Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "United States Senate elections, 2014"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(The 29 "Most Competitive Districts in 2014")
Line 81: Line 81:
 
===The 29 "Most Competitive Districts in 2014"===
 
===The 29 "Most Competitive Districts in 2014"===
  
{| class="wikitable sortable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" style="background:none" style="width:90%; text-align:center"  
+
{| class="wikitable sortable collapsible" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" style="background:none" style="width:90%; text-align:center"  
 
|-
 
|-
 
! colspan="7" align= "center" style="background:#000000; color: white;"|'''Color Key'''
 
! colspan="7" align= "center" style="background:#000000; color: white;"|'''Color Key'''
Line 105: Line 105:
 
|}
 
|}
  
{| class="wikitable sortable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" style="background:none" style="width:100%; text-align:center"  
+
{| class="wikitable sortable collapsible" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1" style="background:none" style="width:100%; text-align:center"  
 
|-
 
|-
 
! colspan="12" align= "center" style="background:#000000; color: white;"|'''Most competitive districts for 2014 elections'''
 
! colspan="12" align= "center" style="background:#000000; color: white;"|'''Most competitive districts for 2014 elections'''

Revision as of 17:25, 25 November 2013

2012

CongressLogo.png

2014 U.S. Senate Elections

Election Date
November 4, 2014

U.S. Senate Elections by State
Alabama • Alaska • Arkansas • Colorado • Delaware • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Montana • Nebraska • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • North Carolina • Oklahoma • Oregon • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Virginia • West Virginia • Wyoming

U.S. House Elections by State
Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

Elections Information
Election DatesVoting in Primaries
Voting on November 4, 2014
Poll Opening and Closing Times
Contents
1 Partisan breakdown
1.1 Open seats
2 Campaign finance
2.1 April 2013
2.2 August 2013
2.3 National Republican Senatorial Committee
2.4.1 NRSC fundraising worries
3 Ballotpedia's battleground districts
3.1 Five criteria for “most competitive”
3.2 The 29 "Most Competitive Districts in 2014"
4 Outside race ratings
4.1 Cook Political Report
4.1.1 Changes by month
4.2 New York Times
4.3 Most vulnerable seats
4.4 Washington Post
5 Issues heading into 2014
6 State-by-state breakdown
7 See also

Elections to the U.S. Senate will be held on November 4, 2014. A total of 33 of the 100 seats will be up for regular election. Additionally, two special elections will take place in 2014 to fill vacancies that occurred in the 113th Congress (Hawaii and South Carolina).

Those elected to the U.S. Senate on November 4, 2014 in the 33 regular elections will commence serving six-year terms on January 3, 2015.

2014 marks the 100th anniversary of the direct popular election of U.S. Senators. Prior to the ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1913, U.S. Senators were selected by state legislatures.

As of July 2013, seven senators had announced they would not be running for re-election. In comparison, ten incumbent senators did not run for re-election in 2012 and twelve did not run for re-election in 2010.

Partisan breakdown

The following table displays the partisan composition of the U.S. Senate heading into the 2014 elections.

In 2014, Republicans would need to pick up six seats currently held by Democrats in order to gain a majority.[1]

Three incumbent Democratic U.S. Senators (Max Baucus of Montana, Tim Johnson of South Dakota and Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia) have announced that they are not running for re-election in 2014, and the GOP is considered a favorite to pick up the seats they are leaving vacant.[1] Three other states with Democratic U.S. Senators up for re-election in 2014 (Alaska, Arkansas and North Carolina) are generally considered to have GOP-leaning electorates.[1]

In 2012, the Democratic Party retained control over the chamber, winning 25 of the 33 seats. With Republican candidates winning only eight seats, this was the worst performance by a major party since the 1950s.[2]


U.S. Senate Partisan Breakdown
Party As of April 2014 After the 2014 Election
     Democratic Party 53 Pending
     Republican Party 45 Pending
     Independent 2 Pending
Total 100 100

Open seats

As of July 15, 2013, seven senators have announced they will not be running for re-election in 2014:

  • Democratic Party

4 Democrats

  • Republican Party

2 Republicans


Name:Party:Current office:
Carl LevinElectiondot.png Democratic Michigan
Jay RockefellerElectiondot.png Democratic West Virginia
Mike JohannsEnds.png Republican Nebraska
Saxby ChamblissEnds.png Republican Georgia
Tim JohnsonElectiondot.png Democratic South Dakota
Tom HarkinElectiondot.png Democratic Iowa

Campaign finance

April 2013

According to an April 2013 Politico report, incumbent Democrats in red states raised "millions" in the first three months of 2013.[3] The candidates highlighted in the article were:

  • Democratic Party Mary Landrieu (LA) had raised $1.2 million and had $3.5 million cash on hand
  • Democratic Party Mark Pryor (AK) had raised $1.9 million and had $3.4 million cash on hand
  • Democratic Party Kay Hagan (NC) had raised $1.6 million and had $2.7 million cash on hand
  • Democratic Party Mark Begich (AK) had raised $948,000 and had $1.5 million cash on hand[3]

August 2013

An August 2013 Politico report reported that the 27 incumbents running for re-election in 2014 had together raised about $125 million by the end of June 2013.[4] The report also found that 2014 may be the most expensive midterm election to date, pointing to the fact that the total amount raised for incumbents seeking re-election is $30 million more than at the same point in 2012 and on par with the amount they had raised in 2010.[4]

The incumbents highlighted in the article were:[4]

National Republican Senatorial Committee

In July 2013, National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) president, Rob Collins, circulated a memo to top donors outlining the path to a majority in the Senate for the Republican Party. From the memo:

"Montana now joins West Virginia and South Dakota as the third red-state where Democrats have not only failed to land their top candidates, but to recruit a candidate capable of winning a general election matchup."

Collins went on to state that Republicans need to win just three seats in states with incumbent Democratic senators.[5]

NRSC fundraising worries

In September 2013, Politico released a report fundraising and internal problems within the NRSC. The group had only raised $21.7 million through September in 2013, which was $5 million less than it had at the same time in 2009, with 2010 being the most recent midterm elections.
There was also speculation that a staff chasm has left some staffers loyal to Sen. Jerry Moran (R-KS), the acting NRSC chairman, while others fall more in line with Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH), the vice chairman of finance.[6]

Ballotpedia's battleground districts

See also: U.S. House battleground districts, 2014
The purple districts on the Census district map are those found to be competitive in Ballotpedia's study.

Five criteria for “most competitive”

A district must have met one or more of the following criteria:

1. If a district had all six quantifiable predictions/results highlighted (Cook, Fairvote, MOV, 2012 presidential, 2008 presidential, and incumbent years in office) and four were of the most competitive nature, purple, they automatically made the cut.

19 districts fit in this category.

2. If a district had all six quantifiable predictions/results highlighted (Cook, Fairvote, MOV, 2012 presidential, 2008 presidential, and incumbent years in office) and three were of the most competitive nature, purple, at least two were of the intermediate competitiveness (orange), and they had a “special factor” to the competition (outside spending, redistricting) they were added to the list.

Two districts fit into this category.

3. Anomalies: This includes Republicans or Democrats in a district that otherwise trends heavily toward the other party. The district must also have some other qualifying factor, such as a MOV of ten percent or less, an incumbent who has served less than ten years or a competitive 2014 candidate. (UT-04, for example)

Three districts fit into this category.

4. Presidential differences: A district that may not have all the categories highlighted, but has voted for the other party in the most recent presidential election and the numbers are tight for the incumbent (redistricting was also factored in here).

Two districts were considered “Most Competitive” based only on this factor.

5. Recent effects of redistricting: This is relevant to three districts (IL-12, IL-13 and MN-08). Redistricting in the past three years has caused these districts to be extremely tight and have the opportunity for a very close midterm election (the first midterm cycle these new districts will be going through).

Three districts were pushed into the most competitive list because of this, just missing meeting the other criteria listed above.

The 29 "Most Competitive Districts in 2014"

Color Key
Color Cook Partisan Voting Index Fairvote (Projected D%) Margin of Victory (MOV) 2012 Presidential MOV % % 2008 Presidential MOV % Incumbent years in office
Purple- most competitive Even; R or D 0-4 45.1% - 54.9% 0-4.9 0-4.9 0-4.9 0 - 4
Orange- very competitive R or D 5-7 42.1% - 45.0%; 55% - 57.9% 5.0-7.9 5.0-7.9 5.0-7.9 5 - 7
Green- competitive R or D 8-10 40.0% - 42.0%; 58% - 60% 8.0-10.00 8.0-10.00 8.0-10.00 8 - 10
House winners labeled this color indicate the party of the House winner being different from the party of the presidential winner of the district in 2012
Districts labeled this color indicate the districts that were pushed into most competitive based on heavily redrawn congressional districts
Most competitive districts for 2014 elections
Congressional district Battleground label Cook PVI Fairvote (Projected D%) Margin of Victory (MOV) in 2012 2012 Presidential MOV % 2008 Presidential MOV % Incumbent years in office 2012 House winner Campaign contributions difference Cost per vote for winner in 2012
Arizona's 1st Battleground D R+4 48% 3.6 -2.5 -3.2 0 Democratic 61.38% $19.13
Arizona's 2nd Battleground D R+3 50.9% 0.8 -1.5 -0.9 0 Democratic 65.57% $18.85
Arizona's 9th Battleground D R+1 51% 4.1 ✓4.5 ✓3.9 0 Democratic 64.44% $17.78
California's 7th Battleground D EVEN 51.4% 3.4 ✓4 ✓5 0 Democratic 57.34% $25.72
California's 10th Battleground R R+1 43.4% 5.4 ✓3.6 ✓3 2 Republican 61.05% $25.00
California's 21st Battleground R D+2 50.9% 15.5 ✓11.1 ✓6 0 Republican 91.39% $19.59
California's 36th Battleground D R+1 51.2% 5.9 ✓3.2 ✓3 0 Democratic 46.67% $17.94
Colorado's 6th Battleground R D+1 45.1% 2 ✓5.1 ✓8.7 4 Republican 66.81% $20.99
Florida's 13th Battleground D R+1 40.9% 15.1 ✓1.5 ✓3.8 42 Republican 66.81% $5.49
Florida's 18th Battleground D R+3 47.7% 0.6 -4.1 ✓3.1 0 Democratic 19.70% $28.58
Florida's 26th Battleground D R+1 53.1% 10.6 ✓6.7 -0.4 0 Democratic 69.59% $10.28
Illinois' 12th Battleground D EVEN 50.1% 8.9 ✓1.5 ✓11.1 0 Democratic 46.64% $7.52
Illinois' 13th Battleground R EVEN 47.2% 0.3 -0.3 ✓11 0 Republican 51.38% $10.22
Michigan's 1st Battleground R R+5 45.1% 0.5 -8.3 ✓1.3 2 Republican 59.74% $13.30
Minnesota's 8th Battleground D D+1 52.4% 8.9 ✓5.5 ✓8.6 0 Democratic 34.52% $6.52
Nevada's 3rd Battleground R EVEN 44.2% 7.5 ✓0.8 ✓8.9 2 Republican 61.24% $17.66
New Hampshire's 1st Battleground D R+1 50.4% 3.8 ✓1.6 ✓6.4 0 Democratic 47.47% $10.02
New Jersey's 2nd Battleground R D+1 40.2% 17.4 ✓8.1 ✓7.7 18 Republican 96.60% $9.40
New Jersey's 3rd Battleground R R+1 44.8% 8.9 ✓4.6 ✓3.4 2 Republican 66.17% $11.94
New York's 1st Battleground D R+2 51.3% 4.6 ✓0.5 ✓3 10 Democratic 54.54% $18.81
New York's 11th Battleground R R+2 46.1% 5 ✓4.3 -3 2 Republican 70.91% $21.96
New York's 18th Battleground D EVEN 51.5% 3.7 ✓4.3 ✓5 0 Democratic 40.94% $15.69
New York's 21st Battleground D EVEN 51.5% 1.9 ✓6.1 ✓5 4 Democratic 50.05% $15.54
New York's 23rd Battleground R R+3 45.6% 3.6 -1.2 ✓1 3 Republican 71.76% $15.31
North Carolina's 7th Battleground D R+12 48.9% 0.2 -19.3 -16 16 Democratic 60.83% $13.66
Texas' 23rd Battleground D R+3 48.7% 4.8 -2.6 ✓1 0 Democratic 39.93% $18.65
Utah's 4th Battleground D R+16 46.8% 0.3 -37 -15.2 12 Democratic 48.51% $19.70
Virginia's 2nd Battleground R R+2 43.4% 7.7 ✓1.5 ✓1.7 2 Republican 54.38% $14.42
West Virginia's 3rd Battleground D R+14 50.4% 7.1 -32.2 -13.4 20 Democratic 69.55% $13.26
  • Cook's PVI is Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index.[7]
  • FairVote's %D is FairVote.org's 2014 congressional election projections.[8]
According to our study, only 16 states will have one or more competitive districts in 2014.
  • Both the 2012 and 2008 presidential MOV have either "✓" or "-" before the number. The "✓" indicates the district went in favor of the winner, in both years this was President Obama. The "-" indicates the district favored the Republican who lost in each election, Romney in 2012 and McCain in 2008.

Outside race ratings

U.S. Senate predictions
Prediction from: Month Solid D Likely D Lean D Tossup Lean R Likely R Solid R
Rothenberg Political Report June 28, 2013 12 1 1 5 2 2 12
Sabato's Crystal Ball June 27, 2013 7 3 3 5 2 3 11
Rothenberg Political Report October 16, 2013 12 2 2 2 1 4 12

Cook Political Report

Each month the Cook Political Report releases race ratings for President, U.S. Senate, U.S. House (competitive only) and Governors. There are seven possible designations:[9]

     Solid D
     Likely D
     Lean D

     Tossup

     Lean R
     Likely R
     Solid R

Cook Political Report Race Rating -- U.S. Senate
Month Solid D Likely D Lean D Tossup Lean R Likely R Solid R Total D Total R Total races
June 27, 2013[10] 6 5 6 3 0 4 11 17 15 35
August 2, 2013[11] 7 4 6 2 3 2 11 17 16 35
October 17, 2013[12] 7 4 6 2 3 2 11 17 16 35
December 19, 2013[13] 7 5 4 3 3 1 12 16 16 35
February 7, 2014[14] 6 6 4 3 3 1 13 16 17 36
February 27, 2014[15] 6 5 5 3 3 1 13 16 17 36
March 19, 2014[16] 8 2 3 7 2 2 12 13 16 36

Changes by month

July 2013

  • From June 27, 2013 to August 2, 2013, Cook's race ratings changed in the following states:
    • Virginia went from Likely Democrat to Solid Democrat
    • Arkansas went from Likely Democrat to Solid Democrat
    • Iowa went from Lean Democrat to Tossup
    • Montana went from Tossup to Lean Republican
    • West Virginia went from Tossup to Lean Republican
    • Georgia went from Lean Republican to Likely Republican
    • Kentucky went from Likely Republican to Tossup

New York Times

According to an analysis by Nate Silver of The New York Times, Democrats are looking at a tough road ahead of them in the U.S. Senate in 2014. Democrats hold 21 of the 35 seats up for election in 2014, and there are more Democratic controlled seats that lean Republican than Republican seats that lean Democratic.[17]

Additionally, Democrats could suffer from a lower voter turnout of their base due to the fact that 2014 is a midterm election and President Obama will not be on the ballot.[17]

However, Republicans need to take six seats in order to gain control of the Senate, a large gain that will be difficult to accomplish even in a favorable environment. Based on the data below, at this very early stage Republicans are expected to be able to pick up four or five seats.[17]

The table below lists the initial race ratings overview for the 35 senate seats up for election in 2014 as of February 2013.[17]

The New York Times Race Ratings -- U.S. Senate
Month Solid D Likely D Lean D Tossup Lean R Likely R Solid R
February 20, 2013[18] 6 7 3 4 0 4 11
July 15, 2013[19] 8 4 3 3 0 4 13
March 23, 2014[20] 10 2 3 1 1 4 16

Most vulnerable seats

The FiscalTimes compiled a list of the seven most vulnerable Senate seats up for election in 2014. The seven included in the list are: Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Dakota, and West Virginia. Going into the 2014 election, all seven seats are held by Democrats.[21]

Washington Post

In August 2013 The Washington Post compiled a list of the 10 Senate seats most likely to change control in 2014:[22]

  • Republican Party Georgia: After Michelle Nunn (D) announced her candidacy in July 2013, it greatly increased the chance for Democrats to pick up the seat. On the Republican side, as of August 2013 there already had been five major Republican candidates in the field that could break any which way.[22] Who emerges from that primary will be a huge determining factor when it comes to whether this race is competitive.[22]
  • Democratic Party Iowa: Democratic candidate Bruce Braley seems to be a capable fundraiser and looks set to cruise to his party’s nomination without any trouble.[22] The Republican primary, meanwhile, lacks a clear front-runner. While it features a former Senate aide, a conservative radio host, a former U.S. attorney, a state senator and possibly a retired businessman, Gov. Terry Branstad (R) says he likely won’t endorse in the primary.[22] Democrats have the advantage in this open race as of August 2013, but the political contours of the state suggest it is not out of the question that Republicans can compete there.
  • Democratic Party North Carolina: State house Speaker Thom Tillis (R) has been plagued by headlines about major donors getting seats on the UNC Board of Governors and the money he has received from the gaming industry, and criticism over his decision to launch a Senate campaign while the legislature was still in session.[22] According to Washington Post none of it means Tillis cannot compete with Sen. Kay Hagan (D), who remains vulnerable.[22] However, his rough start was not the way to begin what promises to be a hard-fought campaign.[22]
  • Republican Party Kentucky: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R) drew a self-funding primary challenge running to his ideological right as well as a Democratic challenger in Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes.[22] Despite a rocky start for Grimes, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee reportedly will ensure she has a solid team around her to make sure she avoids further rookie mistakes.[22] Polling as of Augsut 2013 suggests it is already a close race.[22] According to the Washington Post, "We think McConnell still is a slight favorite to come back to the Senate in 2015, but his chances got longer over the past month."[22]
  • Democratic Party Alaska: Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell appears to be the favorite, and 2010 nominee Joe Miller is the guy Republicans definitely don’t want. In the middle is the potential wild card, state Natural Resources Commissioner Dan Sullivan — not to be confused with the Anchorage mayor of the same name — who recently deployed to Afghanistan.[22] Treadwell didn’t get off to a fast start, raising just $180,000 in the first six months of 2013, and there is speculation that Sullivan, who is not a candidate yet, could start looking more attractive as an alternative.[22]
  • Democratic Party Arkansas: Rep. Tom Cotton (R) is the rare Republican recruit with the ability to unite the conservative grass roots and the Republican establishment, spelling trouble for Sen. Mark Pryor (D), the Senate’s most vulnerable incumbent, according to the Washington Post.[22]. Pryor has already taken criticism over the airwaves from both conservative groups on his right and a leading gun-control organization on his left.[22] When Cotton committed to running, things looked even bleaker for the Democrat.

Issues heading into 2014

[edit]

Government shutdown

See also United States budget debate, 2013

Beginning in August 2013, House and Senate members began discussing the possibility of a government shutdown over the funding of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). On September 20, Republicans passed a spending bill in the House that funds the government until December, but strips funding from Obamacare. When Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) announced that the Senate would hold a procedural vote on Wednesday, September 24, many senators began to announce their positions on voting against a cloture, the motion to end debate on a bill. After Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) gave a marathon speech, the motion for cloture was accepted and Reid was able to strip the Obamacare defunding language contained in the Republican House members' continuing resolution (CR).

Following the successful cloture vote and the Senate subsequently sending a clean continuing resolution back to the House, the two chambers began a high-stakes game of hot potato. By September 30, the House had voted and sent three resolutions to the Senate that all were struck down. The Senate then sent back a clean resolution stripped of any healthcare defunding language. With Obamacare being the issue-at-hand, Congress was unable to agree on whether a resolution would fund the landmark healthcare law.[23]

In the midst of the government shutdown in October 2013, talks began regarding the impending debt ceiling.

Polling during the shutdown

Congressional approval rating
Poll Total approve Total disapproveMargin of ErrorSample Size
The Economist/YouGov (September 21-23, 2013)
9%72%+/-5.1690
CBS/New York Times (September 19-23, 2013)
14%80%+/-31,014
CNN/ORC (September 27-29, 2013)
10%87%+/-3.5803
Gallup (October 3-6, 2013)
11%85%+/-41,028
AP-GfK (October 3-7, 2013)
5%83%+/-3.41,227
AVERAGES 9.8% 81.4% +/-3.8 952.4
Note: The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org

Approval of own congressmen

During the shutdown, American's disapproval rating of their own congressmen reached new a new high, with almost as many people stating disapproval of their member (43%) to approval (44%). The Gallup poll concluded:

"While members of Congress may continue to argue that problems with the image of the body as a whole is not their fault, and that they are doing nothing more than faithfully representing their particular constituents, it is clear that even their own constituents are less positive about the job they are doing than they were in the past."

Farm Bill

See also: United States Farm Bill 2013

The farm bill is an expansive piece of legislation that provides funding for commodity programs, conservation, trade, nutrition, credit, rural development, research, forestry, energy, horticulture, organic agriculture, livestock, crop insurance, disaster assistance programs and tax provisions.[24] The farm bill is typically passed every five years. The 2008 Farm bill expired September 30, 2012. Congress extended the 2008 bill for one more year, bringing us to the current controversy over the 2013 Farm Bill.[25]

The vast majority of the farm bill is nutrition--roughly 75% of the total farm bill. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) makes up about 72% of the nutrition budget. Crop insurance is expected to be the next largest budgetary expense.[24]

Nutrition and federal spending are in the cross hairs of the current farm bill debate. Republicans want to see cuts to the food assistance programs and Democrats are concerned with crop insurance fraud.[26] In an effort to push through some type of farm bill, the House has attempted to split food stamps from farm policy and create two separate bills. This is the first time since 1973 that food stamps have been split from farm policy.[27]

If the bill expires on September 30, 2013, effects of not having a new bill would not be seen until December 31, 2013, when the dairy price support program would end. If a new bill is not passed before the current one ends, the program would revert back to 1940's era agriculture laws. Crops would likely not be effected until summer of 2014, when the 2013 crop cycle ends.[28]

Syria

See also: United States involvement in Syria

In August 2012, President Obama said the "red line" for U.S. involvement in Syria was the use of chemical or biological weapons.[29] In April 2013, reports surfaced that Syria had used chemical weapons twice in their civil war, but it was not enough for the U.S. to intervene. In June 2013, President Obama authorized sending weapons to Syrian rebels following more reports of small scale chemical weapon attacks.[29]

On August 21, 2013, the Syrian government was accused of a chemical weapons attack on a town in the suburbs of Damascus, killing thousands, including women and children.[29] On September 3, 2013, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, Secretary of State John Kerry and General Martin Dempsey met with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to support President Obama's decision to use military force to intervene in the Syrian conflict.[30] The group met with the House Foreign Affairs Committee on September 5.[31]

See also: Gang of Eight

Most recently, the Gang of Eight has been used in reference to immigration reform and includes eight of the most influential Senators, with four from each party.[32][33]

On May 6, 2013 Senators John McCain (R), Chuck Schumer (D), Richard Durbin (D), Robert Menendez (D), Michael Bennet (D), Lindsey Graham (R), Marco Rubio (R), and Jeff Flake (R) unveiled the outlines of their bi-partisan immigration plan.[32][33] The statement of principles was rather broad, but sets forth “four basic pillars”:

  • 1. A “tough but fair path to citizenship . . . .contingent upon securing our borders and tracking whether legal immigrants have left the country as required”;
  • 2. Reform our legal immigration system with a greater eye toward our economic needs;
  • 3. Workplace verification; and
  • 4. Setting up a system for admitting future workers (although the term “guest worker” is not used).[33]

On June 27, 2013 in a late afternoon vote, the Senate voted to approve the immigration reform bill, Senate Bill 744.[34] The bill passed by a vote of 68-to-32, with 14 Republicans voting in favor.[35][34]

Speaker John Boehner told House Republicans in a closed-door meeting on July 10, 2013 that the internal debate over immigration reform is an “important conversation," and that while the House will not take up the Senate-passed bill, members must do something to address the issue.[36]

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D) on July 8, 2013 ridiculed the House’s strategy of using the “Hastert rule” to pass legislation and said Speaker John Boehner will eventually have to take up the Senate’s immigration bill.[37] Reid also said Boehner’s adherence to the “Hastert Rule” requiring a majority of Republican caucus votes to move legislation is emblematic of the lower chamber’s dysfunction.[38]

See also: United States Farm Bill 2013

The Senate passed a $1 trillion farm bill in June 2013 to fund both food stamps and farmer subsidies. States heavy in agriculture, including ones that will be competitive in 2014, may turn more favorably to Democratic candidates due to Republican opposition of the bill. The vote was 66-27, with 25 of the 27 nay votes being from Republicans. The two Democratic senators to vote against the bill were Jack Reed (RI) and Sheldon Whitehouse (RI)

Both Montana and South Dakota, with agriculture being a major industry, will reap the benefits of the bill and also have open seats due to the retirement of Max Baucus (D-MT) and Tim Johnson (D-SD). [39]

The comprehensive bill failed in the House due largely in part to the votes of 8 Democratic House members who joined the Republican majority to vote down the measure.[40] Reps. Collin Peterson, John Barrow, Sanford Bishop, Cheri Bustos, Sean Maloney, Mike McIntyre, Bill Owens, and Tim Walz were the 8 Democratic members who voted to reject the bill.[40] According to analysis by OpenSecrets, many of these Democratic members have received significant political contributions from agricultural organizations that benefit from crop insurance subsidies.[40] Five of the eight are on the House Agriculture Committee--Peterson, Bustos, Maloney, McIntyre, and Walz-- from which agribusiness firms routinely target committee members with sizable contributions.[40]

Upon arrival at the House, the bill was altered by focusing solely on the farm programs and did not include the food stamp program, which will be voted on later. The House and Senate will now need to draft a final bill through conference committee.[41]

For senators up for re-election in 2016, this will be the first election since the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This may be problematic for Democratic senators who voted in favor of the bill in states where it is no longer popular. Among these senators include:

[42]

Sen. Lee letter

In July 2013, Lee authored a letter, which as of August 2013 had been signed by 14 Republican senators, which promised a government shutdown unless the Affordable Care Act was defunded. The senators up for reelection in 2014 who signed the letter are:

Senate Conservative Fund targets

The Senate Conservative Fund targeted Sens. Isakson (R-GA), Graham (R-SC), Alexander (R-TN) and Burr (R-NC) in August 2013 with two weeks of radio ads designed to push Senate Republicans to support Utah's Mike Lee's effort to defund Obamacare. [43]

House Republicans passed a bill, the Student Success Act, on July 19, 2013 to reduce the federal role in public education and outline their vision for a national educational policy to replace the No Child Left Behind law.[44][45] The measure would give state and local governments greater powers to determine how best to improve schools and would sharply reduce federal involvement in education matters.[45]

It marks a significant departure from No Child Left Behind, the 2002 law that set federal goals for academic achievement and penalties for schools that fell short of those goals, as well as prescriptions for steps states must take to improve failing schools.[44]

No Democrats supported the bill, which passed by a 221 to 207 margin, with 12 Republicans voting with the Democrats against the measure.[46] It marked the first time in a dozen years that either chamber of Congress approved a comprehensive bill to update federal education law.[44]

The House bill is said to have no chance of moving through the Democratic-led Senate as it is written and President Obama has threatened to veto it.[45] The Senate committee overseeing education has completed work on its own measure that would give states greater flexibility in writing their own plans to improve schools. But, unlike the Republican proposal that passed the House, that bill would allow the education secretary to retain approval power over those proposals.[45] Full Senate consideration of the measure is unlikely to happen before the fall of 2014.[45]

State-by-state breakdown

United States Senate Elections Results in 2014
State Incumbent Incumbent Party Incumbent Running? 2014 Winner Partisan switch?
Alabama Jeff Sessions Ends.png Republican Pending Pending Pending
Alaska Mark Begich Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
Arkansas Mark Pryor Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
Colorado Mark Udall Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
Delaware Chris Coons Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
Georgia Saxby Chambliss Ends.png Republican No[47] Pending Pending
Idaho Jim Risch Ends.png Republican Pending Pending Pending
Illinois Richard Durbin Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
Iowa Tom Harkin Electiondot.png Democratic No[48] Pending Pending
Kansas Pat Roberts Ends.png Republican Pending Pending Pending
Kentucky Mitch McConnell Ends.png Republican Pending Pending Pending
Louisiana Mary Landrieu Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
Maine Susan Collins Ends.png Republican Pending Pending Pending
Massachusetts Mo Cowan Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
Michigan Carl Levin Electiondot.png Democratic No[49] Pending Pending
Minnesota Al Franken Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
Mississippi Thad Cochran Ends.png Republican Pending Pending Pending
Montana Max Baucus Electiondot.png Democratic No[1] Pending Pending
Nebraska Mike Johanns Ends.png Republican No[50] Pending Pending
New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
New Jersey Frank Lautenberg Electiondot.png Democratic No[51] Pending Pending
New Mexico Tom Udall Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
North Carolina Kay Hagan Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
Oklahoma Jim Inhofe Ends.png Republican Pending Pending Pending
Oregon Jeff Merkley Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
Rhode Island Jack Reed Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
South Carolina Lindsey Graham Ends.png Republican Pending Pending Pending
South Dakota Tim Johnson Electiondot.png Democratic No[52] Pending Pending
Tennessee Lamar Alexander Ends.png Republican Pending Pending Pending
Texas John Cornyn Ends.png Republican Pending Pending Pending
Virginia Mark Warner Electiondot.png Democratic Pending Pending Pending
West Virginia Jay Rockefeller Electiondot.png Democratic No[53] Pending Pending
Wyoming Mike Enzi Ends.png Republican Pending Pending Pending

See also

External links

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Politico, "Brian Schweitzer move aids GOP in battle for Senate", July 13,2013
  2. Salon.com "The House GOP can’t be beat: It’s worse than gerrymandering," January 13, 2013
  3. 3.0 3.1 Politico "Red-state Democrats raise millions" Accessed April 18, 2013
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Politico "Senate cash dash now a marathon" Accessed August 1, 2013
  5. MSNBC, "GOP to donors: Democratic Senate majority is in serious trouble," accessed July 22, 2013
  6. Politico, "GOP fears fundraising disaster," accessed September 12, 2013
  7. The Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2014 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," accessed November 5, 2013
  8. FairVote, "FairVote Releases Projections for the 2014 Congressional Elections," accessed November 5, 2013
  9. Cook Political Report, "Our Accuracy," accessed December 12, 2011
  10. Cook Political Report, "2014 SENATE RACE RATINGS," June 27, 2013
  11. Cook Political Report, "2014 SENATE RACE RATINGS," August 2, 2013
  12. Cook Political Report, "2014 SENATE RACE RATINGS," October 17, 2013
  13. Cook Political Report, "2014 SENATE RACE RATINGS," December 19, 2013
  14. Cook Political Report, "2014 SENATE RACE RATINGS," February 7, 2014
  15. Cook Political Report, "2014 SENATE RACE RATINGS," February 27, 2014
  16. Cook Political Report, "2014 SENATE RACE RATINGS," March 19, 2014
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 The New York Times, "Can Republicans Win the Senate in 2014?," February 20, 2013
  18. The New York Times, "Can Republicans Win the Senate in 2014?," February 20, 2013
  19. The New York Times, "Can Republicans Win the Senate in 2014?," February 20, 2013
  20. FiveThirtyEight, "FiveThirtyEight Senate Forecast: GOP Is Slight Favorite in Race for Senate Control," March 23, 2014
  21. Fiscal Times "7 Senate Seats Most at Risk—Hint: They’re All Blue" Accessed February 15, 2013
  22. 22.00 22.01 22.02 22.03 22.04 22.05 22.06 22.07 22.08 22.09 22.10 22.11 22.12 22.13 22.14 22.15 22.16 22.17 22.18 22.19 22.20 22.21 22.22 22.23 22.24 22.25 22.26 22.27 Washington Post, "The Fix’s top 10 Senate races of 2014," accessed August 9, 2013
  23. Reuters, "U.S. Senate Republicans start closing ranks on spending bill," accessed September 24, 2013
  24. 24.0 24.1 Izaak Walton League of America, "What is a Farm Bill?", accessed September 17, 2013
  25. National Farmers Union, "2013 Farm Bill", accessed September 17, 2013
  26. New York Times, "Fraud Used to Frame Farm Bill Debate", accessed September 17, 2013
  27. National Journal, "Fight Over Food Stamps Dominates Farm Bill", accessed September 19, 2013
  28. University of Illinois Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, "2013 Farm Bill Update - July 2013", accessed September 17, 2013
  29. 29.0 29.1 29.2 Miami Herald, "Timeline of key events in Syrian uprising," September 4, 2013
  30. U.S. News and World Reports, "John Kerry, Chuck Hagel Pitch Syrian Strike to Congress," September 3, 2013
  31. Huffington Post, "House Syria Hearing: John Kerry, Chuck Hagel Going Before Foreign Affairs Committee," September 4, 2013
  32. 32.0 32.1 ABC News "Who Are the Gang Of 8 in Senate Immigration Debate?" Accessed May 7, 2013
  33. 33.0 33.1 33.2 Washington Post "Gang of Eight immigration plan: Reality-based legislating" Accessed May 7, 2013
  34. 34.0 34.1 NY Times "Immigration Overhaul Passes in Senate" Accessed June 27, 2013
  35. CNN "Senate passes sweeping immigration bill" Accessed June 27, 2013
  36. Politico "Behind closed doors, Boehner pushes immigration action" Accessed July 10, 2013
  37. Politico "Harry Reid needles John Boehner over Hastert rule" Accessed July 8, 2013
  38. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named hastert
  39. The Hill, "Senate Democrats see farm bill, rural voters as key to 2014 election," Accessed June 6, 2013
  40. 40.0 40.1 40.2 40.3 Open Secrets "Agribusiness and the Farm Bill: Wayward Dems Benefit from Contributions" Accessed July 19, 2013
  41. USA Today, "House passes farm bill; strips out food-stamp program," accessed July 15, 2013
  42. Senate.gov "U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 111th Congress - 1st Session," accessed July 15, 2013
  43. The Hill, "Senate Conservatives Fund targets Isakson with latest 'defund ObamaCare' ad," August 22, 2013
  44. 44.0 44.1 44.2 Washington Post "House GOP passes education bill to reverse No Child Left Behind" Accessed July 19, 2013
  45. 45.0 45.1 45.2 45.3 45.4 Yahoo News "House passes bill to replace education law" Accessed July 19, 2013
  46. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named students
  47. Washington Post "Saxby Chambliss retiring in 2014," January 25, 2013
  48. USA Today "Iowa Sen. Harkin will not seek re-election," January 26, 2013
  49. Washington Post.com "Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) won’t seek re-election in 2014" March 8, 2013
  50. NY Times.com "Republican Senator From Nebraska Won’t Run in 2014" accessed February 18, 2013
  51. NJ.com "Frank Lautenberg will not seek re-election next year," February 14, 2013
  52. Washington Post "AP sources: South Dakota Sen. Johnson won’t seek re-election; 5th Democratic senator to retire" accessed March 28, 2013
  53. USA Today, "Rockefeller's retirement sparks battle for Senate seat," January 11, 2013