Difference between revisions of "San Francisco Hotel Tax Clarifications and Definitions, Measure K (November 2010)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - '==Ballot question==' to '==Text of measure==')
m (Text replace - '<references/>' to '{{reflist}}')
Line 40: Line 40:
{{Taxes in California}}
{{Taxes in California}}

Revision as of 07:58, 9 June 2011

A San Francisco Hotel Tax Clarifications and Definitions, Measure K ballot proposition was on the November 2, 2010 ballot for voters in San Francisco. It was defeated.

Measure J, on the same ballot, was a competing measure. It, too, was defeated.

Competing propositions J and K both would have altered the way that hotel customers who book their hotel rooms online are charged a hotel tax. Currently, hotel taxes are assessed so that when a customer books a hotel room through an online booking service such as Expedia or Orbitz, the hotel tax is only assessed on the amount that a hotel receives, not on the amount that the website charges the customer. If a website sells a room to an online customer for $150 a night, but only $120 of that goes to the hotel, the customer under current law is only charged a hotel tax on the lower amount. If Measure J passes, the customer will have to pay a hotel tax on the full amount paid to the online booking service, not the lower amount that the hotel actually receives for its room. This change is expected to generate $6 million a year.[1]

However, Measure K only makes that change, and in a slightly different way than Measure J makes it, while Measure J also would have increased the overall hotel tax rate from 14% to 16%, while Measure K would not have increased the hotel tax rate.[1]

Election results

  • Yes: 95,357 (38.53%)
  • No: 152,159 (61.47%) Defeatedd

Election results are from the San Francisco elections division as of November 26, 2010.

Residency exemption

Under existing hotel tax laws in San Francisco, there is something called a "permanent resident" exemption to the city's hotel tax. This exemption was intended to protect low-income people who live in what are sometimes described as "residency hotels", such as YMCAs and YWCAs, from having to pay the city's hotel tax.

However, several airlines have said that their employees who frequently stay in San Francisco hotels should also be defined as falling under the "permanent resident" exemption. Litigation has occurred between airlines and the city on this point that has dragged on for a number of years, resulting in expensive legal bills for both the airlines and the city.

Measure K was drafted to conclusively end the dispute in favor of the idea that airlines should not be exempt. It does this by saying that only "natural persons" can be held to be exempt; corporations ("artificial persons") can never be considered exempt.

Text of measure

The question on the ballot:

Proposition K: Shall the City keep the hotel tax rate at 14%, confirm that anyone collecting rent from a hotel guest must also collect tax on room rental and related charges, and define “permanent resident” so that only an individual could qualify for the “permanent resident” exemption?[2]

See also

External links


  1. 1.0 1.1 San Francisco Examiner, "Battle of hotel measures", September 16, 2010
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

Flag of California.png

This California-related article is a stub. You can help people learn about California politics by expanding it.