Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "San Francisco Candlestick Park Naming Rights, Proposition C (November 2009)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
One reason the issue is coming up now is because the 49ers are thinking about moving their team to Santa Clara.
 
One reason the issue is coming up now is because the 49ers are thinking about moving their team to Santa Clara.
 +
 +
==Vote considerations==
 +
 +
Political reporter Melissa Griffin suggested to her readers, "Vote for this if you want to send a gesture to the Niners that we will help them make money if they stay in San Francisco. Vote against this if you believe we should only sell the name of The ’Stick if it would fetch a lot more than the anticipated $700,000, or if you believe a different kind of gesture toward the Niners is in order."<ref>[http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/columns/melissa_griffin/Do-you-know-your-city-measures-67092072.html ''San Francisco Examiner'', "Do you know your city measures?", October 29, 2009]</ref>
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Revision as of 08:07, 29 October 2009

A San Francisco Candlestick Park Naming Rights Amendment, Proposition C ballot proposal will be on the November 3, 2009 ballot in San Francisco.[1]

Proposition C, if enacted, will repeal Proposition H, which was passed in 2004. Proposition H that required the 49ers football stadium to be named Candlestick Park. Proposition C will allow the sale of stadium naming rights could be sold. 50% of the proceeds received by the city by the sale of the naming rights would be used to fund directors at city recreation centers. Gavin Newsom supports Proposition C.[2]

San Francisco Supervisor Bevan Dufty also supports Proposition C.

One reason the issue is coming up now is because the 49ers are thinking about moving their team to Santa Clara.

Vote considerations

Political reporter Melissa Griffin suggested to her readers, "Vote for this if you want to send a gesture to the Niners that we will help them make money if they stay in San Francisco. Vote against this if you believe we should only sell the name of The ’Stick if it would fetch a lot more than the anticipated $700,000, or if you believe a different kind of gesture toward the Niners is in order."[3]

See also

External links

References

  1. KCBS, "Candlestick Naming Rights Headed Back to Ballot", July 16, 2009
  2. San Francisco Chronicle, "S.F. ballot skips tax measures", October 27, 2009
  3. San Francisco Examiner, "Do you know your city measures?", October 29, 2009