Difference between revisions of "San Francisco Transbay Terminal Advisory Vote, Proposition G (June 2010)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - '[[category' to '[[Category')
m (Text replace - ""," to ","")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Transbay Terminal.jpg|thumb|200px|2008 image of the Transbay Terminal]]{{tnr}}A '''San Francisco Transbay Terminal Advisory Vote, Proposition G''' was on the {{jun08ca2010}} in {{San Francisco}}, where it was '''overwhelmingly approved.'''<ref name=beyond>[http://www.beyondchron.org/articles/June_Ballot_Measures_Reflect_City_s_Political_Fault_Lines_7943.html ''Beyond Chron'', "June Ballot Measures Reflect City’s Political Fault Lines", March 24, 2010]</ref>
+
[[File:Transbay Terminal.jpg|thumb|200px|2008 image of the Transbay Terminal]]{{tnr}}A '''San Francisco Transbay Terminal Advisory Vote, Proposition G''' was on the {{jun08ca2010}} in {{San Francisco}}, where it was '''overwhelmingly approved.'''<ref name=beyond>[http://www.beyondchron.org/articles/June_Ballot_Measures_Reflect_City_s_Political_Fault_Lines_7943.html ''Beyond Chron'', "June Ballot Measures Reflect City’s Political Fault Lines," March 24, 2010]</ref>
 
+
* Yes: 84,878 (83.51%) {{approved}}
+
* No: 16,763 (16.49%)
+
  
 
Proposition G asked voters what they thought about the idea of making the Transbay Terminal the northern terminus of California’s High Speed Rail.  
 
Proposition G asked voters what they thought about the idea of making the Transbay Terminal the northern terminus of California’s High Speed Rail.  
Line 16: Line 13:
 
According to a San Franciscan political pundit, the gist of Proposition G was to send a message to Kopp: "Dear Quentin Kopp, the San Francisco stop on the high-speed rail line is going to be that Transbay Terminal spot on Mission and First streets that we’ve had our heart set on for years. Seriously, stop mucking this up."<ref name=rail/>
 
According to a San Franciscan political pundit, the gist of Proposition G was to send a message to Kopp: "Dear Quentin Kopp, the San Francisco stop on the high-speed rail line is going to be that Transbay Terminal spot on Mission and First streets that we’ve had our heart set on for years. Seriously, stop mucking this up."<ref name=rail/>
  
 +
==Election results==
 +
{{Short outcome
 +
| title = Proposition G
 +
| yes = 120,788
 +
| yespct = 83.76
 +
| no = 23,421
 +
| nopct = 16.24
 +
| image =
 +
| unresolved =
 +
| state = Local
 +
| percent = 50.0
 +
}}
 +
: These final, certified results are from the [http://sfelections.org/results/20100608/summary.php San Francisco County elections office].
 +
 +
==Supporters==
 +
 +
The [[San Francisco Chronicle]]'s editorial board urged a "yes" vote on Proposition G: "Underscoring [the decision of high-speed rail authorities to use the Transbay Terminal for the northern terminus of the high-speed rail line] with a strong public endorsement should clear up any mystery about where the train line should run.<Ref name=sfc>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/05/15/EDDH1DD0RA.DTL&type=politics ''San Francisco Chronicle'', "San Francisco's ballot measures," May 16, 2010]</ref>
 +
 +
==Text of measure==
 +
{{Q box |
 +
text = Shall it be City policy that the northern end of the planned San Francisco-to-Los Angeles high-speed rail line be located at the Transbay Transit Center at First and Mission streets?<ref>[http://sfelections.org/results/20100608/summary.php San Francisco County elections office archive]</ref>}}
 
==Background==
 
==Background==
  
 
* In 1999, San Francisco voters by a margin of 70% voted to make it a city policy to extend the Caltrain station from Fourth and King streets up to the Transbay Terminal location on Mission and First streets.  
 
* In 1999, San Francisco voters by a margin of 70% voted to make it a city policy to extend the Caltrain station from Fourth and King streets up to the Transbay Terminal location on Mission and First streets.  
 
* In 2003, voters approved a 1/2 cent sales tax that would be in effect for 30 years to pay for transportation improvements, including moving Caltrain to the Transbay Terminal.
 
* In 2003, voters approved a 1/2 cent sales tax that would be in effect for 30 years to pay for transportation improvements, including moving Caltrain to the Transbay Terminal.
* In 2008, 80% of San Francisco voters were in favor of the statewide proposition, [[California Proposition 1A (2008)|Proposition 1A]], which called for the sale of bonds to fund "the construction of a high-speed train system that connects the San Francisco Transbay Terminal to Los Angeles Union Station."<ref name=rail>[http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/columns/melissa_griffin/City-fights-for-Transbay-Terminal-91782494.html ''San Francisco Examiner'', "City Fights for Transbay Terminal", April 22, 2010]</ref>
+
* In 2008, 80% of San Francisco voters were in favor of the statewide proposition, [[California Proposition 1A (2008)|Proposition 1A]], which called for the sale of bonds to fund "the construction of a high-speed train system that connects the San Francisco Transbay Terminal to Los Angeles Union Station."<ref name=rail>[http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/columns/melissa_griffin/City-fights-for-Transbay-Terminal-91782494.html ''San Francisco Examiner'', "City Fights for Transbay Terminal," April 22, 2010]</ref>
 
+
==Supporters==
+
 
+
The [[San Francisco Chronicle]]'s editorial board urged a "yes" vote on Proposition G: "Underscoring [the decision of high-speed rail authorities to use the Transbay Terminal for the northern terminus of the high-speed rail line] with a strong public endorsement should clear up any mystery about where the train line should run.<Ref name=sfc>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/05/15/EDDH1DD0RA.DTL&type=politics ''San Francisco Chronicle'', "San Francisco's ballot measures", May 16, 2010]</ref>
+
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 +
{{submit a link}}
 
{{wikipedia|San Francisco Transbay Terminal|Transbay Terminal}}
 
{{wikipedia|San Francisco Transbay Terminal|Transbay Terminal}}
 
* [http://www.sfgov2.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/elections/ElectionsArchives/Meeting_Information/BSC/agendas/2010/Legal%20text-TransbayTransitCenter.pdf Legal text of Proposition G]
 
* [http://www.sfgov2.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/elections/ElectionsArchives/Meeting_Information/BSC/agendas/2010/Legal%20text-TransbayTransitCenter.pdf Legal text of Proposition G]
Line 36: Line 51:
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
  
{{california stub}}
+
{{California counties}}
  
[[Category:Advisory vote, California, 2010]]
+
[[Category:Local advisory vote, California, 2010]]

Latest revision as of 08:07, 21 March 2014

2008 image of the Transbay Terminal
A San Francisco Transbay Terminal Advisory Vote, Proposition G was on the June 8, 2010 ballot in San Francisco, where it was overwhelmingly approved.[1]

Proposition G asked voters what they thought about the idea of making the Transbay Terminal the northern terminus of California’s High Speed Rail.

Supervisor Chris Daly was a leading supporter of a "yes" vote on the advisory question. The San Francisco Chamber of Commerce also supported the concept.[1]

Fundamentally, what was at issue was:

  • Whether the Caltrain station at Fourth and King, or the Transbay Terminal at Mission and First, will be the terminus of the California High Speed Rail System that will be built as the result of Californians approving Proposition 1A in 2008.
  • Whether state funds from Proposition 1A will pay for the costs of moving from the Caltrain Station to the Transbay Terminal.
  • Whether Quentin Kopp, San Francisco's delegate to the California High-Speed Rail Authority, will advocate for the Transbay Terminal. After the November 2008 election, Kopp said he did not think the state's high-speed rail money should be spent moving the Caltrain station. Instead, Kopp thought that San Franciscans should bear the approximate $2 billion cost to move the train station from Caltrain to the Transbay Terminal.[2]

According to a San Franciscan political pundit, the gist of Proposition G was to send a message to Kopp: "Dear Quentin Kopp, the San Francisco stop on the high-speed rail line is going to be that Transbay Terminal spot on Mission and First streets that we’ve had our heart set on for years. Seriously, stop mucking this up."[2]

Election results

Proposition G
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 120,788 83.76%
No23,42116.24%
These final, certified results are from the San Francisco County elections office.

Supporters

The San Francisco Chronicle's editorial board urged a "yes" vote on Proposition G: "Underscoring [the decision of high-speed rail authorities to use the Transbay Terminal for the northern terminus of the high-speed rail line] with a strong public endorsement should clear up any mystery about where the train line should run.[3]

Text of measure

The question on the ballot:

Shall it be City policy that the northern end of the planned San Francisco-to-Los Angeles high-speed rail line be located at the Transbay Transit Center at First and Mission streets?[4][5]

Background

  • In 1999, San Francisco voters by a margin of 70% voted to make it a city policy to extend the Caltrain station from Fourth and King streets up to the Transbay Terminal location on Mission and First streets.
  • In 2003, voters approved a 1/2 cent sales tax that would be in effect for 30 years to pay for transportation improvements, including moving Caltrain to the Transbay Terminal.
  • In 2008, 80% of San Francisco voters were in favor of the statewide proposition, Proposition 1A, which called for the sale of bonds to fund "the construction of a high-speed train system that connects the San Francisco Transbay Terminal to Los Angeles Union Station."[2]

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link
Wikipedia-logo-en.png

Wikipedia® has an article on:

References