Difference between revisions of "San Francisco Criminals Forfeit Retirement, Proposition C (June 2008)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - ""," to ","")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}A '''San Francisco Forfeiture of Retirement Benefits for Conviction of a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude in Connection with City Employment, Measure C''' ballot question was on the [[June 3, 2008 ballot measures in California|June 3, 2008 ballot]] in [[San Francisco City and County, California ballot measures|San Francisco]], [[California]], where it was '''approved'''.  
+
{{tnr}}A '''San Francisco Forfeiture of Retirement Benefits for Conviction of a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude in Connection with City Employment, Measure C''' ballot question was on the [[June 3, 2008 ballot measures in California|June 3, 2008 ballot]] in [[San Francisco City and County, California ballot measures#June 3|San Francisco]], [[California]], where it was '''approved'''.<ref>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/05/16/BAHM10LRJG.DTL&type=politics ''San Francisco Chronicle'', "S.F. voters face ballot measures," May 17, 2008]</ref>
  
It amends the city and county charters so that city and county employees convicted of certain crimes including those involving moral turpitude shall forfeit the retirement benefits to which they would otherwise be entitled.  The measure was placed on the ballot by a vote of the county supervisors.
+
Proposition C amended the San Francisco charter so that city and county employees convicted of certain crimes including those involving moral turpitude shall forfeit the retirement benefits to which they would otherwise be entitled.  The measure was placed on the ballot by a vote of the county supervisors.
  
San Francisco has barred employees convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude -- such as theft, fraud or the breach of public trust - from collecting employer-funded retirement benefits since 1966.  A recent court decision regarding the 1966 law determined that morally turpitudinous employees could still collect disability claims and "vesting allowances." Measure C is intended to close that loophole by making it explicit that these benefits are not available to criminal convicts.
+
San Francisco has barred employees convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude -- such as theft, fraud or the breach of public trust - from collecting employer-funded retirement benefits since 1966.  A recent court decision regarding the 1966 law determined that morally turpitudinous employees could still collect disability claims and "vesting allowances." Proposition C was intended to close that loophole by making it explicit that these benefits are not available to criminal convicts.
  
Supervisor Chris Daly and the Harvey Milk LGBT Democratic Club were opposed to Measure C on the grounds that the phrase, "moral turpitude" has been used by courts to discriminate against gay people. Some opponents also say the measure could vilify hard-working public employees.
+
==Election results==
  
Supervisor Bevan Dufty, who is gay and a supporter of C, was dismissive of the idea that the retirement benefits of gay people might be in any way imperilled by Measure C, saying that the measure applies to criminals, not gay people. "From a legal standpoint, I don't think it means anything more than people who violate city laws are going to have repercussions."
+
{{Short outcome
 +
| title = Proposition C
 +
| yes = 91,924
 +
| yespct = 58.07
 +
| no = 66,379
 +
| nopct = 41.93
 +
| image =
 +
| unresolved =
 +
| state = Local
 +
| percent = 50.0
 +
}}
 +
:''These final, certified, election results are from the [http://www.sfgov2.org/index.aspx?page=1787 San Francisco elections office].''
 +
 
 +
==Support==
 +
 
 +
Supervisor Bevan Dufty, who is gay and was a supporter of Proposition C, was dismissive of the idea that the retirement benefits of gay people might be in any way imperiled by Proposition C, saying that the measure applies to criminals, not gay people. "From a legal standpoint, I don't think it means anything more than people who violate city laws are going to have repercussions."
 +
 
 +
==Opposition==
 +
 
 +
Supervisor Chris Daly and the Harvey Milk LGBT Democratic Club were opposed to Proposition C on the grounds that the phrase "moral turpitude" has been used by courts to discriminate against gay people. Some opponents also said the measure could vilify hard-working public employees.
  
 
==Ballot question==
 
==Ballot question==
Line 21: Line 40:
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 +
{{submit a link}}
 +
* [http://sfpl4.sfpl.org/pdf/main/gic/elections/June3_2008.pdf Official voter pamphlet for Proposition C]
  
* [http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/elections/candidates/Jun2008_LT_ForfeitureRetirementConviction.pdf Text of measure] PDF.
+
==References==
* [http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/05/16/BAHM10LRJG.DTL&type=politics S.F. voters face ballot measures], San Francisco Chronicle, May 17, 2008
+
{{reflist}}
  
 
{{california counties}}
 
{{california counties}}

Latest revision as of 08:10, 21 March 2014

A San Francisco Forfeiture of Retirement Benefits for Conviction of a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude in Connection with City Employment, Measure C ballot question was on the June 3, 2008 ballot in San Francisco, California, where it was approved.[1]

Proposition C amended the San Francisco charter so that city and county employees convicted of certain crimes including those involving moral turpitude shall forfeit the retirement benefits to which they would otherwise be entitled. The measure was placed on the ballot by a vote of the county supervisors.

San Francisco has barred employees convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude -- such as theft, fraud or the breach of public trust - from collecting employer-funded retirement benefits since 1966. A recent court decision regarding the 1966 law determined that morally turpitudinous employees could still collect disability claims and "vesting allowances." Proposition C was intended to close that loophole by making it explicit that these benefits are not available to criminal convicts.

Election results

Proposition C
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 91,924 58.07%
No66,37941.93%
These final, certified, election results are from the San Francisco elections office.

Support

Supervisor Bevan Dufty, who is gay and was a supporter of Proposition C, was dismissive of the idea that the retirement benefits of gay people might be in any way imperiled by Proposition C, saying that the measure applies to criminals, not gay people. "From a legal standpoint, I don't think it means anything more than people who violate city laws are going to have repercussions."

Opposition

Supervisor Chris Daly and the Harvey Milk LGBT Democratic Club were opposed to Proposition C on the grounds that the phrase "moral turpitude" has been used by courts to discriminate against gay people. Some opponents also said the measure could vilify hard-working public employees.

Ballot question

The question on the ballot:

Proposition C: "Shall the City prohibit San Francisco Employees' Retirement System members who are convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude in connection with their employment from receiving any retirement benefits funded with employer contributions?"[2]

See also

External links

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

References

  1. San Francisco Chronicle, "S.F. voters face ballot measures," May 17, 2008
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.