Note: Ballotpedia will be read-only from 9pm CST on February 25-March 5 while Judgepedia is merged into Ballotpedia.
For status updates, visit
Ballotpedia's coverage of elections held on March 3, 2015, was limited. Select races were covered live, and all results will be added once the merger is complete.

Difference between revisions of "State legislative scorecards"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 55: Line 55:
Select “preview” to review your edit. If everything looks correct, select “save.”
Select “preview” to review your edit. If everything looks correct, select “save.”
If you have any questions or comments please email us at [].
If you have any questions or comments please email us at [].

Revision as of 09:18, 18 August 2014

State-Legislative Scorecards-Badge.png
State legislative scorecards

Legislative scorecards by state
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming

Often used in sports and business, scorecards note the improvement or lack thereof of a player, team or institution.

Similarly in politics, scorecards provide information on the status or progress of politicians and/or policy issues. They are aggregated on Ballotpedia profiles to help provide context for readers on an official’s term in office, a policy or an incumbent’s voting record.

Some scorecards are created with a focus on specific issues, while others are broad in scope.

On Ballotpedia, we define scorecards as those produced by newspapers, interest groups, state think tanks, partisan groups, 501c3s and 501c4s that provide relative rankings and covers all state or federal lawmakers.

Because scorecards can be specific to particular issues or general to a state’s legislative term, for example, each report should be considered on its own merits. Each entity that publishes these reports uses different methodologies and definitions for the terms used.

Ballotpedia is in the process of developing an encyclopedic list of published scorecards. We have begun the process of adding more in-depth descriptions about the reports and the scoring processes. However, for those that do not yet feature such descriptions, we offer a tutorial so you can help us expand these areas. See our writing guidelines below to contribute.

Common terms

  • Scorecards: a record used to measure achievement or progress. The measurement and subjects in the record vary in each publication.
  • Voter guides: the term voter guides generally refers to pamphlets published and distributed by state governments just prior to an election. However, non-government groups, such as nonprofits, newspapers and interest groups, also publish guides for voters’ use. The guides can be written in an unbiased nature and present only what will appear on the ballot or they display whether the group supports, opposes or is neutral on an issue or candidate. The latter version is similar to and can be considered a scorecard.
  • Indexes: can refer to an alphabetical list of names, topics or items. However, it is also defined as a measure or an indicator. The term “indexes” is also used in reference to what Ballotpedia classifies as “scorecards.”


To add a scorecard link

Go to State legislative scorecards in Texas. Replace Texas with the appropriate state name. Identify when the scorecard you plan to add was published and select [edit] for the appropriate year. Add a bullet point (using an asterisk) and the link to the scorecard. Cite the name of the organization and the name of the scorecard report. Add a sub-bullet point (use a colon and asterisk) to include a brief description of the organization and scorecard.


  • Legislators are scored on bills which relate to economic freedom, the size and scope of government, and individual liberty.

Select “preview” to review your edit. If everything looks correct, select “save.”

To expand a scorecard section

Visit a specific incumbent profile. Example - George Lavender. Create a subsection within the “Scorecards” section. For example: ===NAME==== Replace NAME with the name of the group’s scorecard. Below the subsection title write a description about the organization and include details about the produced scorecard. You should include: the tax status of a group (501c3, for example) if available, how frequently the report is published (annually? each legislative session?) what the scorecard is grading the scale used (for example, letter grades, percentages, a 0-100 scale) the issues being evaluated and how the group is measuring each incumbent (reviewing state budgets plus votes on budget-related bills proposed in the YEAR-YEAR session, for example) Add a subsection for the year. For example: ====YEAR==== Replace YEAR with the year the report was published. list the score given to the incumbent note how the incumbent fared in comparison to others (49th out of 150 legislators or in the top 25%)


Empower Texans Fiscal Responsibility Index

Empower Texans produces the Fiscal Responsibility Index as "a measurement of how lawmakers perform on size and role of government issues." The index uses "exemplar votes on core budget and free enterprise issues that demonstrate legislators' governing philosophy."[1] Legislators are graded along a standard grading scale, receiving grades A through F based on their performance during the legislative session.


George Lavender received a grade of B on the 2011 Fiscal Responsibility Index. He was one of eight representatives to receive the B grade. A total of 45 representatives received a grade of B+ or better.

Select “preview” to review your edit. If everything looks correct, select “save.”


If you have any questions or comments please email us at