Difference between revisions of "San Francisco Earthquake Safety Bond, Proposition B (June 2010)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}A '''San Francisco Earthquake Safety Bond, Proposition B''' ballot measure was on the {{jun08ca2010}} in {{San Francisco}}, where it was '''approved.'''<ref>[http://www.beyondchron.org/articles/June_Ballot_Measures_Reflect_City_s_Political_Fault_Lines_7943.html ''Beyond Chron'', "June Ballot Measures Reflect City’s Political Fault Lines", March 24, 2010]</ref>
+
{{tnr}}A '''San Francisco Earthquake Safety Bond, Proposition B''' ballot question was on the {{jun08ca2010}} in {{San Francisco}}, where it was '''approved.'''<ref>[http://www.beyondchron.org/articles/June_Ballot_Measures_Reflect_City_s_Political_Fault_Lines_7943.html ''Beyond Chron'', "June Ballot Measures Reflect City’s Political Fault Lines", March 24, 2010]</ref>
  
* Yes: 82409 (79.17%) {{approved}}
+
Proposition B authorized the city to sell a $412 million bond to retrofit some buildings for earthquake safety reasons.  Buildings targeted for earthquake safety upgrades include neighborhood police stations, fire stations and the Hall of Justice.  
* No: 21685 (20.83%)
+
 
+
Proposition B authorizes the city to sell a $412 million bond to retrofit some buildings for earthquake safety reasons.  Buildings targeted for earthquake safety upgrades include neighborhood police stations, fire stations and the Hall of Justice.  
+
  
 
A {{2/3}} was required for approval. (In [[California]], a {{55%}} is required to approve [[school bond elections in California|school bond measures]], but a {{2/3}} is required to approve city bonds.)
 
A {{2/3}} was required for approval. (In [[California]], a {{55%}} is required to approve [[school bond elections in California|school bond measures]], but a {{2/3}} is required to approve city bonds.)
 +
 +
==Election results==
 +
{{Short outcome
 +
| title = Proposition B
 +
| yes = 117553
 +
| yespct = 79.41
 +
| no = 30484
 +
| nopct = 20.59
 +
| image =
 +
| unresolved =
 +
| state = Local
 +
| percent = 66.67
 +
}}
 +
: These final, certified results are from the [http://sfelections.org/results/20100608/summary.php San Francisco County elections office].
  
 
==Supporters==
 
==Supporters==
Line 31: Line 42:
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
  
{{california stub}}
+
{{California counties}}
 
+
 
[[Category:City bonds, California, 2010]]
 
[[Category:City bonds, California, 2010]]

Revision as of 23:36, 12 June 2013

A San Francisco Earthquake Safety Bond, Proposition B ballot question was on the June 8, 2010 ballot in San Francisco, where it was approved.[1]

Proposition B authorized the city to sell a $412 million bond to retrofit some buildings for earthquake safety reasons. Buildings targeted for earthquake safety upgrades include neighborhood police stations, fire stations and the Hall of Justice.

A 2/3rds supermajority vote was required for approval. (In California, a 55% supermajority vote is required to approve school bond measures, but a 2/3rds supermajority vote is required to approve city bonds.)

Election results

Proposition B
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 117553 79.41%
No3048420.59%
These final, certified results are from the San Francisco County elections office.

Supporters

Supporters of Proposition B included San Francisco's Democratic and Republican parties, the Labor Council, the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, Mayor Gavin Newsom and the San Francisco Board of Supervisors President David Chiu.

The San Francisco Chronicle's editorial board endorsed a "yes" vote on Proposition B: "Two words should be sufficient to explain the need for this measure: 'Haiti' and 'Chile.' A disaster in San Francisco - most likely an earthquake - could destroy the infrastructure needed by basic emergency services."[2]

Opponents

Opponents of Proposition B included San Francisco County Supervisor Chris Daly. His objection to the measure was that it doesn't go far enough, because it doesn't include the jail at 850 Bryant.

Stripped down

San Francisco's Board of Supervisors originally considered a $652 million bond. That would have allowed the city to build a new forensic sciences center to house crime labs and the medical examiner's office. However, after due consideration, the supervisors decided to remove that $240 million project from the proposal.[3]

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

References