PGI logo cropped.png
Congressional Millionaire’s Club
The Personal Gain Index shines a light on how members of Congress benefit during their tenure.





Difference between revisions of "San Francisco Clean Energy Act, Proposition H (November 2008)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''San Francisco Clean Energy Act''', or '''Proposition H''', will appear on the [[California 2008 local ballot measures|November 4, 2008 ballot]] in [[San Francisco County, California ballot measures|San Francisco]].<ref>[http://cbs5.com/local/sf.energy.ballot.2.777817.html ''SF Supervisors Approve Clean Energy Ballot Measure'', July 23, 2008]</ref>
+
The '''San Francisco Clean Energy Act''', or '''Proposition H''', appeared on the [[California 2008 local ballot measures|November 4, 2008 ballot]] in [[San Francisco County, California ballot measures|San Francisco]].<ref>[http://cbs5.com/local/sf.energy.ballot.2.777817.html ''SF Supervisors Approve Clean Energy Ballot Measure'', July 23, 2008]</ref>
  
The measure calls on the city to:
+
'''Measure H was defeated with 38.44% of the vote.'''
 +
 
 +
The measure called on the city to:
  
 
* Produce more than half of its energy through renewable sources within a decade. However, it defines "renewable sources" as simply non-nuclear, as opposed to the State of California's more stringent definition.
 
* Produce more than half of its energy through renewable sources within a decade. However, it defines "renewable sources" as simply non-nuclear, as opposed to the State of California's more stringent definition.

Revision as of 20:26, 19 November 2008

The San Francisco Clean Energy Act, or Proposition H, appeared on the November 4, 2008 ballot in San Francisco.[1]

Measure H was defeated with 38.44% of the vote.

The measure called on the city to:

  • Produce more than half of its energy through renewable sources within a decade. However, it defines "renewable sources" as simply non-nuclear, as opposed to the State of California's more stringent definition.
  • Explore a move toward city control of its power. There is no mandate to stop a takeover of private utilities by the board, however, if the study does not result in a recommendation for a public power takeover.
  • Fulfill 51 percent of its energy needs through renewable energy by 2017, rising to 75 percent by 2030, and 100 percent "or the greatest amount technologically feasible or practicable" by 2040.

Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, the original sponsor of the charter amendment, said it represents "what San Francisco's green energy should strive for." Mirkarimi said it was "not a hostile takeover" of private power companies, but represented "what should be the indigenous right of San Franciscans." The primary motivation behind the measure is the belief that Pacific Gas & Electric doesn't buy enough renewable-sourced energy to provide electricity in the city.

  • 11.4% of PG&E's electricity came from renewable sources in 2007.
  • Under current law, the amount of energy PG&E buys from renewable sources must increase to 20% by 2010.
  • Proposition H would require the city to get 51 percent of electricity from renewables by 2017.
  • Proposition H would require the city to get 75 percent of electricity from renewables by 2030.[2]

Opponents

Dianne Feinstein opposes Proposition H. So does Mayor Gavin Newsome.

External links

References

  1. SF Supervisors Approve Clean Energy Ballot Measure, July 23, 2008
  2. New York Times, "A Clean Energy Uprising in San Francisco"