Washington Repeal Tax Law Amendments, Initiative 1107 (2010)
- 1 Text of measure
- 2 Background
- 3 Support
- 4 Opposition
- 5 Reports and analysis
- 6 Media Editorial Positions
- 7 Polls
- 8 Path to the ballot
- 9 See also
- 10 External links
- 11 Additional reading
- 12 References
On July 2, 2010 initiative supporters submitted an estimated 395,103 signatures, exceeding the 241,000 minimum requirement. On July 28, election officials reported that I-1107 had qualified for the ballot.
Text of measure
The ballot title reads:
- Statement of Subject: Initiative Measure No. 1107 concerns reversing certain 2010 amendments to state tax laws.
- Concise Description:This measure would reduce tax rates for certain food processors; end the sales tax on candy; and end the temporary sales tax on some bottled water and temporary excise taxes on carbonated beverages.
- Should this measure be enacted into law? Yes [ ] No [ ]
According to the description prepared by the Washington Secretary of State:
This measure would reverse certain 2010 amendments to state tax laws, thereby: ending the sales tax on candy and the temporary sales tax on some bottled water; and ending temporary excise taxes on the activity of selling certain carbonated beverages, not including alcoholic beverages or carbonated bottled water. It would also reinstate a reduced business and occupation tax rate for processors of certain foods.
Initiative 1107 was proposed in reaction to the April 2010 approval of taxes on soda and other sugary beverages. The new 2 cent tax on every 12 ounces of soda. Similar taxes were implemented in Maine and Colorado but beverage industry lobbyists quashed efforts to pass a soda tax in 2010 in Mississippi, New Mexico and New York state. The tax developed in an effort to generate revenue in order to ease the $2.8 billion budget gap. The tax is estimated to raise $94 million.
Effects if measure passes
|Taxes on the ballot in 2010|
I-1107 repeals the 2010 temporary excise tax on carbonated beverages in addition to a three year temporary sales tax on bottled water that lasts from 2010 to 2013. The sales tax on candy would also be repealed in addition to processed foods.
Conflicts with R-52
I-1107 conflicts with R-52 because the initiative abolishes sales taxes on candy, processed food, carbonated beverages and the temporary sales tax on bottled water if approved. R-52 calls for a temporary expansion of the bottled water sales tax until 2013 if approved. Abolishing four sources of sales tax revenue through I-1107's approval including bottled water would make it difficult for the state to pay for energy efficiency projects that are contingent on that revenue.
In support of the proposed measure, the American Beverage Association (ABA), is reported to have spent an estimated $1 million gathering petition signatures for the July 2 statewide deadline. According to October reports, supporters of the proposed measure have reportedly raised more than $16 million, making this the most expensive initiative campaign in Washington state history.
According to August 2010 reports, supporters spent an estimated $2.5 million to get signatures and put I-1107 on the 2010 ballot. In August 2010 the American Beverage Association has reportedly made at least two $3.5 million contributions The campaign is reported to have had $10.2 million in total donations. However, as of early September 2010 the supporting campaign has reportedly raised an estimated $14.4 million, which according to news reports makes I-1107 the most expensive initiative campaign in state history.
Tactics and strategies
In September 2010, according to Kathryn Stenger, spokesperson for the campaign, said that supporters were preparing to launch a statewide campaign.
Opponents, including advocates for children, education and health care, argue that I-1107 is "misleading and deceptive." The main campaign group in opposition to the proposed measure is Citizens to Protect Our Economic Future and the Protect Washington coalition. Opponents said they want to preserve the taxes on soda pop and candy in order to avoid drastic cuts to health care and education.
In regard to initiative campaign efforts opposition spokesperson Sandeep Kaushik said, "I think this reinforces what we’ve been saying all along – that it’s clear the beverage association understands that in an equal debate, they would lose. So they’ve decided to try to buy the election with extraordinary record amounts of cash...They are interested in protecting their massive profits and spend extraordinary amounts to preserve them."
According to September 2010 reports, Citizens to Protect Our Economic Future raised $304,229 to fight the repeal measure.
Reports and analysis
Budget and Policy Center
The Washington State Budget and Policy Center released an analysis of the several Washington 2010 initiatives, including I-1107. According to the study, the impact of I-1107 to the state's general fund over a 5-year period is estimated at $352 million. The study concludes that the initiative would reduce state resources in current and future fiscal years. Such resources would include repealing revenue increases approved in 2010 which the organization describes as having "played a pivotal role in preventing painful and economically damaging cuts to essential public services."
Media Editorial Positions
- The Seattle Times opposes I-1107. In an editorial, the board said, "It would create a $200 million hole in the state's next two-year budget — and already that budget appears to be at least $3 billion short."
- The Tacoma News Tribune opposes I-1107. In an editorial, the board said, "Now the American Beverage Association has come to Washington to mount the same assault that it’s successfully pushed elsewhere. It has contributed almost every penny of the $14 million the I-1107 campaign has in the bank. That campaign has tried mightily to bill the initiative as a fight against “grocery taxes” – a spin job that hangs by such a small thread of truth as to be nearly fraudulent."
- The Olympian opposes I-1107. In an editorial, the board said, "Or do we, instead, want to make a small sacrifice and spend an additional 2 cents for a 12-ounce soda pop to keep necessary services in place? The choice seems obvious."
- The Walla Walla Union-Bulletin opposes I-1107.
- See also: Polls, 2010 ballot measures
- An August 26-August 29, 2010 poll of 650 likely voters by Survey USA showed that 42% of voters were certain they would support I-1107, 34% were certain they would oppose the measure, and 24% were undecided. 
- A September 9-12, 2010 poll of 500 likely voters by Elway Poll revealed that 47% support the proposed measure, while 38% are opposed and 15% are undecided.
- A September 30-October 3, 2010 poll of 639 likely voters by Survey USA revealed that 52% support the proposed measure, while 29% are opposed and 19% are undecided. The poll was sponsored by KING-TV Seattle. The margin of error is +/- 4 percentage points.
|Date of Poll||Pollster||In favor||Opposed||Undecided||Number polled|
|August 26 - 29, 2010||Survey USA||42%||34%||24%||650|
|Sept. 9-12, 2010||Elway Poll||47%||38%||15%||500|
|Sept. 30-Oct. 3, 2010||SurveyUSA||52%||29%||19%||639|
|Oct. 7-10, 2010||The Elway Poll||54%||33%||13%||400|
|Oct. 4-14, 2010||The Washington Poll||56%||36%||7%||500|
|Oct. 24-27, 2010||SurveyUSA||56%||36%||9%||504|
Path to the ballot
On July 2, 2010 initiative supporters submitted an estimated 395,103 signatures, exceeding the 241,000 minimum requirement. According to the Washington Secretary of State supporters scheduled an appointment with the state elections office for 8:30 a.m. on July 2. In order to qualify for the November ballot, supporters are required to submit a minimum of 241,153 valid signatures by July 2, 2010.
- The Spokesman Review,"Money pours into initiative campaigns," September 5, 2010
- The News Tribune,"Ballot will shape state budget," August 30, 2010
- The News Tribune,"Initiatives draw cash," August 22, 2010
- Washington Secretary of State's: From Our Corner,"Here’s your quick guide to WA ballot measures," August 10, 2010
- The Spokesman-Review,"6th initiative makes ballot, would cut taxes," July 28, 2010
- The Daily Herald,"5 Washington state ballot measures could end up in court," July 18, 2010
- KPLU 88.5,"$8.2M Spent So Far To Get Initiatives On Wash. Ballot," July 15, 2010
- Inlander,"Taking Initiative," June 16, 2010
- Washington Secretary of State,"Initiative 1106 and 1107 brief description," retrieved June 3, 2010
- Seattle Post-Intelligencer,"Food fight: Push to repeal taxes is a 'con,' foes say," June 17, 2010
- Washington's: From Our Corner,"`Direct democracy’ — A six-pack for 2010," July 2, 2010
- From Our Corner, "Initiative checks done, I-1107 qualifies", July 28, 2010
- Stateline.org,"Industry lobbying turns soda taxes from fizzy to flat," July 7, 2010
- The Washington Post,"Soda taxes fizzle in wake of industry lobbying," July 13, 2010
- Washington Secretary of State "2010 Voter Guide, Initiative 1107"
- Washington Secretary of State "Summary of I-1107 (2010)"
- Washington Secretary of State "2010 Voter Guide, Referred Bill 52"
- The Stranger "Even more money from the soda lobby?" October 12, 2010
- Seattle Post-Intelligencer,"Anti-soda tax campaign tops $10 mil," August 18, 2010
- Associated Press,"Wash. initiative campaigns draw big campaign cash," August 17, 2010
- The News Tribune,"Soda makers raise ante, contribute again to tax-rollback measure," September 3, 2010
- The Bellingham Herald,"Updated: Soda industry ante on I-1107 hits $14.4 million," September 1, 2010
- MyNorthwest.com,"Most funded initiative in state history," September 28, 2010
- Othello Outlook,"Ballot measures could have significant impacts on state - Washington State Budget and Policy Center," August 24, 2010
- Washington State Budget and Policy Center,"New OFM Analyses Show Potential Costs of 2010 Initiatives," August 11, 2010
- The Seattle Times,"Voters should reject I-1107 and keep tax increase on candy, water and pop," September 10, 2010
- The News Tribune,"Don't make state crisis worse with Initiative 1107," September 19, 2010
- The Olympian,"Don't be misled: I-1107 will be devastating to state coffers," October 7, 2010
- Union-Bulletin,"State can't afford loss of candy and water tax," October 7, 2010
- Survey USA, "Results of SurveyUSA Election Poll #17011" August 30, 2010
- PubliCola,"SurveyUSA Poll Could Spell Bad News for Progressive Coalition," August 31, 2010
- FireDogLake,"WA Ballot Measures Polling Under 50% – So Much for That Anti-Tax, Less Government Wave," September 16, 2010
- Seattle Post-Intelligencer,"Skeptical public? All initiatives under 50 percent in poll," September 15, 2010
- The Spokesman Review,"Initiative support tepid in poll," September 20, 2010
- SurveyUSA,"10 Days Until WA Ballots Mailed, New Support for Initiative 1107, Steady Support for 1053, Faltering Support for Referendum 52," October 4, 2010
- The Associated Press,"Opponents of soda, candy taxes turn in signatures," July 2, 2010
- The Port Townsend & Jefferson County Leader,"Initiative 1107 aims to repeal food and beverage tax with Nov. ballot," July 13, 2010
- Washington Secretary of State's Blog: From Our Corner,"It’s raining initiatives...," June 24, 2010
- Associated Press,"Soda initiative expected on Washington ballot," June 23, 2010
- The News Tribune,"Could be 6 citizen initiatives on ballot in November," June 27, 2010
- The Daily Herald,"Up to 7 initiatives could make ballot in Washington," June 28, 2010
- Washington Secretary of State's: From Our Corner,"Another initiative hurdle cleared," July 26, 2010
- The Bellingham Herald,"Pop tax repeal is 6th initiative to qualify for ballot," July 29, 2010
- Auburn Reporter,"Initiative checks done; I-1107 qualifies," July 28, 2010
State of Washington
|State executive officers||
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | State Auditor | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Commissioner of Insurance | Director of Agriculture | Commissioner of Public Lands | Director of Labor and Industries | Chairman of Utilities and Transportation |