Difference between revisions of "South Carolina Gubernatorial Elections, Amendment 1 (2012)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (moved South Carolina Government Restructure Amendment (2012) to South Carolina Gubernatorial Elections Amendment (2012): Text replace - 'South Carolina Government Restructure Amendment (2012)' to 'South Carolina Gubernatorial Elections Amendme)
m (Text replace - "s'' "" to "s'', "")
(27 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SCConstitution}}
+
{{Ballot measure information |
{{tnr}}The '''South Carolina Government Restructure Amendments''' may appear on the [[South Carolina 2012 ballot measures|November 2012 ballot]] in the state of [[South Carolina]] as {{lrcafull}}s. One measure would require that candidates for governor to select their running mates for lieutenant governor. The proposal was introduced in [[Dates of 2011 state legislative sessions|2011 legislative session]].<ref name="Senate">[http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/d2130d0a40d8499798a3ccf635369209/SC-XGR--SC-Governor-Lt-Gov/ ''Associated Press'' "SC Senate passes measure to ask voters if lieutenant governor, governor should share ticket," April 26, 2012]</ref>
+
name        =  Gubernatorial Elections Amendment |
 +
image  = [[File:Flag of South Carolina.png|link=List of South Carolina ballot measures|120px]] |
 +
type  = {{lrcafull}} |
 +
constitution  =  [[South Carolina Constitution]]|
 +
statute  =  |
 +
referred  = [[South Carolina Legislature]] |
 +
topic = [[Elections and campaigns on the ballot|Elections]]|
 +
status = {{approved}} |
 +
}}
 +
{{tnr}}The '''South Carolina Gubernatorial Elections Amendment''' was on the [[South Carolina 2012 ballot measures|November 6, 2012 ballot]] in the state of [[South Carolina]] as a {{lrcafull}}, where it was '''approved'''. The measure required that candidates for governor select their running mates for lieutenant governor. The proposal was introduced in [[Dates of 2011 state legislative sessions|2011 legislative session]].<ref name="Senate">[http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/d2130d0a40d8499798a3ccf635369209/SC-XGR--SC-Governor-Lt-Gov/ ''Associated Press'', "SC Senate passes measure to ask voters if lieutenant governor, governor should share ticket," April 26, 2012]</ref> Read more about the story behind this amendment at: [[The dreaded promotion: South Carolina's lieutenant governorship]].
 +
==Election results==
 +
:: ''See also: [[2012 ballot measure election results]]''
 +
 
 +
The following are '''official''' election results:
 +
 
 +
{{Short outcome
 +
| title = South Carolina Amendment 1
 +
| yes = 1,009,367
 +
| yespct = 55.51
 +
| no = 809,063
 +
| nopct = 44.49
 +
| image = {{approved}}
 +
| unresolved =
 +
}}
 +
[[Category:Approved, general, 2012]]
 +
 
 +
'''46 out of 46 counties completely reported.'''
 +
 
 +
Results via [http://www.enr-scvotes.org/SC/42513/113010/en/summary.html South Carolina State Election Commission].
 +
 
 +
==Text of measure==
 +
The official ballot text read as follows:<ref>[http://www.scvotes.org/2012/08/14/2012_constitutional_amendment_question ''South Carolina State Elections Commission'',"Ballot measure 1," accessed October 1, 2012]</ref>
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>'''Amendment 1'''<br/><br/>
 +
 
 +
Beginning with the general election of 2018, must Section 8 of Article IV of the Constitution of this State be amended to provide that the Lieutenant Governor must be elected jointly with the Governor in a manner prescribed by law; and upon the joint election to add Section 37 to Article III of the Constitution of this State to provide that the Senate shall elect from among the members thereof a President to preside over the Senate and to perform other duties as provided by law; to delete Sections 9 and 10 of Article IV of the Constitution of this State containing inconsistent provisions providing that the Lieutenant Governor is President of the Senate, ex officio, and while presiding in the Senate, has no vote, unless the Senate is equally divided; to amend Section 11 to provide that the Governor shall fill a vacancy in the Office of Lieutenant Governor by appointing a successor with the advice and consent of the Senate; and to amend Section 12 of Article IV of the Constitution of this State to conform appropriate references?<br/><br/>
 +
 
 +
'''Explanation'''<br/><br/>
 +
 
 +
A 'Yes' vote will require, from 2018 onward, the Governor and Lieutenant Governor to run on the same ticket and be elected to office jointly. As a result, the Lieutenant Governor will no longer preside over the Senate and the Senate will elect their presiding officer from within the Senate body.<br/><br/>
 +
 
 +
A ‘No' vote maintains the current method of electing the Governor and Lieutenant Governor separately. The Lieutenant Governor shall continue to serve as President of the Senate.</blockquote>
 +
==Support==
 +
''No formal campaign in favor of the measure was identified by Ballotpedia.''
 +
==Opposition==
 +
''No formal campaign in opposition of the measure was identified by Ballotpedia.''
  
 
==Path to the ballot==
 
==Path to the ballot==
Line 8: Line 53:
 
During late [[BC2011#April|April 2011]] the [[Judiciary Committee, South Carolina Senate|Senate Judiciary Committee]] approved the measure to be considered before the full [[South Carolina State Senate|Senate]] with a vote of 18-4.
 
During late [[BC2011#April|April 2011]] the [[Judiciary Committee, South Carolina Senate|Senate Judiciary Committee]] approved the measure to be considered before the full [[South Carolina State Senate|Senate]] with a vote of 18-4.
  
On [[BC2012#April|April 26, 2012]], the measure passed the Senate with a vote of 34-1.<ref name="Senate"/>
+
On [[BC2012#April|April 26, 2012]], the measure passed the Senate with a vote of 34-1. The measure was later approved by the [[South Carolina House of Representatives]], and therefore it was sent to the ballot<ref name="Senate"/>
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 
* [[2012 ballot measures]]
 
* [[2012 ballot measures]]
 
* [[South Carolina 2012 ballot measures]]
 
* [[South Carolina 2012 ballot measures]]
 
+
===Additional reading===
 +
* [[The dreaded promotion: South Carolina's lieutenant governorship]]
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
* [http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess119_2011-2012/bills/3152.htm H. 3152 (text of bill)]
 
* [http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess119_2011-2012/bills/3152.htm H. 3152 (text of bill)]
Line 23: Line 69:
 
{{South Carolina}}
 
{{South Carolina}}
  
[[Category:South Carolina 2012 ballot measures]]
+
[[Category:South Carolina 2012 ballot measures, certified]]
[[Category:Administration of government, South Carolina]]
+
[[Category:Elections and campaigns, South Carolina]]
[[Category:Administration of government, 2012]]
+
[[Category:Certified, elections and campaigns, 2012]]
{{South Carolina stub}}
+
{{certrefca2012}}

Revision as of 06:32, 2 May 2014

Gubernatorial Elections Amendment
Flag of South Carolina.png
Click here for the latest news on U.S. ballot measures
Quick stats
Type:legislatively-referred constitutional amendment
Constitution:South Carolina Constitution
Referred by:South Carolina Legislature
Topic:Elections
Status:Approveda
The South Carolina Gubernatorial Elections Amendment was on the November 6, 2012 ballot in the state of South Carolina as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment, where it was approved. The measure required that candidates for governor select their running mates for lieutenant governor. The proposal was introduced in 2011 legislative session.[1] Read more about the story behind this amendment at: The dreaded promotion: South Carolina's lieutenant governorship.

Election results

See also: 2012 ballot measure election results

The following are official election results:

South Carolina Amendment 1
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 1,009,367 55.51%
No809,06344.49%

46 out of 46 counties completely reported.

Results via South Carolina State Election Commission.

Text of measure

The official ballot text read as follows:[2]

Amendment 1

Beginning with the general election of 2018, must Section 8 of Article IV of the Constitution of this State be amended to provide that the Lieutenant Governor must be elected jointly with the Governor in a manner prescribed by law; and upon the joint election to add Section 37 to Article III of the Constitution of this State to provide that the Senate shall elect from among the members thereof a President to preside over the Senate and to perform other duties as provided by law; to delete Sections 9 and 10 of Article IV of the Constitution of this State containing inconsistent provisions providing that the Lieutenant Governor is President of the Senate, ex officio, and while presiding in the Senate, has no vote, unless the Senate is equally divided; to amend Section 11 to provide that the Governor shall fill a vacancy in the Office of Lieutenant Governor by appointing a successor with the advice and consent of the Senate; and to amend Section 12 of Article IV of the Constitution of this State to conform appropriate references?

Explanation

A 'Yes' vote will require, from 2018 onward, the Governor and Lieutenant Governor to run on the same ticket and be elected to office jointly. As a result, the Lieutenant Governor will no longer preside over the Senate and the Senate will elect their presiding officer from within the Senate body.

A ‘No' vote maintains the current method of electing the Governor and Lieutenant Governor separately. The Lieutenant Governor shall continue to serve as President of the Senate.

Support

No formal campaign in favor of the measure was identified by Ballotpedia.

Opposition

No formal campaign in opposition of the measure was identified by Ballotpedia.

Path to the ballot

Section 1 of Article XVI of the South Carolina Constitution says that a legislatively-referred amendment can go on the ballot if approved by a 2/3rds vote of each house of the South Carolina State Legislature.

During late April 2011 the Senate Judiciary Committee approved the measure to be considered before the full Senate with a vote of 18-4.

On April 26, 2012, the measure passed the Senate with a vote of 34-1. The measure was later approved by the South Carolina House of Representatives, and therefore it was sent to the ballot[1]

See also

Additional reading

External links

References