Difference between revisions of "San Francisco Real Property Transfer Tax, Proposition N (November 2010)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - 'is on the {{nov02ca2010}}' to 'was on the {{nov02ca2010}}')
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}A '''San Francisco Real Property Transfer Tax, Proposition N''' was on the {{nov02ca2010}} for voters in {{san francisco}}.
+
{{tnr}}A '''San Francisco Real Property Transfer Tax, Proposition N''' was on the {{nov02ca2010}} for voters in {{san francisco}}. It was '''approved.'''
  
Proposition N, if approved, will increase the tax rate for the sale of real estate valued at more than $5 million:
+
Proposition N increases the tax rate for the sale of real estate valued at more than $5 million:
  
* For real estate sales of $5 million to $10 million, the rate would increase from 1.5% to 2.0%.  
+
* For real estate sales of $5 million to $10 million, the rate will increase from 1.5% to 2.0%.  
* For real estate sales of $10 million or more, the rate would increase from 1.5% to 2.5%.  
+
* For real estate sales of $10 million or more, the rate will increase from 1.5% to 2.5%.  
* These increases would also apply to real estate leases with a term of 35 years or more.
+
* These increases also apply to real estate leases with a term of 35 years or more.
 +
 
 +
==Election results==
 +
 
 +
* Yes: 149,350 (58.49%) {{approved}}
 +
* No: 105,979 (41.51%)
 +
 
 +
Election results are from the [http://www.sfelections.org/results/20101102/ San Francisco elections division] as of November 26, 2010.
  
 
==Support==
 
==Support==
  
The official ballot argument in favor of Proposition N is signed by:
+
The official ballot argument in favor of Proposition N was signed by:
  
 
* Supervisor John Avalos
 
* Supervisor John Avalos
Line 16: Line 23:
 
* Sierra Club
 
* Sierra Club
  
They say:
+
They said:
  
 
:"San Franciscans voted overwhelmingly in November, 2008 for a progressive real estate transfer tax structure. Proposition N continues this important work of tax reform. Proposition N will help fund vital city services when the largest downtown office buildings are bought and sold. It will NOT impact homeowners or small property owners."
 
:"San Franciscans voted overwhelmingly in November, 2008 for a progressive real estate transfer tax structure. Proposition N continues this important work of tax reform. Proposition N will help fund vital city services when the largest downtown office buildings are bought and sold. It will NOT impact homeowners or small property owners."
Line 22: Line 29:
 
==Opposition==
 
==Opposition==
  
The official ballot argument in opposition to Proposition N is signed by:
+
The official ballot argument in opposition to Proposition N was signed by:
  
 
* Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier
 
* Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier
 
* Supervisor Sean Elsbernd
 
* Supervisor Sean Elsbernd
  
They say:
+
They said:
  
 
:"Proposition N is unwise and unnecessary. By raising taxes on the sale of commercial and residential properties, Proposition N will lead to higher rents for residential units and commercial businesses. Now is the wrong time to pursue a policy that will create additional barriers to doing business in San Francisco. Stand with small businesses and hard-working San Franciscans and reject this job-killing tax increase."
 
:"Proposition N is unwise and unnecessary. By raising taxes on the sale of commercial and residential properties, Proposition N will lead to higher rents for residential units and commercial businesses. Now is the wrong time to pursue a policy that will create additional barriers to doing business in San Francisco. Stand with small businesses and hard-working San Franciscans and reject this job-killing tax increase."

Revision as of 07:00, 26 November 2010

A San Francisco Real Property Transfer Tax, Proposition N was on the November 2, 2010 ballot for voters in San Francisco. It was approved.

Proposition N increases the tax rate for the sale of real estate valued at more than $5 million:

  • For real estate sales of $5 million to $10 million, the rate will increase from 1.5% to 2.0%.
  • For real estate sales of $10 million or more, the rate will increase from 1.5% to 2.5%.
  • These increases also apply to real estate leases with a term of 35 years or more.

Election results

  • Yes: 149,350 (58.49%) Approveda
  • No: 105,979 (41.51%)

Election results are from the San Francisco elections division as of November 26, 2010.

Support

The official ballot argument in favor of Proposition N was signed by:

  • Supervisor John Avalos
  • Chinese Progressive Association
  • United Educators of San Francisco
  • Sierra Club

They said:

"San Franciscans voted overwhelmingly in November, 2008 for a progressive real estate transfer tax structure. Proposition N continues this important work of tax reform. Proposition N will help fund vital city services when the largest downtown office buildings are bought and sold. It will NOT impact homeowners or small property owners."

Opposition

The official ballot argument in opposition to Proposition N was signed by:

  • Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier
  • Supervisor Sean Elsbernd

They said:

"Proposition N is unwise and unnecessary. By raising taxes on the sale of commercial and residential properties, Proposition N will lead to higher rents for residential units and commercial businesses. Now is the wrong time to pursue a policy that will create additional barriers to doing business in San Francisco. Stand with small businesses and hard-working San Franciscans and reject this job-killing tax increase."

Ballot question

The question on the ballot:

Proposition N: Shall the City increase its real property transfer tax rate to 2.0% for sales and long-term leases of real property valued at $5 million to $10 million and to 2.5% for sales and long-term leases of real property valued at $10 million or more?[1]

Path to the ballot

On July 27, 2010, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted 8-3 to put Proposition N on the ballot.

  • Supervisors Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Daly, Dufty, Mar, Maxwell and Mirkarimi voted in favor of putting Proposition N on the ballot.
  • Supervisors Alioto-Pier, Chu and Elsbernd voted against.

See also

External links


Flag of California.png

This California-related article is a stub. You can help people learn about California politics by expanding it.


Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found