Read the State Legislative Tracker. New edition available now!

Difference between revisions of "Washington Tax Limitation Act, Initiative 722 (2000)"

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - '[[category' to '[[Category')
m (Text replace - '==Election Results==' to '==Election results==')
Line 3: Line 3:
 
The [[ballot title]] question asked of voters was, "Shall certain 1999 tax and fee increases be nullified, vehicles exempted from [[property tax]]es, and [[property tax]] increases (except new construction) limited to 2% annually?"
 
The [[ballot title]] question asked of voters was, "Shall certain 1999 tax and fee increases be nullified, vehicles exempted from [[property tax]]es, and [[property tax]] increases (except new construction) limited to 2% annually?"
  
==Election Results==
+
==Election results==
 
{{short outcome
 
{{short outcome
 
|title=Initiative 722
 
|title=Initiative 722

Revision as of 10:56, 12 July 2011

Ballot measures
in Washington State
Seal of Washington.jpg
Constitutional amendments
Initiatives to the People
Initiatives to the Legislature
Statutes referred by Legislature
Veto referendums
Political topics on the ballot
LawsHistoryConstitution
Washington Initiative Measure 722, also known as the Tax Repeal/Limits Act, was on the November 7, 2000 election ballot in Washington as an Initiative to the People, where it was approved.

The ballot title question asked of voters was, "Shall certain 1999 tax and fee increases be nullified, vehicles exempted from property taxes, and property tax increases (except new construction) limited to 2% annually?"

Election results

Initiative 722
ResultVotesPercentage
Approveda Yes 1,295,391 55.89%
No1,022,34944.11%

Text of the proposal

The language that appeared on the ballot:

Initiative Statute

Explanatory Statement by Attorney General: This measure would declare "null and void" any tax increases adopted without voter approval by state and local governments in Washington between July 2, 1999, and December 31, 1999, and would require that any such increase be refunded to the taxpayers. The term "tax" would include sales and use taxes; property taxes; business and occupation taxes; fuel taxes; impact fees; license fees; permit fees; water, sewer, and other utility charges, including taxes, rates, and hook-up fees; and other excise taxes, fees, or monetary charges imposed.

This measure would also state that motor vehicles are exempt from property taxes as long as the retail sales tax is applied to vehicles.

The measure would further provide that, so long as sales of property are subject to local real estate excise tax, a person would be exempt from a legal obligation to pay that portion of property taxes attributable to any increase in value of property (other than for new construction or manufacture) over its 1999 valuation level, plus the lesser of 2% per year or inflation. As long as construction materials are subject to the retail sales tax, a person would be exempt from a legal obligation to pay the portion of property tax on newly constructed or manufactured property after 1999 over the property tax imposed on the owner of a comparable property constructed as of 1999, plus the lesser of 2% per year or inflation.

The measure would also create an exemption from property tax for increases in tax attributable to maintenance improvements made after January 1, 1999. "Maintenance improvements" would include reconstruction after fire and natural disaster or replacement of existing components such as roofs, siding, windows, doors, and painting.

The measure would also amend RCW 84.55.005 to change all of the "106%" limitation factors on property tax levy increases to "102%." The new limit factors would be the lower of 102% or inflation, with the same exceptions for certain taxing districts as are provided in existing law. In other words, a taxing district could increase its levy by no more than the lower of (a) the previous year's inflation rate or (b) 2% over the highest of the three previous years.

The measure would repeal RCW 84.55.092. Taxing districts not levying the maximum amount in prior years would no longer be able to "recapture" levy capacity in future levies.

See also

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Suggest a link

External links