Difference between revisions of "San Francisco Hetch Hetchy Reservoir Initiative, Proposition F (November 2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Support)
(Path to the ballot)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
==Path to the ballot==
 
==Path to the ballot==
  
The measure earned its spot on the ballot through the collection of signatures on initiative petitions.<ref name=sigs>[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/11/hetch-hetchy-ballot-measure_n_1665596.html?ir=San+Francisco ''Huffington Post'', "Hetch Hetchy Ballot Measure: Environmental Group Seeks To Tear Down SF's Primary Source Of Drinking Water", July 11, 2012]</ref>
+
The measure earned its spot on the ballot through the collection of signatures on initiative petitions. 9,702 valid signatures were required for qualification purposes, and approximately 16,000 signatures were submitted.<ref name=sigs>[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/11/hetch-hetchy-ballot-measure_n_1665596.html?ir=San+Francisco ''Huffington Post'', "Hetch Hetchy Ballot Measure: Environmental Group Seeks To Tear Down SF's Primary Source Of Drinking Water", July 11, 2012]</ref>
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==

Revision as of 09:15, 9 August 2012

A San Francisco "Water Sustainability and Environmental Restoration Act" ballot question is on the November 6, 2012 ballot for voters in San Francisco.

What the measure will do if it is approved is a subject that supporters and opponents do not agree on. Supporters say it will "restore" the Hetch Hetchy Valley. Opponents say it will "drain Hetch Hetchy."[1]

The city's Ballot Simplification Committee held a hearing in early August to deliberate about how to describe the measure in its official ballot text. The language they chose uses the phrase "drain Hetch Hetchy" four times. Supporters of the measure plan to file a lawsuit to stop the city from using that language in the official ballot text. They say, "We believe these changes create a political bias against the measure, do not accurately reflect the language of the initiative, and mislead voters."[1]

However, some aspects of what the measure would do are not in dispute. These include:

  • It would require the city to spend up to $8 million on a study about whether to shut down the reservoir.[1]

Support

A group called "Restore Hetch Hetchy" supports the measure. Mike Marshall is the director of Restore Hetch Hetchy. He also leads the campaign to pass the measure. Marshall says, "The Hetch Hetchy Valley in Yosemite National Park is an American gem. It is one of the most extraordinary ecosystems in the world. Yosemite is one of the crown jewels of our park system, and it deserves to be whole."[2]

Opposition

  • Mayor Ed Lee says that the measure is "stupid" and "insane".[1]
  • According to the San Francisco Examiner, "there is a united front of elected city officials opposing the measure."[1]
  • A group called "Save Hetch Hetchy" opposes the measure.[1]

Path to the ballot

The measure earned its spot on the ballot through the collection of signatures on initiative petitions. 9,702 valid signatures were required for qualification purposes, and approximately 16,000 signatures were submitted.[2]

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

References


Flag of California.png

This article about a local California ballot measure is a stub. You can help people learn about California's local ballot measures by expanding it.