Difference between revisions of "San Francisco Unified School District parcel tax, Proposition A (June 2010)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(results)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}A '''San Francisco Unified School District parcel tax, Proposition A''' ballot measure is on the {{jun08ca2010}} for voters in the San Francisco Unified School District in {{San Francisco}}.<ref>[http://www.beyondchron.org/articles/June_Ballot_Measures_Reflect_City_s_Political_Fault_Lines_7943.html ''Beyond Chron'', "June Ballot Measures Reflect City’s Political Fault Lines", March 24, 2010]</ref>
+
{{tnr}}A '''San Francisco Unified School District parcel tax, Proposition A''' ballot measure was on the {{jun08ca2010}} for voters in the San Francisco Unified School District in {{San Francisco}}, where it was '''approved.'''<ref>[http://www.beyondchron.org/articles/June_Ballot_Measures_Reflect_City_s_Political_Fault_Lines_7943.html ''Beyond Chron'', "June Ballot Measures Reflect City’s Political Fault Lines", March 24, 2010]</ref>
  
If Proposition A passes, property owners in the school district will continue to pay for another 20 years the $32.20/year or $16.10/unit per year on multi-family residential parcels that they have been paying since 1990.<ref>[http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/under-the-dome/Supes-back-schools-June-tax-renewal-measure--89034127.html ''San Francisco Examiner'', "Supes back school tax renewal measure", March 24, 2010]</ref>
+
* Yes: 72,045 (69.79%) {{approved}}
 +
* No: 31,189 (30.21%)
 +
 
 +
With the enactment of Proposition A, property owners in the school district will continue to pay for another 20 years the $32.20/year or $16.10/unit per year on multi-family residential parcels that they have been paying since 1990.<ref>[http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/under-the-dome/Supes-back-schools-June-tax-renewal-measure--89034127.html ''San Francisco Examiner'', "Supes back school tax renewal measure", March 24, 2010]</ref>
  
 
Funds raised from the tax can only be used for capital improvements.  The tax is expected to generate about $7 million a year and is used primarily for seismic work and general maintenance on the more-than-100 school buildings in the district.<Ref name=sfc>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/05/15/EDDH1DD0RA.DTL&type=politics ''San Francisco Chronicle'', "San Francisco's ballot measures", May 16, 2010]</ref>
 
Funds raised from the tax can only be used for capital improvements.  The tax is expected to generate about $7 million a year and is used primarily for seismic work and general maintenance on the more-than-100 school buildings in the district.<Ref name=sfc>[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/05/15/EDDH1DD0RA.DTL&type=politics ''San Francisco Chronicle'', "San Francisco's ballot measures", May 16, 2010]</ref>
Line 7: Line 10:
 
==Supporters==
 
==Supporters==
  
* Some parents are canvassing neighborhoods to encourage residents to vote "yes" on Proposition A.<ref>[http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/Parents-canvas-for-parcel-tax-renewal-92597879.html ''San Francisco Examiner'', "Parents canvas for parcel tax renewal", May 2, 2010]</ref>
+
* Some parents canvassed neighborhoods to encourage residents to vote "yes" on Proposition A.<ref>[http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/Parents-canvas-for-parcel-tax-renewal-92597879.html ''San Francisco Examiner'', "Parents canvas for parcel tax renewal", May 2, 2010]</ref>
  
* The [[San Francisco Chronicle]]'s editorial board is endorsing a "yes" vote on Proposition A.<ref name=sfc/>
+
* The [[San Francisco Chronicle]]'s editorial board endorsed a "yes" vote on Proposition A.<ref name=sfc/>
  
 
==Ballot text==
 
==Ballot text==
Line 32: Line 35:
 
* [http://www.sfgov2.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/elections/ElectionsArchives/Meeting_Information/BSC/agendas/2010/Legal%20text-SFUSD%20RESOLUTION%20RE%20NO%2090-1%20doc_2010_03_12_FINAL.pdf Legal text of Proposition A]
 
* [http://www.sfgov2.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/elections/ElectionsArchives/Meeting_Information/BSC/agendas/2010/Legal%20text-SFUSD%20RESOLUTION%20RE%20NO%2090-1%20doc_2010_03_12_FINAL.pdf Legal text of Proposition A]
 
* [http://www.sfgov2.org/index.aspx?page=825 Official ballot proposition list for San Francisco's June 8, 2010 election]
 
* [http://www.sfgov2.org/index.aspx?page=825 Official ballot proposition list for San Francisco's June 8, 2010 election]
 +
* [http://sfelections.org/results/20100608/summary.php June 8, 2010 election results, San Francisco]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 07:10, 10 June 2010

A San Francisco Unified School District parcel tax, Proposition A ballot measure was on the June 8, 2010 ballot for voters in the San Francisco Unified School District in San Francisco, where it was approved.[1]
  • Yes: 72,045 (69.79%) Approveda
  • No: 31,189 (30.21%)

With the enactment of Proposition A, property owners in the school district will continue to pay for another 20 years the $32.20/year or $16.10/unit per year on multi-family residential parcels that they have been paying since 1990.[2]

Funds raised from the tax can only be used for capital improvements. The tax is expected to generate about $7 million a year and is used primarily for seismic work and general maintenance on the more-than-100 school buildings in the district.[3]

Supporters

  • Some parents canvassed neighborhoods to encourage residents to vote "yes" on Proposition A.[4]

Ballot text

ShowImage.jpg

The question on the ballot:

Proposition A: To improve earthquake and fire safety and implement critical capital maintenance of its schools

and facilities, shall the San Francisco Unified School District be authorized to renew the levy of an annual special tax not to exceed $32.20 per parcel for single family residential and nonresidential parcels and $16.10 per dwelling unit for mixed use and multifamily residential parcels, adjusted for inflation, in its Community Facilities District No. 90-1, and establish its annual appropriations limit at $16,000,000?[5]

See also

External links

BallotpediaAvatar bigger.png
Suggest a link

References

  1. Beyond Chron, "June Ballot Measures Reflect City’s Political Fault Lines", March 24, 2010
  2. San Francisco Examiner, "Supes back school tax renewal measure", March 24, 2010
  3. 3.0 3.1 San Francisco Chronicle, "San Francisco's ballot measures", May 16, 2010
  4. San Francisco Examiner, "Parents canvas for parcel tax renewal", May 2, 2010
  5. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.

Flag of California.png

This California-related article is a stub. You can help people learn about California politics by expanding it.