Vote button trans.png
April's Project of the Month
It's spring time. It's primary election season!
Click here to find all the information you'll need to cast your ballot.




Difference between revisions of "Ventura View Protection Ordinance Initiative, Measure B (November 2009)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(External links)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
The question asked on the ballot will be,  "Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted to implement general plan objectives, to preserve viewsheds by establishing a 23-member View Resources Board appointed predominantly by VCORD to prepare a View Protection Ordinance (VPO); enact a temporary moratorium on new development approvals exceeding 26 feet in height in specified areas until VPO approval the VPO or allow View Resources Board member(s) to submit VPO initiative to voters?"
 
The question asked on the ballot will be,  "Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted to implement general plan objectives, to preserve viewsheds by establishing a 23-member View Resources Board appointed predominantly by VCORD to prepare a View Protection Ordinance (VPO); enact a temporary moratorium on new development approvals exceeding 26 feet in height in specified areas until VPO approval the VPO or allow View Resources Board member(s) to submit VPO initiative to voters?"
 +
 +
==Supporters==
 +
 +
Diane Underhill, a spokeswoman for Measure B, gives these reasons for a "yes" vote.<ref>[http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2009/oct/04/protects-citys-priceless-views-promotes-business/ ''Ventura County Star'', "Protects city's priceless views, promotes business", October 4, 2009]</ref>
 +
 +
* If voters reject Measure B, "then our sweeping east/west views will be replaced by concrete canyons and visual barricades."
 +
* Existing ordinances do not "prevent incompatibly tall buildings from walling off our views to the surrounding environment."
 +
* "Measure B allows appointed neighborhood representatives from all parts of the city, plus a community representative from the Visitors Bureau, Chamber of Commerce, City Council, Planning Commission and planning staff to reach out to their districts and then write a view-protection ordinance that can be adopted by the council or go to voters."
 +
* The development process in Ventura will be more predictable if Measure B is adopted.
 +
* "If Ventura voters want definitive rules dealing with neighborhood-specific policies to protect public views, then we must use Measure B’s process to amend the general plan to include them. If we do not address this issue now, it will be years before we have a chance to address it again — and by then it will be too late."
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==

Revision as of 08:44, 4 October 2009

A Ventura View Protection Ordinance Initiative, Measure B will be on the November 3, 2009 ballot in Ventura County for voters in the City of Ventura.

The question asked on the ballot will be, "Shall an initiative ordinance be adopted to implement general plan objectives, to preserve viewsheds by establishing a 23-member View Resources Board appointed predominantly by VCORD to prepare a View Protection Ordinance (VPO); enact a temporary moratorium on new development approvals exceeding 26 feet in height in specified areas until VPO approval the VPO or allow View Resources Board member(s) to submit VPO initiative to voters?"

Supporters

Diane Underhill, a spokeswoman for Measure B, gives these reasons for a "yes" vote.[1]

  • If voters reject Measure B, "then our sweeping east/west views will be replaced by concrete canyons and visual barricades."
  • Existing ordinances do not "prevent incompatibly tall buildings from walling off our views to the surrounding environment."
  • "Measure B allows appointed neighborhood representatives from all parts of the city, plus a community representative from the Visitors Bureau, Chamber of Commerce, City Council, Planning Commission and planning staff to reach out to their districts and then write a view-protection ordinance that can be adopted by the council or go to voters."
  • The development process in Ventura will be more predictable if Measure B is adopted.
  • "If Ventura voters want definitive rules dealing with neighborhood-specific policies to protect public views, then we must use Measure B’s process to amend the general plan to include them. If we do not address this issue now, it will be years before we have a chance to address it again — and by then it will be too late."

External links



Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found