Difference between revisions of "San Francisco No Advertising on City Property, Proposition E (November 2009)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''San Francisco No Advertising on City Property, Measure E ballot proposition''' will be on the {{nov03ca2009}} in {{san francisco}}.
+
A '''San Francisco No Advertising on City Property, Measure E ballot proposition''' was on the {{nov03ca2009}} in {{san francisco}}, where it was '''approved.'''
  
Measure E will prohibit new commercial advertisers on city property.<ref>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/26/BA3C1AATJ4.DTL ''San Francisco Chronicle'', "S.F. ballot skips tax measures", October 27, 2009]</ref>
+
* Yes: 51,350 (57.41%) {{approved}}
 +
* No: 38,089 (42.59%)
 +
 
 +
Measure E prohibits new commercial advertisers on city property.<ref>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/26/BA3C1AATJ4.DTL ''San Francisco Chronicle'', "S.F. ballot skips tax measures", October 27, 2009]</ref>
  
 
Political reporter Melissa Griffin suggested to her readers, "Vote for this if you don’t want public buildings and street furniture to be so covered in ads that they resemble NASCAR vehicles. Vote against this if you figure no unsentimental city property should be off limits as a moneymaker."<ref>[http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/columns/melissa_griffin/Do-you-know-your-city-measures-67092072.html ''San Francisco Examiner'', "Do you know your city measures?", October 29, 2009]</ref>
 
Political reporter Melissa Griffin suggested to her readers, "Vote for this if you don’t want public buildings and street furniture to be so covered in ads that they resemble NASCAR vehicles. Vote against this if you figure no unsentimental city property should be off limits as a moneymaker."<ref>[http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/columns/melissa_griffin/Do-you-know-your-city-measures-67092072.html ''San Francisco Examiner'', "Do you know your city measures?", October 29, 2009]</ref>
Line 7: Line 10:
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
  
 +
* [http://www.sfgov.org/site/elections_index.asp?id=92589 Election results for Measure E]
 
* [http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/elections/ElectionsArchives/Meeting_Information/BSC/agendas/2009/PropE.pdf Text of Measure E]
 
* [http://www.sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/elections/ElectionsArchives/Meeting_Information/BSC/agendas/2009/PropE.pdf Text of Measure E]
 
* [http://sfbeautiful.org/billboards/ SF Beautiful, supporters of Measure C]
 
* [http://sfbeautiful.org/billboards/ SF Beautiful, supporters of Measure C]

Revision as of 07:33, 8 November 2009

A San Francisco No Advertising on City Property, Measure E ballot proposition was on the November 3, 2009 ballot in San Francisco, where it was approved.

  • Yes: 51,350 (57.41%) Approveda
  • No: 38,089 (42.59%)

Measure E prohibits new commercial advertisers on city property.[1]

Political reporter Melissa Griffin suggested to her readers, "Vote for this if you don’t want public buildings and street furniture to be so covered in ads that they resemble NASCAR vehicles. Vote against this if you figure no unsentimental city property should be off limits as a moneymaker."[2]

External links

References

  1. San Francisco Chronicle, "S.F. ballot skips tax measures", October 27, 2009
  2. San Francisco Examiner, "Do you know your city measures?", October 29, 2009

Flag of California.png

This California-related article is a stub. You can help people learn about California politics by expanding it.