Difference between revisions of "Tri County School District Non Residential Property Tax Renewal (May 2011)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - "ategory:School property tax,(.*)]]" to "ategory:Local property tax,$1]] Category:Local school tax,$1 ")
Line 22: Line 22:
[[Category:Michigan 2011 local ballot measures]]
[[Category:Michigan 2011 local ballot measures]]
[[Category:School property tax, Michigan, 2011]]
[[Category:Local property tax, Michigan, 2011]]
[[Category:Local school tax, Michigan, 2011]]

Revision as of 17:02, 13 October 2012

School bonds
& taxes
Portal:School Bond and Tax Elections
Bond elections
All years and states
Property tax elections
All years and states
See also
State comparisons
How voting works
Approval rates
A Tri County School District Non Residential Property Tax Renewal measure was on the May 3, 2011 ballot in the Tri County school district area which is in Kent, Newaygo and Montcalm Counties.

This measure was approved

  • YES 50 Approveda
  • NO 28 [1]


  • YES 652 (72.44%) Approveda
  • NO 248 (27.56%) [2]

This measure sought to renew the current levy on non residential property which is set at a rate of $18 per $1,000 of assessed property value for a single year in order to help pay for operational costs of the school district.[3]

Text of measure

The question on the ballot:

Shall the limitation on the amount of taxes which may be assessed against all property, except principal residence and other property exempted by law, in Tri County Area Schools, Montcalm, Kent and Newaygo Counties, Michigan, be increased by 18 mills ($18.00 on each $1,000 of taxable valuation) for the year 2011, to provide funds for operating purposes; the estimate of the revenue the school district will collect if the millage is approved and levied in 2011 is approximately $2,086,580 (this is a renewal of millage which expired with the 2010 tax levy)?[4]


  1. Kent County Elections, May Election Results
  2. Montcalm County Elections, Current Election Results
  3. Montcalm County Elections, May Ballot Proposals
  4. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.