City and County, California ballot measures#November 4|San Francisco]], where it was '''approved.'''
The '''San Francisco Policy Regarding Budget Set-Asides and Identification of Replacement Funds Act''', or '''Proposition S''', was on the [[California 2008 local ballot measures|November 4, 2008 ballot]] in [[San Francisco City and County, California ballot measures|San Francisco]] for voters in the City of San Francisco.
+
  
Proposition S was '''approved''' with 55.66% of the vote.
+
Proposition S made it a city policy that local ballot measures authorizing new set-asides or spending mandates must identify a new source of funding.
  
==Text of measure==
+
It also made it city policy that the voters cannot approve a new set-aside with a cost-of-living adjustment or other annual increase of more than 2%. Additionally, according to the terms of Proposition S, any new or extended set-aside proposed in a local ballot measure must automatically expire 10 years after it goes into effect.
  
The language on the ballot said:
+
==Election results==
:Shall it be City policy that the voters will not approve any new set-aside of City revenue unless the set-aside identifies a new funding source, includes limits on annual increases, and automatically expires after 10 years?
+
  
==External links==
+
{{Short outcome
 +
| title = Proposition S
 +
| yes = 167,974
 +
| yespct = 55.56
 +
| no = 133,817
 +
| nopct = 44.34
 +
| image =
 +
| unresolved =
 +
| state = Local
 +
| percent = 50.0
 +
}}
 +
:''These final, certified, results are from the [http://www.sfgov2.org/index.aspx?page=1793 San Francisco elections office].''
  
* [http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/elections/candidates/QualifiedLocalBallotMeasuresWithTitlesAsOf81508_3.pdf List of all measures on the November 4 San Francisco ballot]
+
==Ballot question==
* [http://www.sfgov.org/site/elections_page.asp?id=70720 Election results]
+
 
 +
{{Q box |
 +
  text = '''Proposition S:''' "Shall it be City policy that the voters will not approve any new set-aside of City revenue unless the set-aside identifies a new funding source, includes limits on annual increases, and automatically expires after 10 years?"
 +
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
==Path to the ballot==
 +
 
 +
Then-mayor [[Gavin Newsom]] requested that Proposition S appear on the ballot as a referred ordinance. San Francisco's election laws allow the mayor of the city to unilaterally place referred ordinances on the ballot.
 +
 
 +
==External links==
 +
{{submit a link}}
 +
* [http://sfpl4.sfpl.org/pdf/main/gic/elections/November4_2008.pdf November 4, 2008 official San Francisco voter guide]
 
* [http://www.sfusualsuspects.com/system/files/u14/Fall_Line_-_Maps_and_Analysis_from_Nov_2008.pdf David Latterman's analysis of the November 2008 San Francisco local ballot measures]
 
* [http://www.sfusualsuspects.com/system/files/u14/Fall_Line_-_Maps_and_Analysis_from_Nov_2008.pdf David Latterman's analysis of the November 2008 San Francisco local ballot measures]
  
 
{{california counties}}
 
{{california counties}}
[[Category:California 2008 local ballot measures]]
+
[[Category:City budget, California, 2008]]

Latest revision as of 09:46, 20 December 2012

A San Francisco Budget Set-Asides and Identification of Replacement Funds, Proposition S ballot question was on the November 4, 2008 ballot in San Francisco, where it was approved.

Proposition S made it a city policy that local ballot measures authorizing new set-asides or spending mandates must identify a new source of funding.

It also made it city policy that the voters cannot approve a new set-aside with a cost-of-living adjustment or other annual increase of more than 2%. Additionally, according to the terms of Proposition S, any new or extended set-aside proposed in a local ballot measure must automatically expire 10 years after it goes into effect.

Election results

Proposition S
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 167,974 55.56%
No133,81744.34%
These final, certified, results are from the San Francisco elections office.

Ballot question

The question on the ballot:

Proposition S: "Shall it be City policy that the voters will not approve any new set-aside of City revenue unless the set-aside identifies a new funding source, includes limits on annual increases, and automatically expires after 10 years?"[1]

Path to the ballot

Then-mayor Gavin Newsom requested that Proposition S appear on the ballot as a referred ordinance. San Francisco's election laws allow the mayor of the city to unilaterally place referred ordinances on the ballot.

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link


Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found