Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




San Francisco Confirmation Required of Mayoral Appointments to the Public Utilities Commission, Proposition E (June 2008)

From Ballotpedia
Revision as of 06:36, 7 January 2013 by Polycal (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
A San Francisco Confirmation Required of Mayoral Appointments to the Public Utilities Commission, Measure E ballot question was on the June 3, 2008 ballot in San Francisco, California, where it was approved.[1]

Proposition E requires confirmation by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors of the mayor's appointments to the Public Utilities Commission. Proposition E also changed the process for appointing board members by requiring a majority of the supervisors to vote in favor of an appointment; whereas, under the previous law, supervisors were not required to approve an appointment but they could reject an appointee if they so chose by a two-thirds vote.

Proposition E also requires that each seat is held by someone with particular experience or expertise in areas including environmental policy, consumer advocacy, project finance and power, or public utility management.

Proposition E was placed on the ballot after a protracted battle between the Board of Supervisors and Mayor Gavin Newsom. The fight was over two of the mayor's appointments to the five-member San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, which oversees the city's water and power system as well as its sewer and water treatment operations.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, "The supervisors held up one appointment and rejected another, largely because of Newsom's controversial decision to fire PUC General Manager Susan Leal. Some supervisors also consider Newsom, and by extension, the commission, unfriendly toward public power initiatives that would allow the agency to develop sources of energy and deliver electricity. With this ballot measure, some supervisors are seeking to flex their muscle in guiding PUC appointments, and presumably policy."

Election results

Proposition E
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 80,489 51.79%
No74,91648.21%
These final, certified, election results are from the San Francisco elections office.

Opposition

Proposition E was opposed by Newsom, Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier and the Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods.

Ballot question

The question on the ballot:

This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

Proposition E: "Shall the City set qualifications for members of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and change the process for appointing members to the PUC by requiring a majority of the Board of Supervisors to approve the Mayor's appointments to the PUC?"

See also

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

References