Read the State Legislative Tracker. New edition available now!

Difference between revisions of "Sonoma Valley Healthcare District bond proposition, Measure C (May 2006)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - ""," to ","")
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tnr}}A '''Sonoma Valley Healthcare District bond proposition, Measure C''' ballot question was on the [[May 2, 2006 ballot measures in California|May 2, 2006 ballot]] for voters in the Sonoma Valley Healthcare District in [[Sonoma County, California ballot measures#2006|Sonoma County]], where it was '''overwhelmingly defeated'''.<ref name=bond>[http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/SONOMA-VALLEY-Battle-rages-over-hospital-2500446.php ''San Francisco Chronicle'', "Battle rages over hospital measure / New building plan includes taking land by eminent domain", April 3, 2006]</ref>
+
{{tnr}}A '''Sonoma Valley Healthcare District bond proposition, Measure C''' ballot question was on the [[May 2, 2006 ballot measures in California|May 2, 2006 ballot]] for voters in the Sonoma Valley Healthcare District in [[Sonoma County, California ballot measures#2006|Sonoma County]], where it was '''overwhelmingly defeated'''.<ref name=bond>[http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/SONOMA-VALLEY-Battle-rages-over-hospital-2500446.php ''San Francisco Chronicle'', "Battle rages over hospital measure / New building plan includes taking land by eminent domain," April 3, 2006]</ref>
  
 
If Measure C had been approved, it would have authorized the Sonoma Valley Healthcare District to borrow '''$148 million.'''
 
If Measure C had been approved, it would have authorized the Sonoma Valley Healthcare District to borrow '''$148 million.'''
Line 5: Line 5:
 
The funds would have been used to build a new hospital, which would have allowed the closure of the existing hospital managed by the public health care district.
 
The funds would have been used to build a new hospital, which would have allowed the closure of the existing hospital managed by the public health care district.
  
According to the ''[[San Francisco Chronicle]]'', Measure C was "one of the most divisive issues in recent memory". This was primarily because the public health care district planned to build the new hospital on 16-acres; to obtain the land, it planned to "seize [it] through the power of eminent domain." The land in question belonged to the Leveroni family, "a longtime local ranching family", which was opposed to the plan to have their land seized.<ref name=tax/>
+
According to the ''[[San Francisco Chronicle]]'', Measure C was "one of the most divisive issues in recent memory". This was primarily because the public health care district planned to build the new hospital on 16-acres; to obtain the land, it planned to "seize [it] through the power of eminent domain." The land in question belonged to the Leveroni family, "a longtime local ranching family," which was opposed to the plan to have their land seized.<ref name=tax/>
  
 
A {{2/3}} was needed for approval.
 
A {{2/3}} was needed for approval.
  
One year after the vote on Measure C, voters approved [[Sonoma Valley Healthcare District parcel tax, Measure B (March 2007)|Measure B, a $195/year parcel tax]]. During the campaign for [[Sonoma Valley Healthcare District parcel tax, Measure B (March 2007)|Measure B]], the hospital's CEO, Robert Kowal, resigned in order to shore up support for Measure B.<ref>[http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=SA&p_theme=sa&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1170C4453B213118&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM ''Press Democrat'', "SONOMA ACCEPTS RESIGNATION OF HOSPITAL CEO: EXECUTIVE QUITS TO DEFUSE COMMUNITY ANGER OVER EMINENT DOMAIN MEASURE AS NEW TAX HEADS TO VOTERS IN MARCH", February 1, 2007]</ref> Board member John MacConaghy also resigned.<ref>[http://www.pressdemocrat.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070202/NEWS/702020346/1033/NEWS01 ''Press Democrat'', "Tax fight", February 2, 2007]</ref> Kowal and MacConaghy were unpopular with some voting blocs in the community because they had advocated for 2006's Measure C.
+
One year after the vote on Measure C, voters approved [[Sonoma Valley Healthcare District parcel tax, Measure B (March 2007)|Measure B, a $195/year parcel tax]]. During the campaign for [[Sonoma Valley Healthcare District parcel tax, Measure B (March 2007)|Measure B]], the hospital's CEO, Robert Kowal, resigned in order to shore up support for Measure B.<ref>[http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=SA&p_theme=sa&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1170C4453B213118&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM ''Press Democrat'', "SONOMA ACCEPTS RESIGNATION OF HOSPITAL CEO: EXECUTIVE QUITS TO DEFUSE COMMUNITY ANGER OVER EMINENT DOMAIN MEASURE AS NEW TAX HEADS TO VOTERS IN MARCH," February 1, 2007]</ref> Board member John MacConaghy also resigned.<ref>[http://www.pressdemocrat.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070202/NEWS/702020346/1033/NEWS01 ''Press Democrat'', "Tax fight," February 2, 2007]</ref> Kowal and MacConaghy were unpopular with some voting blocs in the community because they had advocated for 2006's Measure C.
  
 
Two years after the vote on Measure C, voters in the district approved [[Sonoma Valley Healthcare District bond proposition, Measure P (November 2008)|Measure P]], a $35 million bond request.
 
Two years after the vote on Measure C, voters in the district approved [[Sonoma Valley Healthcare District bond proposition, Measure P (November 2008)|Measure P]], a $35 million bond request.

Revision as of 07:11, 21 March 2014

A Sonoma Valley Healthcare District bond proposition, Measure C ballot question was on the May 2, 2006 ballot for voters in the Sonoma Valley Healthcare District in Sonoma County, where it was overwhelmingly defeated.[1]

If Measure C had been approved, it would have authorized the Sonoma Valley Healthcare District to borrow $148 million.

The funds would have been used to build a new hospital, which would have allowed the closure of the existing hospital managed by the public health care district.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, Measure C was "one of the most divisive issues in recent memory". This was primarily because the public health care district planned to build the new hospital on 16-acres; to obtain the land, it planned to "seize [it] through the power of eminent domain." The land in question belonged to the Leveroni family, "a longtime local ranching family," which was opposed to the plan to have their land seized.[2]

A 2/3rds supermajority vote was needed for approval.

One year after the vote on Measure C, voters approved Measure B, a $195/year parcel tax. During the campaign for Measure B, the hospital's CEO, Robert Kowal, resigned in order to shore up support for Measure B.[3] Board member John MacConaghy also resigned.[4] Kowal and MacConaghy were unpopular with some voting blocs in the community because they had advocated for 2006's Measure C.

Two years after the vote on Measure C, voters in the district approved Measure P, a $35 million bond request.

Election results

Measure C
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No9,32177.1%
Yes 2,769 22.9%
These final, certified, election results are from the Sonoma County elections office.

See also

External links

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

References